Oh, oh, oh, I'm making a Ludicrous Claim®! Read the first post!

[OwensRacing]

Probably digging a hole to Kaz's house to hold him hostage until he writes that letter. Hahaha

Magma!

 

[Bo]

This was humorous. Thank you GTP.

 

[Pupik]

There is a parody loophole so if you called it "Dumb IMSA" it'd be perfectly legal. As its being used for parody.

False. A derivative work is a copyright infringement regardless of how funny or not funny the copy of it may be.

A parody only holds up in some courts if there's no disparaging and slandering use of the copy-written work, and/or there's a completely different re-working of the original such that it couldn't be even mistaken for the original work. Fair Use is when you're re-using it "As Is" to describe/display something in a very limited fashion (usually once or a portion of it).

Of course, it's all about whether the copyright owner cares or chooses to assert and enforce their claim.

 

[R5]

False. A derivative work is a copyright infringement regardless of how funny or not funny the copy of it may be.

A parody only holds up in some courts if there's no disparaging and slandering use of the copy-written work, and/or there's a completely different re-working of the original such that it couldn't be even mistaken for the original work. Fair Use is when you're re-using it "As Is" to describe/display something in a very limited fashion (usually once or a portion of it).

Of course, it's all about whether the copyright owner cares or chooses to assert and enforce their claim.

Well Dumb Starbucks has been lying to me then

 

[Ninners]

I loved viewing this thread in the morning and it's even better in the evening.

Sometimes you a need a claim like this to enjoy your day, especially when it's as hilarious as this.

 

[Monatsende]

And GTP is the ring...

 

[Zuel]

Replace "i" with "u". I take it you went to school.

Yes we've all went to school, so it's simple to interpret.

 

[polarbear345]

Swing and a miss.

 

[Slash]

 

[Ninners]

Yes we've all went to school, so it's simple to interpret.

Why are you quoting your own post?

 

[Slash]

I thought we were done here, but then confused.

 

[Bo]

This thread is making less sense with each page.

 

[Lock2Lock]

@Zuel

So what phone do you have?

 

[Bo]

@Zuel

So what phone do you have?

One that receives special calls from PD and Sony test facilities.

 

[Scaff]

Yes we've all went to school, so it's simple to interpret.

You receive a formal warning about this from two members of staff and then think its a good idea to draw further attention to it?

I'm going to be quite clear about this, should you continue to post in this manner, attempt to 'fob off' the staff and avoid the issue in question then your membership here will not last much longer.

A number of serious questions have quite clearly come to light in regard to claims you have made, of which you have not substantiated a single one.

Either do so with your next post or withdraw the claims and apologise to the members, fail to make your next post one of these two actions and it will result in a temporary ban.

 

[Bo]

Either do so with your next post or withdraw the claims and apologise to the members, fail to make your next post one of these two actions and it will result in a temporary ban.

The third one is "not post again", he might be evaluating that at the minute.

 

[Nish]

Seeing as you've lost family members in the last month @Zuel and others seem to not be worried about it I'd say just stay away from the thread until you get home and cool down. You said you'd share with some people monday or tuesday which is at the least 5 days away. Don't make it 5 days of arguing.

Also you argued with yourself mate .

 

[INEEDNAWZZZ]

Me, reading the past few pages:

 

[Bo]

Seeing as you've lost family members in the last month @Zuel and others seem to not be worried about it I'd say just stay away from the thread until you get home and cool down. You said you'd share with some people monday or tuesday which is at the least 5 days away. Don't make it 5 days of arguing.

👍 This all the way.

Arguing it just makes it worse. You'll dig a hole you'll never get out of.

 

[Slash]

You'll dig a hole you'll never get out of.

He's already beyond that.

 

[Scaff]

Seeing as you've lost family members in the last month @Zuel and others seem to not be worried about it I'd say just stay away from the thread until you get home and cool down. You said you'd share with some people monday or tuesday which is at the least 5 days away. Don't make it 5 days of arguing.

Also you argued with yourself mate .

The next post requirement is not limited to this thread.

Its his next post, period.

 

[Lock2Lock]

@Scaff
It is sad something so simple has lead to that ultimatum. He did it to himself though.

 

[Danny]

 

[Monatsende]

 

[phillgt2002]

He's already beyond that.

Yep. His account may as well be in digital limbo by now.

 

[Bo]

The picture thoroughly upset me.

 

[Terronium-12]

The last time I saw someone quote themselves and talk to themselves was a year or two ago when @Azuremen did it, and I'm pretty sure he was drunk at the time.

 

[R5]

The last time I saw someone quote themselves and talk to themselves was a year or two ago when @Azuremen did it, and I'm pretty sure he was drunk at the time.

Hey I talk to myself a lot and I'm not drunk. I only have one can of beer a day.

Hardly enough to even get a buzz, is it leg'? No it isn't Mach'. See, T-12, even Leg' agrees with me.

 

[Furinkazen]

@carracerptp and

The issue furi is bringing up is when Zuel said I copied him he sent me "the email that they sent him"

Which convienently was full of the same misspellings and grammatical errors that Zuel makes.

Furi just left out the ludicrous part...

Which was that Polar had created this legally infringing logo on Photoshop a day or so before....

 

[polarbear345]

@carracerptp and


Which was that Polar had created this legally infringing logo on Photoshop a day or so before....

Which is funny because I made/edited it myself.