So basically in your case, its exactly what I was asking:
Every time I've seen similar claims (for other brands even), its usually got some iffy basis about it that seems less practical and more "Not my (Insert whatever here)" so the "Stick to what you're good at" comment just really seemed to cement this being another one of those hence me bringing up the Tractors as you not once mentioned it and therefore I had no reason to suspect you did know (Likewise the Ferrari). Perfect example is all the moaning about the SC63 not being "a real Lambo" purely because it has a V8 as opposed to a V12 or V8 (Never mind Lamborghini literally having 3 previous models before the Urus even that also had V8s). I frankly have to ask where its even "fact" that its just a VAG group decided car and not just a grand opinion, its become known at the very least that the Porsche Cayanne was basically a product to keep the brand afloat (As if it takes a Committee to tell you "Yeah, you need to make a healthy profit or you're SOL") but where is any fact of it being a "Commitee" decision for the Urus? I'm not arguing that as an SUV its tall and heavy because
Gasp its what SUVs tend to be (Though in the first disagreement I have with
@Nielsen, I'd argue its by far one of the two least boring recent SUVs to look at thanks to the angles alongside the Ford Bronco that abandons the typical SUV blob and brings back the square shape but that just comes from me who in general just doesn't find modern SUVs appealing to start with regardless of who makes them or what powerplant is in them due to the fact that frankly they feel FAR too samey) but I have yet to see any substantial fact or truth behind this being a car designed by "Commitee". I guess what I'm questioning is this just a personal belief and not an opinion being pushed as fact, because its all too common to argue against something by doing the last bit.