Danoff
Premium
- 34,058
- Mile High City
You do realize that xenophobia, nativism & hatred of "the other" has been a constant theme inUShuman history?
FTFY
You do realize that xenophobia, nativism & hatred of "the other" has been a constant theme inUShuman history?
When Libya had their civil war, all the refugees had the sense to go to Egypt or any other surrounding countries, and not traverse a body of water just to escape a war zone.
Genuine refugees are fleeing war, persecution, famine etc. They head to the nearest "safe zone".Had the sense to? Or lacked the resources to do otherwise?
Genuine refugees are fleeing war, persecution, famine etc. They head to the nearest "safe zone".
And how does paying someone thousands of dollars, by some reports, to transport them across a dangerous open body of water jive with lacking resources to do otherwise?I understand why somebody would want to leave a war zone, thanks.
What I'm questioning is Sanji's contention that moving to a nearby country is the only sensible choice.
If I was fleeing an awful situation, and had the means to get as far away as possible, why wouldn't I want to? Why wouldn't that make "sense?"
When Libya had their civil war, all the refugees had the sense to go to Egypt or any other surrounding countries, and not traverse a body of water just to escape a war zone. So what changed between Libya and Syria?
When your choices are either potentially dying at sea or staying in a deteriorating and increasingly-unstable region, risking everything seems worthwhile. The whole "refugees are only refugees until they're safe and then they're economic migrants" argument is a favourite of conservatives with no real grasp of the situation.Where was their sense?
And how does paying someone thousands of dollars, by some reports, to transport them across a dangerous open body of water jive with lacking resources to do otherwise?
You do realize that xenophobia, nativism & hatred of "the other" has been a constant theme in US humanhistory?
Surely then they cross into economic migrant territory. They are no longer looking for a safe zone but, per your admission, looking for better prospects in lifeYou've utterly missed the point.
Sanji was reminiscing about the good ol' days, when refugees had the good "sense" to stay close to home.
I was countering with the notion that the real reason refugees tended to stay close was that they lacked the resources to do otherwise.
That those who do have the resources try and get farther away only bolsters my argument.
Surely then they cross into economic migrant territory. They are no longer looking for a safe zone but, per your admission, looking for better prospects in life
The region has been dominated by perpetual conflict for decades. Refugees might be safe for the short-term, but another conflict will almost certainly engulf the region, and who is safe then? Can you really blame someone for wanting to get as far beyond that as possible, rather than just settling for a small patch of relief that could be swallowed up by the seething morass tomorrow?Surely then they cross into economic migrant territory.
Okay, let me ask you this. Would you agree that as far as land is concerned, that ISIS is pretty well contained today?The region has been dominated by perpetual conflict for decades. Refugees might be safe for the short-term, but another conflict will almost certainly engulf the region, and who is safe then? Can you really blame someone for wanting to get as far beyond that as possible, rather than just settling for a small patch of relief that could be swallowed up by the seething morass tomorrow?
What about those that are already far away but are lining up in a developed first world nation to try get into their preferred first world nation?You've utterly missed the point.
Sanji was reminiscing about the good ol' days, when refugees had the good "sense" to stay close to home.
I was countering with the notion that the real reason refugees tended to stay close was that they lacked the resources to do otherwise.
That those who do have the resources try and get farther away only bolsters my argument.
What about those that are already far away but are lining up in a developed first world nation to try get into their preferred first world nation?
At what point do we realise that some and many are economic Migrants and not refugees.
Sunday bloody Sunday, mate. If liberals care so much about foreign issues put out the cash and don't expect people who could give two squats, about political issues he/she never had an influence on. If liberals care about social issues like welfare, education in the ghettos, social programs like birth control and that other stuff put out that cash. People in today's society have got to take more social responsibility, always expecting others to fix their issues.Why am I not surprised to see a response like that...![]()
Why am I not surprised to see a response like that...![]()
They got all the avengers but the one that matters most; Captain America. These Hillary puppets are just too much. Just remember Nov 8th your vote doesn't matter.
For the most part, yes. But what happens when the pro-government forces or the anti-Assad rebels start to gain a foothold in the region? Towns and cities that free of the threat posed by ISIS will be confronted by a new threat.Okay, let me ask you this. Would you agree that as far as land is concerned, that ISIS is pretty well contained today?
Do you plan on contributing anything to this conversation, or are you just going to keep treating everyone like an idiot?Just remember Nov 8th your vote doesn't matter.
Not if you bought Occulus Rift.Thought we were keeping this thread meme free?
I will take that as "no, I don't intend on contributing anything to the discussion because I think you're all idiots seeing as how you don't think like me".Don't be a 'prisoner' of the moment.
I guess I'm buying an HTC Vive, then.
Subway made Jared Fogle famous and rich.
Jared Fogle used that money and fame to diddle kids.
If you eat at Subway, you are pro-child molestation.