Keef
Premium
- 25,106
- Dayton, OH
- GTP_KeefRacer
- GTP Keef
There are numerous electric airplanes in development right now, including a version of Cessna's 172 powered by lithium batteries. Most of the others are very light or are self-propelled gliders.Please, do tell what alternatives have the efficiency of an electric setup. The only place I do not see electric motors prevailing is aeronautics, where weight from batteries is a large concern.
I'm not a massive fan of electric cars, but the reality is the electric motor is more than twice as efficient at converting stored energy into kinetic when compared to an ICE of any sort. Hydrogen ICE is like taking two steps forward (storing hydrogen safely) while taking three steps backward (wasting most of the energy to heat) because, again, the ICE is just woeful by today's standards.
The fact that Boeing mucked up their lithium batteries on the 787 was a disaster for that type of battery in aviation. They're so reliable in every day use, even in cars; they royally screwed that one up. It's like they let a 5 year old design a technology that's been dead-nuts reliable for 10+ years. Why didn't they just call Samsung and say, yo, we need some batteries that won't blow up.
Not only is a hydrogen engine less efficient, simply making the hydrogen seems moronic to me. The only practical ways to do it involve the use of resources which are already useful in themselves.
You can make hydrogen by burning fossil fuels and doing magic with steam; natural gas, methane, is a good fuel to use. The only problem is that methane is already perfectly useful by itself. But, hell, in the name of science why don't we just not use the perfectly good methane, add a bunch of complicated and unnecessary steps, then make and use hydrogen which is even less efficient a fuel than methane.
Or electrolysis. Why on earth would anybody think of using the electricity that is already mass produced and used by virtually everything everywhere to power cars, too? That's dumb. We should use the already useful, available, and very cheap electricity to boil some water and make hydrogen which is far worse a source of energy than the electricity we just wasted to make it. Yeah, that's a great idea.
I'm no scientist or engineer but sometimes I really wonder what these people are thinking. It's like, why on earth do we burn coal to make electricity when we can use that coal to...[insert complex and expensive 7 step process]...and viola, we've created hydrogen to burn and create electricity. Which we'll then use to create more hydrogen. #engineering