New Update Coming 03/10/2019
- Thread starter Rizla
- 121 comments
- 20,395 views
- Status
- 333
- New York
- Bandit_Ra_X
Could this finally be the update to add SPA-ce Kart, a.k.a. Kart Space, is returning?!
GTV0819
(Banned)
- 6,084
- Papua New Guinea
The least thing people could do to avoid huge disappointment.
- 669
- Florida
- scorfano913
I feel like a new intro is going to come with GT Sport Spec II, which is coming on Friday. I think they are updating the original GT Sport, so it can have the intro too. I don’t know, those are just my thoughts.
- 98
- Alabama, USA
- Christopher12284
- Christopher0184
- 374
- Brazil
We had a content update a week ago, so I guess the Taycan'll only arrive at the end of the month.
- 16,090
- Melbourne
- ScottPuss20
- CheetahsMeow
- 7,073
- Birmingham, UK
- GOTMAXPOWER
Space Kart? You must mean the Moon Buggy, Lunar Rover and Moon circuit confirmed!
I'm partially joking but 99% thinking how cool that was back on GT6 and how no future Gran Turismo will be complete without it.
- 333
- New York
- Bandit_Ra_X
BjoBosUndies
(Banned)
- 226
- Australia
People in here blow their loads too quickly when it comes to all things GT. You’re significant other would be disappointed in you all if you perform like this in real life.
Considering the Tokyo event is this month wouldn’t it make more sense for an “unveil” of any new content to happen there, then release at the end of the month?
Considering the Tokyo event is this month wouldn’t it make more sense for an “unveil” of any new content to happen there, then release at the end of the month?
GTV0819
(Banned)
- 6,084
- Papua New Guinea
Probably to inform people, I guess? đź’ˇ
- 5,845
- Dublin
- Paul2007
I see the whole Spa-Francorchamps debacle as something of an anomaly but, if another circuit is latched on to, my guess is Deep Forest. It's a series classic we know it's being worked on so it is a strong candidate.I'm curious to see what track people will hang their hats on once SPA finally does come to GTSport.
BjoBosUndies
(Banned)
- 226
- Australia
I think the reason we get a lot of filler conversation and wishlists based around update threads has to do with the moderators’ selection of stories and pinning the same open thread to a brand new story.
I understand creating traffic = dollars for this site, but at times their choice of news lacks bang for buck.
I understand creating traffic = dollars for this site, but at times their choice of news lacks bang for buck.
Last edited:
- 94
- United Kingdom
Seriously going to be some disappointed folk when they realise this is just a bug fix update just like every other month!
- 86,793
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Firstly, what?
Secondly, the moderators have nothing to do with the site's news section. Indeed no moderators are also writers.
Thirdly, do you think that the largest Gran Turismo news outlet in existence should not be reporting on the news of a new edition of or update to Gran Turismo (and explaining what it is and isn't, clearly, so there's no confusion) - in this case an update that their game is notifying them of when they log in?
Fourthly, news comments threads are tied into existing comments threads - where they exist - because they are where the conversation is already happening, thus minimising duplication, and to drop in the news article stating the facts about the subject so that conversation participants can avoid confusion. No-one who's actually read the article we put in here - which is actually a thread plus posts moved from a second thread - would be hyped for anything at all.
Finally... what? We have an entire forum for people to post things they want in the games precisely because people can't stop themselves from posting wishlists anywhere they can (because for some reason they think that what's important to them [and will occupy them for four minutes until the next thing] is actually important, and going on about it will get them what they want). It happens even on Gran Turismo's own official feeds too, and Kazunori Yamauchi's. Pretty sure they're not inspired by our articles.
Do you think if we hadn't put up an article about it, this thread - which started two hours before I even woke up that day, and three before I wrote the article - would have no self-hyped comments about the update's potential content? Given that there's four hopeful posts in here about Spa, Spec II and the Taycan before the article even went live?
Last edited:
JayRS200
(Banned)
- 536
- Finland
You are speaking from experience I surmise.
BjoBosUndies
(Banned)
- 226
- Australia
Great reply bro. Let me break it down again just for you.
First paragraph was a summary of the types of people in here that get too excited before they have even seen what the update is.
Second paragraph uses logic and suggests a more sensible approach to waiting for update content. No brainer, as FIA events have generally been the way they have shown future update content.
- 332
- South Africa
- Riptide065
- LMP Riptide
If this forum is reserved for logic and a "sensible approach", I doubt if it will keep it's popularity or have the traffic it does. As long as the moderators keep it civil and organised within the forum rules [which I believe they do], members should be free to add whatever they think is a valued contribution. Others should read it like a newspaper - read the articles that interest you and ignore the ones that irritates you. BUT to criticize the journalist or Editor is just as senseless as a non sensible contribution.
- 3,384
- Las Vegas
- dawko-san
- 162
- France
In this week's mile points exchange there were some rims I had never seen in 2 years. Did they just add them or was I late on some models?
@BjoBosUndies I think @JayRS200 was specifically referring to this when he surmised you speak from experience.
A silly joke but somewhat humourous nonetheless.
- Status
Similar threads
