- 34,949
- Indian Falls, NY
- slashfan7964
That's argueable. To me the best car to me is the Ford GT40.
Best car to me is the Mustang. So I agree.
That's argueable. To me the best car to me is the Ford GT40.
1000 pounds less then what Lamborghini says the Aventador weighs, or 1000 pounds less than the 300 extra pounds that the Aventador actually weighed when magazines started testing it?
1000 pounds less then what Lamborghini says the Aventador weighs, or 1000 pounds less than the 300 extra pounds that the Aventador actually weighed when magazines started testing it?
It's not a good idea to get cocky after displaying a poor understanding of basic economics. The price doesn't have as much to do with the material lining the dash as you think, if anything at all. Go Wiki the principle of supply and demand, as well as the term scarcity. Those two ideas should shed some light and prevent further frivolous arguments.What year did you stop liking sports cars? How old are you, btw? Do you play Gran Turismo, knowing your favorite cars won't out perform the 85% of cars the other players use?
Just concerned, is all. lol
ExorcetWell you'd be wrong on that, as use isn't actually determined by what the car is used for (at least in this case).
Any of the car mentioned could be used as a track car. Just because some aren't used for that and sit in garages doesn't mean a thing.
As for this car, the aerodynamics and weight (Almost 1000 lbs less than the Aventador according to one of the links in this thread, though I'm not sure how credible) could make it worlds apart from any other Lamborghini.
I'm actually worried about Pagani. The Huayra is not only ugly, but it's heavier than the Zonda. Weight is a sin when it comes to performance cars.
Pagani still raped on Top Gear though.
Pagani still raped on Top Gear though.
Meh... I read somewhere this week that Pagani had admitted that the Huayra on Top Gear was running hand cut slicks - the same tyres the Zonda R used to set its 'Ring lap.
Hammond had been driving it on it's usual road tyres, and Pagani swapped them for Stig's lap attempt.
The Pagani is fast... but it's not that fast.
Another person with no clue about the actual car.But still there is nothing special about a different paint extended aventador with a new spoiler with tuned suspensions. Some custom auto shop could do all this for me for less than 3mil. Why didn't they just take the time to make a new car.
Ah, the old heritage argument that means nothing in the grand scheme of things except as a way to move cars.Yes, I do despise modern Ferrari’s and Lamborghini’s … primarily because of the type of customer they are aiming their cars at nowadays. Ferrari does at least have some proper motorsport heritage though, and their recent cars are widely praised by the motoring press.
I like that you again resort back to pointing out only the Aventador-sourced bits & make no attempt to comment on anything else; materials, tuning differences, wheels, brakes, etc. I suggest taking some time to look into how Boeing & Lamborghini developed the Sesto Elemento. The concept is the same applied to an Aventador base, but with more details involved.I can’t get the official press release to open, but how Lamborghini choose to spin the Veneno’s mechanicals and reality will be limited by the $12 million budget they have (plus whatever they chose to swallow in add on costs wrapped up in their total PR budget) – which is nothing in car building terms, particularly when they will have needed to invest a huge amount in aero work at least. The tub and subframes are Aventador, the engine is tweaked Aventador (likely we’ll see this in forthcoming upgraded Aventador models), and a wild stab in the dark bets that the suspension is pretty much Aventador too. The interior might have different materials, but it’s pretty much an Aventador interior.
The only really significant difference is the bodywork – which clearly also includes the aero side.
What else is in the future? You must know to make such a statement you know full well you can't actually back up at this time.At $4 million it's a publicity gimic without a corresponding level of engineering substance to back up the stupid price... if we're talking substance, a P1/918/La Ferrari (silly name!) would destroy it on performance for a quarter of the price, whilst still offering a very high level of exclusivity. You could buy a Veyron SS for less than half the price of this (though you'd then have a mr blobby car, rather than one that looks like it's been styled in a 12 yo's wet dream).
I like that you again resort back to pointing out only the Aventador-sourced bits & make no attempt to comment on anything else; materials, tuning differences, wheels, brakes, etc. I suggest taking some time to look into how Boeing & Lamborghini developed the Sesto Elemento. The concept is the same applied to an Aventador base, but with more details involved.
I had no idea $2.5 million was also less than half the price of $4 million. Has math failed in the future as well? Or are we just speaking of what we think we know & not actually making sure we're correct?
Meh... I read somewhere this week that Pagani had admitted that the Huayra on Top Gear was running hand cut slicks - the same tyres the Zonda R used to set its 'Ring lap.
Hammond had been driving it on it's usual road tyres, and Pagani swapped them for Stig's lap attempt.
The Pagani is fast... but it's not that fast.
Since I'm here I'll do it for him.
I posted this in the Premium Top Gear thread but not the Huayra thread so I just updated that one too.
Since I'm here I'll do it for him.
I posted this in the Premium Top Gear thread but not the Huayra thread so I just updated that one too.
It's not a good idea to get cocky after displaying a poor understanding of basic economics. The price doesn't have as much to do with the material lining the dash as you think, if anything at all. Go Wiki the principle of supply and demand, as well as the term scarcity. Those two ideas should shed some light and prevent further frivolous arguments.