To say nothing of La chicane de la mort at Dragon Trail.I can't imagine the FIA being happy with the new Grand Valley.
To say nothing of La chicane de la mort at Dragon Trail.I can't imagine the FIA being happy with the new Grand Valley.
I can't imagine the FIA sparing even one brain cell on something that has absolutely nothing to do with them.I can't imagine the FIA being happy with the new Grand Valley.
Did mattikake brainwash you too?I can't imagine the FIA being happy with the new Grand Valley.
VR turns that chicane into a truly easy corner.To say nothing of La chicane de la mort at Dragon Trail.
Exactly. I vaguely recall some marketing spiel in the GT Sport days along the lines of "the new fictional circuits are designed with FIA regulations in mind". Not that the FIA actually graded them (or had anything to do with the design).I can't imagine the FIA sparing even one brain cell on something that has absolutely nothing to do with them.
I was talking about the layout and general design. All the tracks got tiny updates like that between Gt5 and 6 too.Not true. They've not only changed textures on trackside signage, but they added more props since GT5 days, and they also changed the track lights. In GT6 the lights were blue, in GTS/7 they are yellow.
How does one redesign a massive straight though?I was talking about the layout and general design. All the tracks got tiny updates like that between Gt5 and 6 too.
Cafe and garage in the same space is better ideaI think we get a new track and suzuka update.
But if they really was about the life... We would get A-Spec mode, massive single player overhaul, and cafe would be the side mission portion of the game.
In dreams - Roy Orbison
Speaking from experience, more content doesn’t improve a game. It will add more variety, but fundamentally it’s the same game whether it has 500 cars or 800 cars.
Truth to that.It sure improve my enjoyment of the game With more cars, specially with all the great cars we get this month
Didn’t know you had to say it in the first place but I guess you are running out of negative things to say to resort to this petty nonsenseDidn't know this needed to be spelled out.
And here's the issue... you always say vague things without anything behind it, so this is what was said:I vaguely recall some marketing spiel in the GT Sport days along the lines of "the new fictional circuits are designed with FIA regulations in mind". Not that the FIA actually graded them (or had anything to do with the design).
Pointing out that the FIA had no involvement in the design of fantasy tracks with Grand Valley being an obvious example is being petty?Didn’t know you had to say it in the first place but I guess you are running out of negative things to say to resort to this petty nonsense
Pointing out that the FIA had no involvement in the design of fantasy tracks with Grand Valley being an obvious example is being petty?
Nice try but these are not the same thing,I can't imagine the FIA being happy with the new Grand Valley.
If the fantasy tracks had to meet FIA certification (as some seem to genuinely believe), Grand Valley wouldn't exist in its current form. I can't imagine the FIA being happy with boulders lining the sides of the track and run off areas that end in a cliff dive.You post is implying that if the FIA were involved they would not be happy to approve Grand Valley as a race track, it is not pointing out they didn't have involvement,
You tried to be negative as you always are and it's backfired
Have you ever seen world rally championship races?If the fantasy tracks had to meet FIA certification (as some seem to genuinely believe), Grand Valley wouldn't exist in its current form. I can't imagine the FIA being happy with boulders lining the sides of the track and run off areas that end in a cliff dive.
I don't think the WRC stages fall under the same grading as circuits. 99% sure Grand Valley is intended as a circuit and not a rally stage.Have you ever seen world rally championship races?
They are seemingly happy for both of those things....
I think the implication was that if the FIA were involved, we wouldn't have got the new Grand Valley track as it is.Nice try but these are not the same thing,
You post is implying that if the FIA were involved they would not be happy to approve Grand Valley as a race track, it is not pointing out they didn't have involvement,
You tried to be negative as you always are and it's backfired
Not at the moment, but Kaz said the partnership could return.After watching the GT movies, FIA involvement is purely name only...Are they even working at the GT World Series events?
We're those tracks influenced by the FIA partnership though? Or by the fact the game was eSports focused? One is not dependant on the other, GT Sport would have been an eSports title even if the FIA had no interest in a partnership with Polyphony. So would the circuits have ever been designed any differently?The FIA partnership but not FIA organization influenced track design because GT sport' was E sport focused and this E sport focus was crucial to securing a FIA partnership . PD wanted to make tracks that were suitable to E sports and crushed that goal with all of the new tracks
The new tracks are designed to have more clean overtake possibilities that cater to E sports / Online racing.
I don't think PD anticipated FIA and them to part ways and the tracks were already in development and PD may just also want to have tracks designed to suit online racing.
The whole safety argument or FIA directly influencing the design is bogus though . Tokyo expressway would never get approved nor would Grand Valley or Trail Mountain .
It isn't speculation, it's right from the horses mouth.All these speculative posts about FIA and not a single word from our resident FIA expert. Maybe we can put that discussion on the back burner until we get the truth?
Unfortunately, people see what they want to see and disregard the rest.Apparently because the silhouettes contained 1 whooping electric car that people hate (and/or aNoTheR sKyliNe hurr durr..) instead of focusing on the other 5 that are fan favourite.
Maybe through 2024-2025Not at the moment, but Kaz said the partnership could return.
I don't hate that eclectic car...sorry electric car.Apparently because the silhouettes contained 1 whooping electric car that people hate (