- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
delete double post
Last edited:
Let's be clear that it wasn't Jordan saying it; he just bought the piece of the puzzle to the table. 👍
The engine data transmission piece of the puzzle hasn't been thrown away. Just used judiciously for all concerned (including Wall Street.)
In addition it is now known that MAS did not purchase the other data transmission packages that were available for this plane, just the RR package.
If they had purchased the additional packages (which they apparently didn't, to keep the cost down, and because they were confident enough in the huge redundancies, active or otherwise, built into the 777) the jet would have been talking a lot more to the Ground.
It actually kind of makes sense...
Here's another plausible scenario, this one doesn't have any nefarious intentions.
Plane is on autopilot. Something caused the plane to rapidly decompress, quick enough so that everyone on board loses consciousness almost immediately but not enough to be from catastrophic structural failure. Pilots can't get masks on quick enough. However, plane can still fly, and plane is still on autopilot, so the plane keeps flying and flying until it runs out of fuel, and without fuel, and with no conscious flight crew to glide it down, the plane falls out of the sky into the middle of the ocean, undetected.
With this, there are still certain pieces of the puzzle that don't fit, and I obviously don't know if that is what happened (and I'm not sure if we will even truly ever know), but that to me seems at least plausible.
AT's theory of pilot suicide or rouge agents onboard taking control of the aircraft seems plausible as well.
I have a feeling that governments aren't sharing with each other and with the public all that they know, and that they are looking at the wrong places...
Looks like I found and read the wrong AD.
ABC World News is reporting the communications systems shut down at differing times. The data recording system went off at 1:07 am, and the transponder at 1:21 am. This is someone pulling circuit breakers, and not a catastrophic accident, they suggest.
It could be anywhere from the Himalayas to Australia, from North Korea to Diego Garcia.
It could be anywhere from the Himalayas to Australia
ABC World News is reporting the communications systems shut down at differing times. The data recording system went off at 1:07 am, and the transponder at 1:21 am. This is someone pulling circuit breakers, and not a catastrophic accident, they suggest.
It could be anywhere from the Himalayas to Australia, from North Korea to Diego Garcia.
Or a fire slowly creeping through the wires. If someone was pulling the circuit breakers out, why would they wait 14 minutes to do so?
All this speculation is making it sillier by the minute.
ABC World News is reporting the communications systems shut down at differing times. The data recording system went off at 1:07 am, and the transponder at 1:21 am. This is someone pulling circuit breakers, and not a catastrophic accident, they suggest.
Or a fire slowly creeping through the wires. If someone was pulling the circuit breakers out, why would they wait 14 minutes to do so?
All this speculation is making it sillier by the minute.
Slow fire actually still is a possibility. But to ask "why" is to speculate about about motivations, which is always a tricky business.
ABC World News is reporting the communications systems shut down at differing times. The data recording system went off at 1:07 am, and the transponder at 1:21 am. This is someone pulling circuit breakers, and not a catastrophic accident, they suggest.
It could be anywhere from the Himalayas to Australia, from North Korea to Diego Garcia.
I saw that, it's a bit misleading I think as the data transmissions are every 15 or 30 minutes, and are about 0.5s long, doesn't mean they stopped at the same time, just that their last broadcast was then.
Anyway I've figured it out, the plane is intact and I think I know where.
It's in Iran, and here's how it was done.
They flew it to a minor airport with the help of ATC, landed, refuelled, and flew on to Iran over northern Pakistan. Very easy indeed, if you do one simple thing. Well, two. Or three, actually.
File a fake flight plan that never takes off or lands. Assume the identity of the fake flight plan as you cross the handover. ATC will see your plot leave, new ATC will see your plot arrive. You don't exist either side of that, and if someone checks then you filed anyway. They won't check.
You don't even have to declare yourself as a 777 if you do the route right.
You DO need a systems engineer who knows the plane, but that's not so difficult to get hold of now. Especially when you promise them all the money in the world and then shoot them anyway.
But why kidnap Chinese? China has been one of Iran's biggest supporters outside Russia, and even buys their oil, despite UN Security Council resolutions.
Problem: The jet had 7 hours of fuel left when it vanished.I hate to mention that day in a theory but being serious for a minute... if terrirusts can pull the transponder/flight plan/ID trick to get the plane out (please someone tell me that can't work!) they can pull it to get the plane IN to another location. Maybe it's inbound now?
Problem: The jet had 7 hours of fuel left when it vanished.
Problem: The jet had 7 hours of fuel left when it vanished.
The reason they've released maps of the 4-more-hour range circle is because the plane had four more hours of fuel from the point it disappeared. Like @Grayfox said, airliners typically only carry enough fuel to get to their destination, plus deal with contingencies, plus legal reserves. There are numerous "categories" of fuel which are carried onboard from gate to gate but it's basically enough to get to where they're going.Problem: The jet had 7 hours of fuel left when it vanished.
Chinese seismologists are now stating that they picked up seismic wave activity in a non-seismic area of the China Sea - theory being it could be a place hitting the ocean.
http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/artic...ng-flight-expand-indian-ocean-mh370-satellite
Chinese seismologists are now stating that they picked up seismic wave activity in a non-seismic area of the China Sea - theory being it could be a place hitting the ocean.
http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/artic...ng-flight-expand-indian-ocean-mh370-satellite
Seismic wave activity, not seismic activity.The plane hitting the ocean wouldn't cause seismic activity since the water would absorb the shockwave.
So basically we were viewing an extended cut of lost...that's a bit sick on the Malaysian gov't part.
Yes, but maybe the sensors (designed to detect seismic activity) are refined enough to sense some little oddity that wasn't consistent with the "normal" ocean movements. In geek terms, a "disturbance in the Force".