Obama Presidency Discussion Thread

How would you vote in the 2008 US Presidential Election?

  • Obama-Biden (Democrat)

    Votes: 67 59.3%
  • McCain-Palin (Republican)

    Votes: 18 15.9%
  • Barr-Root (Libertarian)

    Votes: 14 12.4%
  • Nader-Gonzales (Independent-Ecology Party / Peace and Freedom Party)

    Votes: 5 4.4%
  • McKinney-Clemente (Green)

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Baldwin-Castle (Constitution)

    Votes: 7 6.2%
  • Gurney-? (Car & Driver)

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Other...

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    113
  • Poll closed .
Reventón;3141208
McCain just won the election, if that's what you mean. If anything, the Hillary supporters who detest Obama, just found Sarah as their beacon of hope.

That depends on how you look at it. Considering that most of those voters were pro-choice, strong on woman's rights, demanded "experience" (however you wish to quantify it), Palin would quite literally be the polar opposite of Hillary. I mean, unless they're only voting on the existence of a vagina, then they are exactly the same.

I give a lot of credit to McCain and the GOP for making the choice, it is both ballsy and historic... But that doesn't make it a good one. Particularly when there are other women within the GOP that would have likely been a better choice (Kay Baily Hutchinson comes to mind). It was a nomination that sought to bring in those aforementioned female votes, and also to invigorate the evangelical base of the GOP. I can't disagree with the last one, but to really bring in the female votes? It is a double-edged sword, and while I think there are some women that could make up their mind on an issue like that, there are others who are going to feel like they've been hit over the head, and may in fact move far away from the choice completely.

I'm very interested to see what the poll numbers are going to look like, Obama managed to gain a slight lead on the national level at the close of the weekend. It is going to be a very tough campaign with a nomination like that, one that throws the arguement of experience against Obama out the window, while also leaving the political minefield of running against a woman out there as well. This will likely be something we'll study in Political Science classes for decades...
 
Last edited:
meghan-mccain.jpg


God damn, a Mac Book Pro, a Blackberry, and a Bud Light. Can't get any hawter than that.

On a side note: The rumors about the Palins are just despicable. The intellectual retards at dKos, HuffPo, and the social rejects at Digg just amaze me. Those on the Left, the base of the Democratic party, just create things out of thin air. One more reason why the Democrats will lose... again.

Damn, I'd give that a pre-emptive strike.

Word on the Palins, too. People are retarded. She's not so bad, as indicated below by Matt.

Sarah somebody is the opposite of what Hillary is.

Again, my stomach only turned a little when he picked her because that means that Joe Lieberman is probably going to be Sec. of State. :ill:

I feel Obama's VP on the other hand is a great pick.

Why? Because he's Obama's VP?

Reventón;3141208
Obama preaches change, and then he picks a VP whose been in office since 1973. :rolleyes

Not to mention the guy with the same dangerous globetrotting foreign policy-- the architect of our Balkan involvement and a proponent of the Iraqi war.

Someone I was discussing politics with made a comment on this. He said that that part of the 16th Amendment meant that the taxes had to apply across the country evenly rather than being uniform based on wages. Any help on this? I dunno which one is right.

No, Congress's section of the Constitution only lets them tax if it's evenly apportioned. The 16th amendment is the loophole found by Woodrow Wilson & Co. which says pretty much the opposite. I don't know the truth, but I'm guessing that the founding fathers never could have conceived of the people falling for such a thing as an income tax, and thus thought it a waste of time to expressly forbid in the document. The early 1900s were a really messed up time, politically.
 
I don't know, man. Bristol Palin is only 17. Not legal... not even in Alaska.
Shame she is five months pregnant, then...

I find it rather amazing that these folk even bother to read anything from "the blogosphere"... given that their real lives are complicated enough, I don't see why unmoderated comments from anyone who has an internet connection should be used for or against either candidate.
 
The point I was trying to make was that if Hillary voters vote Republican simply because a Palin is on the ticket then women are idiots.

And second, McCain is an old fart.

I wonder what effect having a preggers daughter will have on Palin. I'll be tired of the coverage this gets real soon I imagine.
 
The point I was trying to make was that if Hillary voters vote Republican simply because a Palin is on the ticket then women are idiots.
And? Quite a few of Obama's sheep will be doing the same just because his name is on the ticket.
 
