- 862
- Northamptonshire
- Ryanswannell
I dunno, but what if a male in North Korea is bald? That's probably going to land him, his kids and their kids in a death camp I presume?Are they all required to wear masks of him as well?
I dunno, but what if a male in North Korea is bald? That's probably going to land him, his kids and their kids in a death camp I presume?Are they all required to wear masks of him as well?
Are they all required to wear masks of him as well?
Yes. Australia. North Korea might be backwards, but at least they're consistent. We're at an all-time low as to how we're being run.
I was thinking more about the way they all seem more interested in boosting their own profiles than actually representing their constituents. Nick Xenophon is probably the only decent politician at the federal level.We've gone back to knights and dames and the one that chooses them is the PM himself.
Xenophon.
I am sure he is just as his last name implies, afraid of someone that is different
Turkmenistan, for a while.Is there a worse run country than N.K on this planet?
How did his power trip end?Turkmenistan, for a while.
Saparmurat Niyazov Turkmenbasy renamed days of the week and months of the year after himself and his family, he banned dogs from the country's capital because they didn't smell right, he outlawed ballet and the circus, he banned libraries - believing that the only books the Turkmen people needed to read were the Qu'ran and his own Ruhnama - and he made lip-synching illegal. He also had a 250 foot marble arch built with a 40 foot gold statue of himself that rotated to always face the sun - along with a 40 foot gold pyramid and an ice palace.
Oh and he effectively banned the internet, allowing only Turkmen Telecom to provide it. Which was, of course, state owned.
http://news.yahoo.com/japan-orders-...14--sector.html;_ylt=AwrBJSCofj9TaTQAkX_QtDMD
Rumor that recently installed militarist Japanese PM Abe has ordered his navy to shoot down any new North Korean missile launches.
It is widely known that NK periodically launches missiles over the sea for test and propaganda purposes. Perhaps the flame and roar of missile tests help the NK's to feel better about about themselves? But with Japan's new militarism, is the stage now set for accidental or deliberate war between Japan and North Korea? How is it that the Japanese, humbled and enforced into pacifism by WWII, now take it upon themselves to initiate a new, potentially nuclear war? Should Uncle Sam encourage or restrain such hostilities?
Japan know they have the upper hand here though as any war will bring America in on there side. If America refuse then bye bye US bases in Japan.http://news.yahoo.com/japan-orders-...14--sector.html;_ylt=AwrBJSCofj9TaTQAkX_QtDMD
Rumor that recently installed militarist Japanese PM Abe has ordered his navy to shoot down any new North Korean missile launches.
It is widely known that NK periodically launches missiles over the sea for test and propaganda purposes. Perhaps the flame and roar of missile tests help the NK's to feel better about about themselves? But with Japan's new militarism, is the stage now set for accidental or deliberate war between Japan and North Korea? How is it that the Japanese, humbled and enforced into pacifism by WWII, now take it upon themselves to initiate a new, potentially nuclear war? Should Uncle Sam encourage or restrain such hostilities?
Bolded part is an act of war. Regardless of why.Also where did they mention war? They just mentioned shooting down missiles.
Still where did they mention going to war? An act of aggression like that is unlikely to get a full scale response seeing the advantage Japan has. It would likely take an invasion to bring out the measures being talked about.Bolded part is an act of war. Regardless of why.
The article didn't mention going to war at all, @Dotini did. He can be a bit, shall we say, alarmist at times.Still where did they mention going to war? An act of aggression like that is unlikely to get a full scale response seeing the advantage Japan has. It would likely take an invasion to bring out the measures being talked about.
At least I'm not the only one who has noticedThe article didn't mention going to war at all, @Dotini did. He can be a bit, shall we say, alarmist at times.
How do you figure? Both coveting the UN seat & concern with North Korea are ongoing issues with Japan. Ongoing for many decades.I don't believe Japan actually care about North Korea at the moment. I think they are trying to justify their argument that they should have a spot on the UN security council.
How isn't it that being humbled and forced into pacifism won't eventually have negative consequences? It took Germany two tries to figure it out and once again they're in a dominant position in Europe, at least economically. What about Russia? I'm surprised it took Japan this long to grow some balls.How is it that the Japanese, humbled and enforced into pacifism by WWII, now take it upon themselves to initiate a new, potentially nuclear war?
Uncle Sam should shut up because he's had too much to drink.Should Uncle Sam encourage or restrain such hostilities?
I don't understand. Are you implying that, due to your theory, Japanese Government, or the Self-Defense Force may violate the Constitution & attack North Korea?I'm also concerned about the health of the Japanese national psyche. Prolonged economic stagnation, malaise amongst young males, Chinese territorial depredations and the ongoing nightmare of Fukushima all tear at the self-confidence and mental health of the Japanese culture.
In such circumstances, fear, distrust and paranoia may become magnified. Poor judgment, hasty reactions and miscalculations can have negative global effects. Particularly when entangling treaties and alliances can draw in other actors to the psychodrama, however unwillingly.
Disclaimer: The foregoing is only my opinion. I don't believe in right or wrong, good or bad, but rather in shades in gray and an amusing story.
No. I'm implying that fooling around with bombs and missiles may get two confused parties into unnecessary conflict.I don't understand. Are you implying that, due to your theory, Japanese Government, or the Self-Defense Force may violate the Constitution & attack North Korea?
I see pushing, pushing, then more pushing coming from just one side, but I do have a dog in the fight. Is it considered fooling around when you are shooting down a missile/rocket that's about to hit your country?No. I'm implying that fooling around with bombs and missiles may get two confused parties into unnecessary conflict.
Isn't it more like blocking an attack from an assailant?It takes two to tango.