Kazunori Yamauchi Teases Next Batch of GT Sport Cars, Update Coming Next Week

  • Thread starter GTPNewsWire
  • 789 comments
  • 113,717 views
Let me help you:
89147_1__47745.original.jpg
Close, but I guess that one is Koutch_Pro's job :)
 
We need a fix for the steering wheel and hands animation!! It's stupid in VR to see only 180° deegres rotation if you are playing with a wheel!!
 

You could try to be more helpful and less patronising rather than just pointing out how wrong everyone is without trying to explain why you are so certain it is a Red Bull Junior.

I only realised it was finally a junior because of finally noticing the front nose. And that wasn't your doing

If you are smart enough to know these things, use it to educate others rather than laughing at others
 
Very interesting selection of cars, but it poses the question of what track(s) we may get next. If the cars in this pack are Super GT, then we could get a Super GT track like Fuji or even Motegi. In addition, if there are Red Bull cars coming, Red Bull Ring is always a possibility too. Can't wait to unpack this update when it comes out.
 
If you are smart enough to know these things, use it to educate others rather than laughing at others
I'm not laughing at anybody.

Maybe my vision might be better than most peoples here. I don't see how I could explain to them things that I can see which they seem to be struggling to see.
I am also viewing these pics fullscreen on a "55 UHD TV from about 2m distance.

But the post you quoted was a joke since I am angry and full of PMT. :lol:
 
My thoughts as well, and I'm hoping we are right because I'm a huge R32 fan. If It's the Nismo model My head will explode!:bowdown::eek:
Yes. The R33 has a sweeping rear glass. That silhouette looks shorter. Plus, the rear spoiler appears more angled than the rounded R33. We'll see.

About the "wow. No supra." Could be sarcasm or genuine. Either way, why not wow? There is one more classic (Celica)Supra from the series. Complete the set.
 
I'm not laughing at anybody.

I know that stuff can be misunderstood on the internet...but you used a laughing emoticon and now are trying to say you weren't laughing at someone.

Maybe my vision might be better than most peoples here. I don't see how I could explain to them things that I can see which they seem to be struggling to see.

By, as someone else did, circling part of the image where there are some pixels. I'm viewing this on a small laptop, and many others will be viewing this on no bigger than ''30 screens or even mobile phones. Let alone some bloody Ultra HD screen where the pixels are probably 4 dimensional

Whether you realise it or not, you were being patronising and unhelpful, and it isn't up for you to decide that. Only other people can decide if you were helpful
 
Back