- 10,081
- WFG9
K_Speed, I suggested it to Jame's because his statement implies he may support the policy. "i dont think the americans and others have no right"
Originally posted by K_Speed
Well mate, gotta make somethin clear, I aint german sooo....and you can always make beer stupid its not something that we will run out of, not like OIL
Originally posted by Talentless
M-Spec, it's a simplistic assessment but simple sometimes is what makes the most sense. Most of the world, some to varying degrees, want one thing from us: to be socialists, not communists, socialists. If not in exact economic policy than in moral policy. True, they hate our power, and they'd hate such concentration in any nation. Our sense of being beholden to the community in the way collectivists are is less than it is in their societies. They believe, they must, that we can become them yet still provide the environment from which they can advance in economic and social standing.
With the exception of France, most Americans don't think daily about other countries and how much they resent them. Poll 2000 Americans about Portugal, Senegal, Taiwan, almost all of them, see what they say.
Originally posted by Talentless
Americans will holler at the chance to journey through a disease-infested jungle if it's over 4,000 miles from they're home and is in someplace exotic.
Originally posted by ///M-Spec
Eventually, the various industries will probably go public, once the economy is strong enough to attact investers and individual Iraqis can buy stock. So yes, eventually it will return to the Iraqi people.
M
Originally posted by ///M-Spec
Is it right? I mean, is it okay that some Arabs want to kill random Americans because the US is seen a supporter of Israel?
Why is it unreasonable to expect that someone in the Middle East understands that just because we don't condem Israel's actions doesn't mean we want to kill them all and steal with oil?
M
That is really uncalled for. You've been far more reasonable in the past. I think you should retract that statement, if you want to keep the thread productive. Otherwise you're going to get nothing but a lot of flak from people.
Nobody can have nuke bombs but us.
Acutally, I'm convinced that danoff likes this kind of stuff. Don't you, danoff
an unilateral war decided by the US and the UK?
Originally posted by danoff
That statement contradicts itself.
Originally posted by Talentless
Uni means singular.
Originally posted by GoKents
The bottom line is that I have lost hope, hope for a better world, hope for peace. Hope for a world where leaving people be, will lead to them leaving you be... instead, I live in a world where all that is good and all that is important is destroyed by extremist muslims. I hate them, and if you support anti-american muslims, I hate you.
YOU have been living with hate? Try being the one that's hated, insulted and attacked after the events of 9/11. One extreme group of muslims did something stupid and now the rest of us suffer due to ill-educated hicks who don't know the difference between a muslim and a terrorist.Btw, you can be sure I know how en-raging this post can and will be, and you know what... take it and live with it... since september 11th, I have been living with that hate and dispair to no end.[/B]
Originally posted by jpmontoya
I have many doubts, but I still hope that you are right about this.
Originally posted by jpmontoya
They don't see it as we don't condem their action, but greatly supported them... without us Israel wouldn't exist.
Originally posted by jpmontoya
....but I can't find anything to answer to Muslim anger about us helping a group of people taking over a country on ancestral and religious claims in modern era, and the fact that this issue is still going on today.
Originally posted by jpmontoya
If there was a surge of resentment towards America there after Desert Storm, and that was an international Coalition. what will it be after an unilateral war decided by the US and the UK?
placing the blame solely on palestine just because they've got suicide bombers is also wrong and lazy. Both sides had opportunities to broker peace and both sides decided to do something stupid to prevent it from happening. Peace there isn't likely to happen until someone somehow figures out how intervene and please both groups at the same time.Originally posted by ///M-Spec
I don't think this was a problem. In fact, support for Israel in the first 10 years or so of its existance was a moral and just cause.
I think a Palestinian should be upset about his plight. I would be too. But they should blame their own leadership as well as Israel, which has had several opportunities to broker peace in the last 10 years, but rejected all of Israel's proposals out of hand.
Remember, it takes two to tango. Placing the blame solely on Israel just because they have the guns is wrong and its lazy.
should have said almost unilaterally... my previous post was to put it in a correct way.
Originally posted by emad
care to rephrase that for those of us muslims in this board? I don't support the war at all but I DO live in this part of the world, and I DO like living here.
YOU have been living with hate? Try being the one that's hated, insulted and attacked after the events of 9/11. One extreme group of muslims did something stupid and now the rest of us suffer due to ill-educated hicks who don't know the difference between a muslim and a terrorist.
Anyhoo, this thread is going nowhere - just give it a rest already
Originally posted by danoff
You should also notice how many of my points you're letting go unchallenged.
I'll come back on it later, had enough for today. Or my anger management therapist says so, and won't have much time for it this afternoon.
Originally posted by ///M-Spec
Don't you have a rubber doll to pine over or something?
Why don't you go start a thread about that and leave the thinking stuff for people with a clue? Don't forget your sign.
M [/B]
You are nothing but biased. Another of those crazy yanks.
Originally posted by emad
placing the blame solely on palestine just because they've got suicide bombers is also wrong and lazy.
Originally posted by emad
Both sides had opportunities to broker peace and both sides decided to do something stupid to prevent it from happening. Peace there isn't likely to happen until someone somehow figures out how intervene and please both groups at the same time.
Originally posted by Tercel_driver
I have never heard about that, but coming from you, I guess you know a LOT about it.
Sure, but I dont see them.
Oh, were you talking about yourself?
You are nothing but biased. Another of those crazy yanks.
Originally posted by ///M-Spec
If a Mod is thinking about closing this thread, let me ask that it be moved to Opinons instead... where arguments are more or less expected and is less likely to attract troublemakers.