I gotta admit the right man got the gig. I'm sure if I'd have been interviewing KY the transcript would be a tech nerd failfest about how they did the netcode and what challenges did multithread cell architecture throw up with this version of the franchise
i dont buy the story about manufacturers not allowing their car to be damaged.... look at (forgive me) Forza... it has both ferrari and porshce and incluldes damage on all cars.
Damage, is it really important? to me the culprit of all these heavily request is comes from US gamers after playing FPS đź‘Ž..btw congrats Superfla ..hmm just want to know is it GT5 comes with rain/wet race/ weather changing features?
To me, damage is important. For the game to be a true simulator it must be accounted for.
It's not a matter of choosing between the two. Between the two options you mention there are several variations possible. It doesn't mean cars have to be fully destructible or fully indestructible.In my opinion bulletproof cars vs destructibles is a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils.
It's not a matter of choosing between the two. Between the two options you mention there are several variations possible. It doesn't mean cars have to be fully destructible or fully indestructible.
But at the end, it seems like GT doesn't need damage. It's better without it. It could slightly ruin the game.
+1 đź‘Ť
Anytime I see people complaining about lack of damage I think to myself "careful what you wish for..."
GT is the "Real Driving Simulator" Damage will turn it onto the "Real sitting at the side of the road for 10 mins watching smoke pissing out your bonnet simulator"
I can't help thinking I'd enjoy that experience less
+1 đź‘Ť
GT is the "Real Driving Simulator" Damage will turn it onto the "Real sitting at the side of the road for 10 mins watching smoke pissing out your bonnet simulator"
As long as we have the option to turn damage, on/off, we should be ok.
+1 đź‘Ť
Anytime I see people complaining about lack of damage I think to myself "careful what you wish for..."
GT is the "Real Driving Simulator" Damage will turn it onto the "Real sitting at the side of the road for 10 mins watching smoke pissing out your bonnet simulator"
I can't help thinking I'd enjoy that experience less
I kinda feel that same way. I'm willing to bet those same people will through the remote down if that happens. I hate being wrecked on other racing games so I know it'll absolutely kill me if someone decides to knock fenders with me into the Casio triangle, sending me off into the barrier with my entire Right front suspension gone.
On a related side note - I've noticed a whole hell of a lot more quitters, giving up and parking at the side of the track now that PD has given us "No Mercy" mode.
I don't want to be the one to say "I told you so" but, well ... I did tell you so
Because some people would prefer to do so just because they like it better that way? So you don't like it, fine, turn it off or join only rooms having it disabled. For people who do like it, turn it on or join rooms that do have it enabled. I can certainly see this as an interesting feature in endurance races. Would I always use it? Probably not.That's my point tho. Other than competitions to see who could demolish a car in the coolest way, ala Burnout, when would you want to turn it on?
Me : what about the damage feature ? how far is it?
K.Y :thats also coming. the negotiations are taking place already. the only problem is that some manufacturer like porsche (NOTICE HE SAID PORSCHE, DOES THAT MEAN SOMTHING ALREADY HAPPINING) say's its ok to crash and total our cars we have no problem, and other manufacturer like Ferrari say's : we won't allow you to show some damage on our cars even if its the side view mirror damage .
Hey look the same retarded excuse they've been repeating like a mantra since forever (whilst other developers whose games include those same brands he's blabbing about have implemented damage ages ago), how surprising. I'm actually wondering why he didn't mention PS<insertnumberhere> limitations as well too this time around.
What a friggin failure of a software house, I'm just glad Sony have finally jumped the shark big time and can't rely on something like Microsoft endless funds to keep their company afloat without repercussions; since their gaming department has been bleeding money like there's no tomorrow for quite some time now PD is very likely to sink along with them in the near future.
Me : what about the damage feature ? how far is it?
K.Y :thats also coming. the negotiations are taking place already. the only problem is that some manufacturer like porsche (NOTICE HE SAID PORSCHE, DOES THAT MEAN SOMTHING ALREADY HAPPINING) say's its ok to crash and total our cars we have no problem, and other manufacturer like Ferrari say's : we won't allow you to show some damage on our cars even if its the side view mirror damage .
Hey look the same retarded excuse they've been repeating like a mantra since forever (whilst other developers whose games include those same brands he's blabbing about have implemented damage ages ago), how surprising. I'm actually wondering why he didn't mention PS<insertnumberhere> limitations as well too this time around.
What a friggin failure of a software house, I'm just glad Sony have finally jumped the shark big time and can't rely on something like Microsoft endless funds to keep their company afloat without repercussions; since their gaming department has been bleeding money like there's no tomorrow for quite some time now PD is very likely to sink along with them in the near future.