- 26,628
- OREGON
- a6m5zero
I think you may be underestimating match-ups in the NBA(or basketball in general). Match-ups are why NBA are unwatchable at times. After few games in, most of the time(granted, not always), you start to see which team has whose number. Sure, regular season might show this & that, which is routine in the NBA. Comes Playoffs, and you can pretty much tell who & when start the crumbling. I couldn't even come close to your perspective that the OKC has far better chance than the Lakers. What I saw was OKC getting beat bad in the Finals.Oklahoma has a better chance of defeating the Heat than LA does by far. The Lakers starting 5 is a superstar lineup, but even I can't rule out the lethal weapon that is Kevin Durant; the guy just walks up to the 3-point line, shoots, makes it. Play defense, & repeat.
If Russell & Ibaka are on their game, the Thunder becomes a very tough team. If I remember correctly, they were close to being undefeated at their home.
I'll give it a fair thought though that the Lakers' chemistry remains to be see, but as mentioned earlier, Howard's still injured, so it's going to take a few games for Kobe & Nash to develop chemistry & then another few games when Howard returns.
If Durant is a lethal weapon, LeBron James is nuclear. I will admit that I didn't take into account that last year's young OKC team is year older this season. But Durant's ability to make a three proves absolutely nothing for me. Making 3 is one of the many offensive qualities. LeBron can break double & triple team at times. You mix finding the open man into that, that's when teams start becoming unbeatable. I need to see more of that from Durant for me to buy into the hype.
As far as the Lakers chemistry, I'm not even worried about the first half of the season. It's all about April-on. It's a gamble. It's mad science. Lakers could be epic triumpgh, epic failure, but most likely just another strong team with lots of holes. It remains to be seen. I hope for the best, but at least for now, I'm just praying on the prospect. I rather have two teams with realistic chance of winning the Finals than one. Unless something drastic happens, I see OKC chance of beating Miami at pretty much ZERO.
I will be honest with you, we saw last year's Finals in very different light. What I observed was LeBron finally doing what was expected of him for last maybe three, four seasons: Take over.Let's be honest. What we saw was LeBron at his best with a little help from Bosh & Wade, & 1 player who was on a 3-point shooting streak.
I think if that Chalmers, Miller, or Battier had not had the games they did, the outcome of the Finals could have easily swayed in the Thunder's favor. That does go for On-Off Westbrook though, to be fair.
In order to take over, you have to be active. LeBron of old was to turn passive, then delegate somewhat, or disappear completely. For me, he finally seemed to have risen to the occasion, because he's always been that talented. Unbelievably gifted & talented.
Sure, if he didn't have help from outside, they would have struggled. But really, square-up jump shooting is so typical at this level(Finals), I really didn't see the significance. Exactly why I'm so frustrated by their addition of Ray Allen. If you thought those slowass shooters stepped it up last year, you better hope Allen's ankle bother him to a point he'll be as slow in this year's Finals.