Reventón;3142194
And? Quite a few of Obama's sheep will be doing the same just because his name is on the ticket.

I assume that you're making the reference that because he is black he will get black votes? Or that women generally vote Democrat?

Otherwise, I'm not completely sure what you meant.
 
I assume that you're making the reference that because he is black he will get black votes? Or that women generally vote Democrat?

Otherwise, I'm not completely sure what you meant.
I actually meant that people will be voting for him just because he's "hip & cool" and "is preaching change!", instead of voting for him based on his ideas & plans.

In other words, instead of, "I'm voting for Obama because he has great ideas", some morons will be along the lines of "I'm voting for Obama because it's the cool thing for kids to do!"
 
Yeah, unfortunately that's going to happen with either candidate. Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit befuddled.
 
Yeah, unfortunately that's going to happen with either candidate. Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit befuddled.

McCain, hip & cool? I'll take your word for it.

Unless there's a different interpretation of "hip & cool" ...
 
Shame she is five months pregnant, then...

I know, right? Someone already beat you to it, keef. :)

I find it rather amazing that these folk even bother to read anything from "the blogosphere"... given that their real lives are complicated enough, I don't see why unmoderated comments from anyone who has an internet connection should be used for or against either candidate.

Un-moderated comments and the actual bloggers themselves.
 
McCain, hip & cool? I'll take your word for it.

Like, the girl from The Hills is like, totally, like supporting him. That, like, makes him cool, right?

There was an article in Entertainment Weekly a few weeks back about what McCain and Obama are into when it comes to movies, music and books and I found it to be rather funny. While I do agree with a lot of the stuff that McCain picked as something I'd enjoy as well, there is definitely a bit of a "gap" between his tastes and Obama's, which are far more contemporary.

Unfortunately I'm unable to find the Interweb version of the story...
 
Last edited:
Wait, Mccain seriously picked Palin, knowing that her daughter was pregnant?? someone mind doing the task of explaining to this 16 year old on how this was a "smart" idea? Especially since Palin is a pro-abstinence christian
 
Last edited:
Why does it matter? It doesn’t mean she’s a bad mother, and it doesn’t mean she’s a bad policy-maker.
 
: shrugs : There aren't too many in religion that can do what they preach so doesn't matter. No pun intended, oh... wait, who am I kidding.
 
well, i think its a big deal to the majority of southern voters

Because if you're from the south, it means you're some kind of bible-thumping morals crusader, right?

Yeah, unfortunately that's going to happen with either candidate. Thanks for clearing that up, I was a bit befuddled.

Fortunately, Bob Barr is hipper than hop.
 

There we go! Thanks for finding it... I was having a hard time finding my hard-copy as well.

Sage
Why does it matter? It doesn’t mean she’s a bad mother, and it doesn’t mean she’s a bad policy-maker.

The arguement would likely be that for someone who is touting family values so strongly, it just seems a bit "odd" that her daughter is 17 and having a child out of wedlock (they do plan to marry, however). It goes against what they would normally rally against, pre-marital sex, abstinence, etc. The key here would be if or how they are able to turn it into something positive, but I'm currently uncertain of what the best way of doing it would be.

At least for me, the announcement comes as more of a positive than a negative. People who are following the campaign closely know that there was a pretty nasty rumor circulating around the internet that Palin's baby was not her's, but her daughters, which could have been a HUGE powderkeg within itself. While it would have been a dramatically interesting story if true, it was a dirty play, and announcing that her daughter is preggers avoids what could have been a very dangerous situation. I'm thankful that Obama has taken matters into his own hands, saying that the issues with families is "off the table," telling everyone to "back off," with major consequences if the rumors continue.
 
Getting pregnant at 17 and out-of-wedlock was a bad idea, but it's not her mother's fault that she made a bad decision. I don't see why Governor Palin should be held accountable for her daughter's mistake. It could be claimed that Palin could have raised her daughter better, but then again, nobody's perfect.

Palin might be pro-family, but her daughter is a teenager, and teenagers have been known to not make the wisest decisions. I think it'd be a much bigger blow to the Republicans if Palin, who described herself "as pro-life as any candidate can be," had allowed her daughter to abort the baby. That would probably end all hope for the Republicans in the election.

Also, I'm curious as to exactly why McCain chose Palin as his running mate. I'm certain it has a lot to do with her ideals, but I wonder if he chose her because she might bring over those older female Democrats who're unhappy that Hillary didn't win the nomination or get picked as VP. Thoughts?
 
