Oh, oh, oh, I'm making a Ludicrous Claim®! Read the first post!

  • Thread starter Der Alta
  • 5,760 comments
  • 489,925 views
Are we still honestly thinking it was all a joke?

@prisonermonkeys just admit you got ahead of yourself in the thread, apologize for acting the way you did, and let's forgot about it and move on. Trying to pass it off as a "joke" isn't really doing for you.

This.

And.

shame you can't put mods on an ignore list because you honestly have nothing worth reading anymore.

He is emeritus, so you can.
 
You really are impossible, shame you can't put mods on an ignore list because you honestly have nothing worth reading anymore.
You actually can put him on ignore, I just looked and it does have the ignore button on his profile.

Edit: Tree'd by Dennisch.
 
200_s.gif
 
You really are impossible, shame you can't put mods on an ignore list because you honestly have nothing worth reading anymore.
If by "you have nothing worth reading anymore", you mean "you won't post what I want to hear", you're probably right. Why should I lie and claim that it wasn't a joke after all simply because someone doesn't want to believe that it was a joke? To avoid being put on someone's ignore list?

I didn't post in that thread so I didn't ignore jack.
I was using "you" in the collective sense.
 
Apologise for what? For making people look like fools?
Who looks like fools again? The people, seemingly dozens of them by the current poll count, who saw you posting a bunch of things that aren't even extreme by the standards of things you usually post and thought you were being sincere when you spent three pages insisting them to be true? Or the single person who spent three pages insisting upon an argument and will no doubt continue to say very similar things in a similar way in the future was all a big joke this time? Because I can tell you, I certainly don't feel like a fool because I saw Interludes posting the things Interludes tends to post but it turns out he was maybe just trolling for three straight pages.


You've just given literally everyone who will have to deal with you in the future a reason to assume you're being facetious whenever you act the same way, even several people who have never even seen you post before; and since you have less self-reflection than Dracula you've still deluded yourself into thinking that you've won something just because you lied until people believed you.
 
anyone who stopped to think for two minutes would have immediately spotted and could have pointed out in the thread and thus reveal it for what it was
I thought long and hard before submitting my lone reply to the thread.
It's not like me to get involved in heated debates but I felt like I needed
to have my say.

Apologise for what? For making people look like fools?
Wait. I partly stood by you in my post and @SVX wholeheartedly stood by you in his post,
and you call us fools for it. I can absorb hurt but I take offence seeing SVX regret his
decision to stand by you and him feeling bad that you mocked his gentlemanly support.

You really should apologise, if not for the supposed joke then at least to him.
Me personally I would loose sleep over hurting someones feelings like that but that's just me,
I do hope that you regret this one part of the whole event though, the part of genuinely hurting
somebody. We all make mistakes but it's owning up to them that makes the difference.


If I really was having a complete and total meltdown that lasted twelve hours, how do you explain my behaviour elsewhere on the forums where there was absolutely no sign of said meltdown? How could I possibly switch that on and off if it wasn't an act?
You assume too much that everyone visit every thread and knows everything that goes on at the gtp forums.
I for one don't, I never saw your other posts during these twelve hours. The only posts of yours that I've ever seen and the only time I've interacted with you have been in the MotoGP thread in the Motorsport section, that's all.
 
You might not like the joke, but that's because the joke was on you.
If you noticed, I didn't partake at all in your silly shenanigans because unlike an individual whose idea of a joke is to have a complete meltdown over a forum Award, but nobody can tell the difference because they find it completely in line with their usual attitude towards people, I spent that time frame out with friends. I had to remove you off the Ignore List just to see what all the random fuss was about after it had ended.

It's no surprise you think you've done something spectacular. Your response to everyone's groaning over this "joke" is the reason they thought you were being serious in the first place.
Apologise for what? For making people look like fools?
The sweet irony is that only person who made a fool of themselves was you.
My question is why the heck is the thread extending to this thread.
My exact concern as well on the last page.

But it appears PM wants everyone to know that he "played" us all for fools and we're all just bitter or something.
 
Last edited:
Apologise for what? For making people look like fools?

Hahaha. I lied to you all and made you look like fools for not realising immediately that I only almost always am as reactionary and irrational as I was in this thread. I can't believe you all didn't spot it.

I am the supreme master of all trolls, and I'm such a troll that I'll refuse to even admit that I'm a troll and then mock you all for not realising that I'm a troll. Even though you all already called me that.

Bow down and worship my awesomeness, because it's all in my own head and I'm entirely oblivious to anything that anyone says to the contrary. Say whatever you like, because all letters look the same to me and they all spell INTERLUDES IS MY MASTER.

Also...

Believe it or not, I can be persuaded to change my mind. It just has to be a particularly compelling argument to do it.

If that was true, you wouldn't be telling an entire thread of people that they don't view you like they think they do, actually they view you as you tell them to. One of the very few things you can't argue with is other people's perceptions. You can think they're lying, but otherwise if they say that they perceive you as exactly the sort of person who would throw a tantrum over being included in a Most Opinionated award you'd have to be colossally obtuse to try and argue with that.
 
Is it not also possible that he does not currently own a Viper nor Lamborghini but hopes to acquire one or the other (or both) in the near future when he cashes the winnings from the lottery ticket he intends to purchase this afternoon?

No, I can't see that as a serious claim to ownership of those cars.
 
Actually I'm hoping to have an opportunity to take my Viper or Lambo out for a spin in the near future too. The odds of that actually happening are pretty remote given that at the moment I have neither the cars nor the means to acquire same, but I'm hoping.

Perhaps we should tag @Driver55 so he can have an opportunity to respond?
 
I suppose it could just be a case of wording and the intention was to imply that if he owned those cars he'd love to take them for a spin.
 
Do you want a lightly used Viper or a Bentley? I'll get you one for around $55-70k. Porsche? $15-25. Do you want to fly a Su-27 or a Mig-29? $20k. If you have a dream and a job, it's not that hard... I can drive anything in this world and have flown some things. Sailed and gone diving. Been on the autobahn plenty. PM me. Just don't be rude.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do you want a lightly used Viper or a Bentley? I'll get you one for around $55-70k. Porsche? $15-25. Do you want to fly a Su-27 or a Mig-29? $20k. If you have a dream and a job, it's not that hard... I can drive anything in this world and have flown some things. Sailed and gone diving. Been on the autobahn plenty. PM me.

K.

How about a flight on a real B-2 Spirit for $50?
 

Latest Posts

Back