One of the most difficult questions...

  • Thread starter AlexGTV
  • 75 comments
  • 2,782 views

Protect your friend or restore justice?

  • I'd keep it a secret

    Votes: 12 14.1%
  • I'd inform the police

    Votes: 66 77.6%
  • I can't decide

    Votes: 7 8.2%

  • Total voters
    85
You sir, deserve cake! đź‘Ť

No thanks, the cake is a lie... aaand I just ate.

On a serious note, if a pedestrian steps out of the darkness and you hit them, i'm pretty sure the authorities will see it as an accident. So long as the road that you were driving on in this remote forest was a public roadway, i'd say that you'd be safe to inform the police.

Either way, it is your legal responsibility to inform the police and paramedics before doing anything else. Running away from a potential crime just makes you seem guilty.
 
Someone that hits a person and keeps driving wouldn't be my friend.
 
I don't talk to pigs.

Me neither, I can't quite get the accent down well enough for them to understand me. Is that your problem too? It just seems like they stare at me wondering what I'm saying so I've given up even trying to talk to them, they're only good for their bacon. :rolleyes:
 
Id deal with it there and then like force my friend to stop the car after the accident. If somehow we agreed to both keep going in the first place when it happened what would be the point of reporting it to the police afterwards as it would still be morally wrong for not stopping when it happened and reporting it afterwards would not make me feel better...

So to answer your question, Id keep it a secret...
 
Ask yourselves, people, ‘what would happen if everyone did that?'

One of the simplest tests to find out if something is moral is to imagine what it would be like if everyone did what you are possibly about to perform, when under similar conditions.
 
I do not have enough courage to honestly inform the inconceivable fact to the police accompanying with the criminal, "I've accidentally run over a lone pedestrian crossing the alley for losing control or awkwardness in driving." is an inexcusable pretext as it's the responsibility of the driver himself, unless the pedestrian intentionally were standing at the sidewalks blocking the way the car is going to get past through.

So I'd rather choose to keep it a secret for temporary excuse from the sin we had just committed. :guilty:
 
I see no point in keeping the situation a secretly, mostly because the detectives and forensic experts will get to the offender sooner or later. All the time in between is just living life in guilt, fear, and shame.

May as well have your friend go to jail early, so they can come out early, and hopefully, still live a decent life.
 
I see no point in keeping the situation a secretly, mostly because the detectives and forensic experts will get to the offender sooner or later. All the time in between is just living life in guilt, fear, and shame.

May as well have your friend go to jail early, so they can come out early, and hopefully, still live a decent life.

This does depend on how the offender plans to do afterwards the accident happened, even though the wrongdoer is to be rounded up by policemen sooner or later. If they wish to have a more discreet life following a long sentence in jail or only seek for a slight moment of repose being himself buried in complete oblivion of infernal lot.
 
I see no point in keeping the situation a secretly, mostly because the detectives and forensic experts will get to the offender sooner or later. All the time in between is just living life in guilt, fear, and shame.

(Bolded mine) This I can confirm; the Toronto Sun featured on its front page a few days ago the Cold Case Squad that had just solved a 17 year old murder case, and went on to document many other long unsolved cases that were eventually cracked.

May as well have your friend go to jail early, so they can come out early, and hopefully, still live a decent life.

This, however, may not be the case in every country. Only in some countries are the rights of both victim and offender protected.

This does depend on how the offender plans to do afterwards the accident happened, even though the wrongdoer is to be rounded up by policemen sooner or later. If they wish to have a more discreet life following a long sentence in jail or only seek for a slight moment of repose being himself buried in complete oblivion of infernal lot.

Yellowbird23 - This is what I understand from what you are saying: Though there exists the eventual possibility of being caught, it is better, till then, to enjoy that momentary and public freedom, oblivious to the impending hell - rather than - going to prison, serving a horrible sentence, and being freed to return to a life of disgrace.

This may hold logic if we're not applying the present legal and ethical world-view - which is governed by physical laws (a.k.a. the five-sensory world.)
You may be looking at it from . . say, Gary Zukav's 'non-judgemental' viewpoint - whereby the victim's death was only a detail in a grand plan that involved non-physical reality - or you are following the philosophies of the Buddha or Helen Schucman, and going with 'the flow'. as is, till 'karma' or destiny, or 'luck' has its way with you (as it did with the victim.)

It doesn't nullify the answer to the question at the core of the professor's query; would you volunteer to confess to the crime - or remain an accessory to the fact? It does state a philosophical (or fatalistic) reason as to why you would remain an assistant to the criminal.

Cheers, :)
Harry.
 
We are turning ourselves in, no question. If I was the driver, I'd never put my friend in a spot like that, nor leave the victim's family with no closure.

It was accidental anyways, not that I would help cover up a murder either. :crazy:
 

Latest Posts

Back