Reventón;3246096
I'm really tired of people always bringing this excuse to the table. Ohhh, what does it matter if he's lying or not. Why should we question him?
It matters a lot, and shows the user is trustworthy; that's what we have to gain from asking a simple request. If you believe it's too much to ask for proof, then again, I'll just tell the forum I own a Lamborghini, and thus, you shouldn't have a problem believing me since the mods apparently, have nothing to gain from questioning me.
If you claimed to have a Lamborghini without any proof, I would just ignore you, has simple has put. None of you realized this is just asking for attention. Look at his post, he starts saying that GT5P is not challenging for him, and then out of context, he claims to have a Ford GT
Also, who the hell goes to a Gran Turismo dedicated web site/Forum saying that he doesn’t like or he doesn’t think Gran Turismo is challenging, and then says to own a Ford GT?
Why enforce any of the AUP? Not knowlingly posting fasle information is the first rule.
So, closing the thread, ask the guy for proof and if he provides it, reopen it isn’t ensuring the AUP?
If making a claim
WITHOUT proof is against the AUP, so that thread is against the AUP, so, just close it. The guy that wanted attention doesn’t get that attention he asked for and there is no degration to the site. Also, if he keeps posting about it (again)
WITHOUT any proof at all, close it again and Ban him. Has simple has that. If you don’t have any proof of what you are saying, just don’t post nothing.
Can you imagine it in the Auto forum, someone claims they are a super rich business man from Dubai who has a bigger collection of exotic cars than Jay-Leno? what happens when they start making threads about all the amazing cars they own? start locking the threads? what if they do own them, its unfair to lock their threads if they do genuinely own an impressive car that they want to share with the forum. Or a Mod could tell them back it up, or admit they lied, that way they stop in their tracks, or on the slim chance they are telling the truth, they haven't been treated unfairly either.
It depends if the person in question has or not
proof of what he is saying. If that person says to claim something without
proof, I say, close the thread, ask that person for proof, unable to get some proof, he is a liar. Has simple has put. It is quite doubtable that one person that have such collection of cars, doesn’t have a photo of the cars, nor a photo of him with the car.
Also, for backing up my idea, it is against the AUP, claiming something
WITHOUT proof, so even if you are telling the truth, if you have not any proof at all of what you are saying, you are getting against the AUP. It is not a single bit unfair at all.