opelgt1969
Premium
- 2,251
- Bristol,Va USA
- opelgt1969
This debate question is not a reflection of a thought or belief I have. Instead, it's a question I just want to ask for your opinions for:
John's Debate! - Divine Intervention?
I have a feeling that some people would think that wins earned because of a rain delay aren't earned. Maybe I think of... okay. There are classical thinkers, then there are the hardcore thinkers. The hardcore types would be like, "Kurt Busch isn't supposed to win this race just because of the rain." A race ended by rain usually means that a driver will win the race for leading at that time as well as whomever have placed well. Former WoO (or sprint car?) star J.J. Yeley was one of the top 5 members. So what I'm asking you all is... do you think wins are earned when stopped by a rain delay? Are you one of the people who think certain racers shouldn't even have placed high enough, but ended up placing high because of the rain delay? Do you think leading at a certain time of the race and eventually FINISHING in that position after rain is an earned victory? And do you think races stopped by rain should be resumed in the future to complete the actual race distance?
I have a strange "ability" to predict what people will say about things. Usually predicting something bad. Like I could imagine some people saying that Danica Patrick shouldn't have won at Motegi earlier this year because of a fuel race. Fact is... she won, didn't she? Some people probably think someone else could have won. Some hardcore types think that even if Dick Trickle was leading a race as leaders were having pit stops and with the race stopped by rain, that Dick Trickle didn't earn the victory (according to hardcore critics). Fact is, the field is frozen in situations like this. Whomever is in the lead and placed highly will keep their positions. Congratulations to the Top 5 from this race.
Up next... Daytona! That track you never saw coming when Gran Turismo 5: Prologue was released. Let speculation begin!
Just for the fun of it I just went to NASCAR.com and looked at some of "King Richard's" stats. None showed races won because of rain. So in 5 years it all depends on wheater you remember that a certain race was a rain out or not. In my opinion it's a race win as long as nascar tries to run the whole race.