As if I needed a reason to intensely dislike Casey Stoner - and let's be perfectly honest here: I really don't - he's just given me one. Yes, you're reading that right: Stoner genuinely believes that the only reason why Ducati hired Valentino Rossi - one of the most successful and natraully-talented men in the sport's history - was because Stoner left the team for Honda.
The 2010 Rossi wasn't exactly the Rossi of 2001-5. I think Rossi probably would've ended up at Ducati in any event, but had Stoner stayed, I doubt there would've been as much drive to sign a premier rider. So there's no confusion, Valentino Rossi is the best MotoGP rider of all time but it's a little hero worship to assume there was no correlation whatsoever between Stoner departing for Honda and Rossi coming to Ducati.
True, but my issue with Stoner is in the way he presents it. He just comes across as enormously big-headed.So there's no confusion, Valentino Rossi is the best MotoGP rider of all time but it's a little hero worship to assume there was no correlation whatsoever between Stoner departing for Honda and Rossi coming to Ducati.
True, but my issue with Stoner is in the way he presents it. He just comes across as enormously big-headed.
While we're Stoner hating I might change the subject. Toby and Jules just pointed out that Marc Marquez is 2nd in the Moto 2 championship, in his debut season, when he didn't score until Le Mans, fantastic.
And he's fastest in FP1...
MotoGP FP1 times below
1 Marco SIMONCELLI San Carlo Honda Gresini 1'48.987
(...)
Now if he could only get carefully into T1 in top 5, and then steadily apply that pace throughout the race, taking no big chances, he'd emerge in 1st position with a 5 or 10 second lead at the end.
Now if he could only get carefully into T1 in top 5, and then steadily apply that pace throughout the race, taking no big chances, he'd emerge in 1st position with a 5 or 10 second lead at the end.
If only 6's were 9's... but seriously, maybe this will be the race where Simoncelli finally puts together a decent result. You can't teach speed, but a rider can develop consistency. I still remember Stoner DNF'ing, what, 5-6 times when he was with LCR Honda? Admittedly, it wasn't borderline recklessness on his part the way it might be with Simoncelli, but the premise is still the same.
Rossi twelfth... the GP11.1 needs a LOT of work.
As for the race (double posting, since it's a different subject), and trying not to spoil it, these are the things I found worthy of notice:
Lorenzo at his best. Good bike, and a perfect intelligent race from him.
Stoner complaining (getting usual)... apparently they made a mistake in tire pressure. But I find it interesting that it only affected performance later in the race, not right from the beginning as he said. Sounded a lot like a sore looser.
Good result and performance from Dovi.
Simoncelli was extremely careful at the beginning and perfect (in aggressiveness) throughout his battle with Spies.
Rossi was on a charge. He was pushing that Ducati, learning and becoming faster lap after lap. Great result, considering.
But this was the best moment IMO:
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/JbnR6T0A_pY/
Spies comes from behind, brakes late and on the outside of Simoncelli. My thoughts went from:
1 He's stronger on the brakes, he's gonna try and pass across Sic's front and this is going to end badly... (Sic/Pedorsa clash came to mind)
2 Sic is defending beyond bike/rider braking capabilities and this is gonna end badly... (Rossi/Stoner crash came to mind)
3 AWESOME SPIES! Just outsmarted Sic!
The way I see it, after Sic closed the inside line in the straight, he just decided to "push" Sic from the outside. He was expecting him to (among other possible scenarios that run through their minds in these moments) go wide defending. And he intended to make that cross behind him into the apex as soon as he saw him braking sideways. Beautifully done, and on purpose.
On a less positive note, Hayden had a good pace but messed it up. Cal can't seam to deal with the front of his bike. Destroyed the front tire last race, and today he abandoned in fear of falling (shoulder injury - smart decision) from low front end grip. If he doesn't adapt, he won't finish a race
I think the Yamahas can tilt way more than the other bikes, and both their drivers are able to make the most of it. Both Lorenzo overtakes happened where no one else dared to do it, and Spies is getting used to it as well.
They can brake later because they can brake further into the corners, and carry more speed over them without destroying the front tire I think. Different bikes, different lines, excellent riders, equals great races.
I don't think it's so much a question of lean angle. The Yamaha still has superb front end feel (and Lorenzo can run it really really deep) but I tend to believe Stoner when he says it was a tire pressure issue. The Honda seems to do everything just about as well as the Yamaha.
The problem (for Yamaha) is that the Honda can definitely dig its way out the corners noticeably better than the Yamaha, which translates into superior top speed on the straights.
I have to agree. It's a very good assessment. They just dive into to the corners so committed and inclined, that the Yamahas look like they can take so much more speed and inclination.
We're halfway through the calendar, so how about a little progress report? What are your picks for...
• Most impressed?
• Most improved?
• On the rise?
• On the decline?
That relates to all three levels of MotoGP, so feel free to mix up the commentary if you so choose. So if you wish to talk about the season so far, feel free to chat.
Well, I think Emmett & Harris said the Yamaha is suited to fast, flowing tracks like well... Assen and Mugello and the Honda is good for stop & start tracks like Estoril and Catalunya. Problem is, of the rest of the tracks on the calendar, I'm not sure which ones left are fast & swoopy, except San Marino? Maybe Laguna Seca?