CFM, don't mean to be too rude, but I'm very confused with what's gone on. Why'd you close the main thread?
Anyway, I think some people suggested that you be a little more aggressive when it comes to promoting and demoting. Thus meaning, when D2ers are worse than something like say, MID D3, they get demoted, and when D3ers post times that are at the top of D2, they'd probably get moved up to D2. Now, of course you look back at older races as well, and see where people've been.
Personally, and I'm very sure I'm not alone here, but if you're going to keep some of us in D3, there are a LOT of people in D3 that are not going to be happy competing with people who should be in D2.
Blah blah, closer competition is possible than what's currently arranged, but you know that.
I'm just a little irked that only ONE person was moved up this week. Looking back through results threads and following along the leaderboards over the weeks I've been here I don't see nor understand how one would get promoted. But that's not up to me anyway.
Just thought I'd point out that the top D3 times are good enough for the bottom of D1, the top D2 times are good for mid D1, the bottom of D2 is good enough for the bottom of D3, and etc... Hell, I was posting T times that were giving the very top of D2(and some D1) runs for their money, T1 of 29.089, T2 of 1.00.6xx, T3 of 1.26.4xx, T4 of 1.48.6xx... And then we have to take into account that people don't get to spend as much time as they'd like some weeks, so that COULD account for why they're at the bottom of their division, but that's not always the case.
It seems as if a fourth division for the people who are less experienced doesn't seem like a bad idea anymore.
This is for another topic, but it needs to be mentioned:
I'm also confused as to why people would want to not post their T times for the week, maybe a podium hungry finish or something? No offense to anyone who would and does do so of course, but why?!
[/rant]
I'd like to hear what some other people say about this.
Kyle, out