Also, I'm curious as to exactly why McCain chose Palin as his running mate. I'm certain it has a lot to do with her ideals, but I wonder if he chose her because she might bring over those older female Democrats who're unhappy that Hillary didn't win the nomination or get picked as VP. Thoughts?

Despite studying politics at school for the last three years, combined with my long-lived interest in them, suffice to say, I don't have a good answer. It seems fairly clear that the nomination does two primary things:

1) Invigorate the conservative, evangelical base who care primarily of social issues (abortion, religion, family values, etc), not to mention the obvious leans on domestic and foreign policies. It is a good play if you're focused only on that, something that strong conservatives pushed for with the Palin nomination.

2) Keep the "Maverick" train rolling. Palin herself, as well as Candidate McCain have both made the argument that she will do "what is right" despite what her party believes. This, of course, depends on what you're looking at and what perspective you're looking at her from.

3) To bring in the female voters, and certainly, to mix up the "historic" ticket issue a bit more. Hillary left the door open for it to happen, as Palin clearly pointed out, and it certainly may effect some people in their decision.

The problem with all of it is that while there are those distinct positives, there are negatives as well. It throws the "experience" factor for Obama completely out the window (Palin was mayor of a small town and has served as the governor in Alaska for less than two years), and quite easily throws a wrench in that history issue as well. The big deal here is whether or not it will actually bring in female voters or not. Making modest generalizations, more women vote than men, but generally speaking women are more likely to vote Democrat, and with Palin not necessarily representing issues in the light at which women may care to see the issues, it may set those people who had considered voting for McCain against the idea completely... Be it for Obama or for a third party.

Another side to the entire issue is whether or not it was even McCain's decision at all. It seemed fairly clear for some time that he was leaning towards his friend Joe Liberman, not to mention his former adversary Mitt Romney. Depending on what you read or who you believe, the rumors are that he was pressured into the Palin choice because Liberman would have been disastrous for the base, Romney (despite being a strong way to gain my state of Michigan) would have likely gotten heat over his "flip flopping" on the issues.

What the entire situation comes down to is that while it was a ballsy move, it doesn't automatically make it a good one. It will be interesting to see how things unfold in the coming weeks, particularly when Liberals view it as rather stupid, and Conservatives seeing it as something of a brilliant idea.

Part of the problem is that we're, what, four days out from the original announcement? Not to mention the fact that not many people know much about her? As time passes, I'm sure that we'll know a lot more soon enough...
 
Palin was McCain's try for Paul and Hillary voters. It's not working.

She was also the key to getting McCain some publicity. I don't know about everyone else, but Obama is on the damn TV non-stop over here. It's like a cascading propaganda-fest. However, nobody has shut up about Palin (and, by proxy, McCain) since McCain chose her.

The media is the pier to the great pond of uninformed voters. Winning votes based on a platform and principles is done during the primaries. Now that McCain almost has the official nomination (don't get me wrong-- I'm still praying for a miracle), it's time to play idiot-catcher.
 
Last edited:
Getting pregnant at 17 and out-of-wedlock was a bad idea, but it's not her mother's fault that she made a bad decision. I don't see why Governor Palin should be held accountable for her daughter's mistake. It could be claimed that Palin could have raised her daughter better, but then again, nobody's perfect.

How can you preach abstinence to the masses when you can't get your own daughter to follow suit?
 
Wait, Mccain seriously picked Palin, knowing that her daughter was pregnant?? someone mind doing the task of explaining to this 16 year old on how this was a "smart" idea? Especially since Palin is a pro-abstinence christian
She is also pro-life.

well, i think its a big deal to the majority of southern voters
Yeah, because that barefoot and pregnant sterotype we have came from nowhere. By the time I graduated high school five girls, out of 118 students, in my class had babies, including the class president. Oh, and all of them attended church regularly and were quick to judge anyone that did something they didn't see as "good."

It isn't as if the bible belt is the land of pure abstinence. Despite your stereotype, it means nothing in the south to anyone under the age of 60.

The arguement would likely be that for someone who is touting family values so strongly, it just seems a bit "odd" that her daughter is 17 and having a child out of wedlock (they do plan to marry, however). It goes against what they would normally rally against, pre-marital sex, abstinence, etc. The key here would be if or how they are able to turn it into something positive, but I'm currently uncertain of what the best way of doing it would be.
I believe Obama said it best when he said it was a non-issue. I saw him on Good Morning America this morning saying that his mother was 18 when he was born and he refuses to judge Governor Palin on this.

