Major Earthquake & Tsunami in Japan

  • Thread starter a6m5
  • 1,128 comments
  • 109,077 views
Chernobyl was a different kind of reactor. Anyway, that is fantastic news that the pressure and radioactivity are normalizing. They must've airlifted in 5,000 lbs. of Beano after the gas explosion.
 
Boffin on the telly was describing the relative safety of a steam explosion versus a reactor explosion.

He seems confident that it probably is a steam release, and that the problem was caused by the decay heat and the failure of both the primary (i.e. ordinary use) closed cooling loops as well as the auxiliary / backup units. Obviously they have external pumps now and are indeed flooding the casing with coolant. Also, the decay heat problem decreases exponentially over time, so the longer this goes on (without major incident), the better the outlook.

The boffin was: Prof. Robin Grimes (or similar spelling...) EDIT: the spelling is exact, he's a professor of material physics at Imperial College in London.
 
Chernobyl was a different kind of reactor.

I know, in the end it doesn't matter that much though.

EDIT: When you look at that blast wave on top of the whole thing, it indeed looks a lot like a steam explosion, the pressure is huge. Anyway, I am just not trusting the government right now.
 
So people this cloud full of radioactivity can come to Europe too?

If it's of any consolation, when Chernobyl happened (as mentioned above), some fallout did reach the mountains of Wales, but in such tiny amounts that it was harmless.
 
Last edited:
^ If the cloud did somehow reach Europe, I doubt it will be in a highly concentrated state (i.e. enough to cause our kids to be born with the wrong numbers of toes, fingers or limbs).

Edit: Damn, I've been triple-tree'd!
 
If it's of any consolation, when Chernobyl happened (as entioned above), some fallout did reach the mountains of Wales, but in such tiny amounts that it was harmless.
It wasn't harmless, it's still a serious problem in the UK now and will be in many years into the future.
It depends what you call serious, but it did cause a lot of harm.
 
can someone in a very simple way answer my question please
is it harmful for people?! how is it gonna affect other country s & which country s
 
It wasn't harmless, it's still a serious problem in the UK now and will be in many years into the future.
It depends what you call serious, but it did cause a lot of harm.

Not according to my relatives who have a farm amongst the valleys of Powys (and have had for 40+ years), but I guess it could have affected people differently. Their ewe's are now routinely scanned before taken to market and rarely does one return significant positive results. I'm not saying that nobody was significantly affecteds, but the initial scare was an over-reaction and many weren't affected at all.
 
Last edited:
If there's one, it's, well, possible, although kinda unlikely because of the distance. The question is, will it "enter" in to the food chain?

Cloverfield here we go.
 
can someone in a very simple way answer my question please
is it harmful for people?! how is it gonna affect other country s & which country s

Yes, it is harmful. All radiation is harmful, and you're exposed to it every day. How much more harmful this is remains to be seen. About 50 times more harmful is the minimum (which was described as a "very small amount" anyway).
As for which countries it will affect, that's impossible to tell. It didn't get blasted particularly high, so the local weather conditions will dictate the immediate effect.


A guy from Greenpeace is saying that 90cm of the core was exposed to air overnight (the pressure vessel is 22 metres tall, the core occupies about a quarter of that height)

EDIT: it's 3.6 metres in Fukushima-Daiichi 1
Found a nice schematic here. It's missing the auxiliary and ordinary shut-down cooling loops, which are what failed after it shut down.
 
Last edited:
Hundreds. A VERY small percentage.

10 years after it happened and sheep are still affected was the point i was making yes its small but they are still affected ain't they.

also that's hundreds have failed radioactive tests it don't say how many barely passed the test.
 
can someone in a very simple way answer my question please
is it harmful for people?! how is it gonna affect other country s & which country s

It Shouldn't be of any particular concern to anyone at the moment, should it be found that the reactor shell as ruptured then, perhaps we can start to consider it as potentially dangerous.
 
10 years after it happened and sheep are still affected was the point i was making yes its small but they are still affected ain't they.

also that's hundreds have failed radioactive tests it don't say how many barely passed the test.

None of these sheep 'barely pass' the test. Radioactivity occurs everywhere in nature, naturally, in tiny amounts. These animals either pass, or fail the test. There are none which are 'just safe' or 'affected but edible' ! Scaremongering is not helpful in situations such as this.
 
Today's winner of the "Zero Excrement, Sherlock" Award, Walt Patterson:

BBC: "Let's have a look at the explosion, what is your view of what happened?"
WP: "Well, there must have been something that blew up..."
 
Ohh it was "just" a hydrogen explosion. :rolleyes:

Do you think it makes it easier to cool the core now? For sure not. The meltdown is comming.

But: "One expert said he does not believe that a Chernobyl-style disaster will occur, citing the differences between the designs of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant and the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant. He speculated that any nuclear material released during the incident would likely be confined to the grounds in and around the power plant."

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_I_Nuclear_Power_Plant

Have they said anything about the other 2 cores, Fukushima 2 & 3?

"After the March 11, 2011, earthquake, Nuclear Engineering International reported that units 1 to 3 were automatically shut down, and units 4 to 6 were already in maintenance outages."

I assume the cooling system for the other 2 will also not work. Then it could be they are blowing up, too. :confused:
 
http://www.icjt.org/npp/foto/818_2.jpg Is the cooling loop that extra bit in this schematic?

No, it's not on there at all. It's on page 12 of this PDF. EDIT: that's a BWR/5, like Fukushima-Daiichi 2, 3, 4 and 5. No. 1 is a BWR/4 - the differences may explain why No.1 is in so much trouble and the others are coping so far.

From twitter, it seems it was a Hydrogen explosion. But, this was contained in the containment vessel, where the pressure vessel can be vented into the suppression pool. This would also explain why the containment vessel was rising in pressure earlier on, because they were venting the core continuously into the containment vessel, and is fairly sensible. Except that it ignited.

This means the cloud is still mostly water.

Source. EDIT: same as above.
 
Last edited:
Today's winner of the "Zero Excrement, Sherlock" Award, Walt Patterson:

BBC: "Let's have a look at the explosion, what is your view of what happened?"
WP: "Well, there must have been something that blew up..."

Haha, I immediately thought Harry Hill would pick this up.
 
None of these sheep 'barely pass' the test. Radioactivity occurs everywhere in nature, naturally, in tiny amounts. These animals either pass, or fail the test. There are none which are 'just safe' or 'affected but edible' ! Scaremongering is not helpful in situations such as this.

So please explain what they do with the one's that failed the test,
do we eat them to?

There has to be a limit where the test can go either way, otherwise its pointless doing the test, if its close to that fail point but not quite there, that's called barely passing the test

and i'm not scaremongering i'm trying to join in with a discussion
but i give up now.
 
and i'm not scaremongering i'm trying to join in with a discussion
but i give up now.

No need to give up :)
But copying partial stories from web sites without reading a good cross-section of stories/reports from anumber of different sources in order to get an overall 'real' view can sometimes be unhelpful.
Sure you meant well ;)

9500 people are missing.

It's really sad.
 
#
1149: A team from the National Institute of Radiological Sciences has been despatched to Fukushima as a precaution, reports NHK. It is reportedly made up of doctors, nurses and other individuals with expertise in dealing with radiation exposure, and has been taken by helicopter to a base 5km from the nuclear plant.
"Precaution", how can they still talk about "precaution"?
 
Back