Getting pregnant at 17 and out-of-wedlock was a bad idea, but it's not her mother's fault that she made a bad decision. I don't see why Governor Palin should be held accountable for her daughter's mistake. It could be claimed that Palin could have raised her daughter better, but then again, nobody's perfect.
In all honesty, her daughter's lack of judgment likely comes from the fact that her mother is a prominent pro-family, abstinence politician. It is similar the the idea of how preacher's kids are usually the first to act out and misbehave. Combine the fact that her oldest child, her son, seems to be doing everything just perfect and a bit of rebellious attitude seems reasonable.

Then the fact that Palin's baby is as almost as old as her daughter is pregnant tells me that with one parent in the hospital and doctor's office there may have been some understandable gaps in parental attentiveness.

I think it'd be a much bigger blow to the Republicans if Palin, who described herself "as pro-life as any candidate can be," had allowed her daughter to abort the baby. That would probably end all hope for the Republicans in the election.
Actually, this plays heavily in her favor. The biggest argument that I hear from pro-lifers after they abandon the women's body line of argument is, "You don't know what it is like to make that choice." That argument has just been muted.

Also, I'm curious as to exactly why McCain chose Palin as his running mate. I'm certain it has a lot to do with her ideals, but I wonder if he chose her because she might bring over those older female Democrats who're unhappy that Hillary didn't win the nomination or get picked as VP. Thoughts?
This is a good question. To answer part of it I have to bring out the giant gorilla in the room that many people have been ignoring, race and sex.

I know plenty of people who were voting for Hillary because they thought it would be awesome to have a female president. They couldn't discuss a single issue, but they knew she was a woman. Equally some people are voting for Obama based on race. Others just want to take part in monumental point in American politics, race or sex either would work.

McCain has just given an option to group 1 and group 3.

He also can now appeal to conservative mothers. I know for the first time ever my mom can look at a politician and associate herself with her completely. My mother is a pro-abstinence, pro-life, career woman. That has never been seen in politics. My mom even admitted that if Hillary weren't pro-choice she would have considered her as a viable option because she could associate with her more, but her abortion stance was too big for her to get past.

And part of it is clearly her principles. While she is new, she has been big on cleaning up corruption, which considering how many complaints toward President Bush there have been regarding how he has gone about things, she gives McCain a quick response to any issues that may come up.

And at the end of the day, we are all talking about her and not Obama's speech.

How can you preach abstinence to the masses when you can't get your own daughter to follow suit?
Are you going to tell me that when you were 17 you didn't do anything your parents didn't approve of? And when you did those things did that make any comment on the subject your parents had invalid?

I have done a number of stupid things, but that does not make my mother a bad parent, nor does it make her opinions any less respectable.

If it worked like that then no parents would be allowed to voice opinions.
 
Isn't Palin's daughter being pregnent a perfect example why we should not follow the abstinence only sex education? Honestly I think if we taught kids about condom and birth control pill use I think you would see a drop in pregnancies that were unwanted. It should also be taught where you can pick up these birth control methods too.

I can tell you right now many Republicans, my parents being two of them, are already wavering support of McCain/Palin because of this. And I quote my dad on this one "So Palin has raise a nice little slut there." My parents are probably the two biggest supports of the Republican party and their values I know and I have a feeling many supporters are going to feel the same way about it. I really don't care, I just think her daughter is stupid because condoms and birth control pills can be had quite easily.

I'm trying to convince my parents that Bob Barr is the way to go now. Even though I don't like some of his policies, all in all he doesn't come across as someone I hate and someone I could live with for 8 years running the country.
 
Are you going to tell me that when you were 17 you didn't do anything your parents didn't approve of? And when you did those things did that make any comment on the subject your parents had invalid?

My parents weren't running for office.

I have done a number of stupid things, but that does not make my mother a bad parent, nor does it make her opinions any less respectable.

If it worked like that then no parents would be allowed to voice opinions.

Politics so much more black & white then real life. Your views on a subject are what people use to judge your stance as a politician. If your views are seen to be at odds to your ability to run your own home, then how can you be expected to 'run the country'?
 
Last edited:
It's not the executive's job to run the country... much less is it the vice president's.
 
Back