[POLL] United States Presidential Elections 2016

The party nominees are named. Now who do you support?


  • Total voters
    278
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
This election is hilarious.

Hillary is like your stereotypical political person. Looks good on the front but shady at the back. She'll getting elected not because of her own quality, but more because she's basically the lesser of two evils aka atleast Trump isnt going to reign.

Where's Gary Johnson?
 
This election is hilarious.

Hillary is like your stereotypical political person. Looks good on the front but shady at the back. She'll getting elected not because of her own quality, but more because she's basically the lesser of two evils aka atleast Trump isnt going to reign.

Where's Gary Johnson?
Hilary look's bad everywhere maybe if it was 20 years ago then yes. Hilary is basically expired Vegemite and Trump well his hairline is just in violation of travelling the way I see it. Where's Monica when you need her.
 
And which front would that be?
Her campaign obviously. You know, typical politicians around the world. Not necessarily a desirable leader.

In the same place as all the other 3rd party candidates.

Ignoriaville.
Better than from Paranoia-ville and Generic Politician Factory.

I still dont know him but to think that a person who doesn't eat too much publicity is likely a good leader, atleast from my perspective.
 
The First Presidential Debate is next week. I did a little straw poll to get GTP's take on who would win the debate. I will edit the link out of this post at Noon US Central time next Monday and will notify you the results in the OP.

http://www.strawpoll.me/11261465
 
Apologies in advance for the double post, but I am catching up with the news cycle.

More from Weekend at Hillary's:

hillary-stairs-temple-575x402.jpg

Source: Getty Images

Hillary needed more help getting up the stairs at a rally in Philadelphia this past Monday afternoon.

New Endorsement: OP Update

The Fraternal Order of Police has endorsed Donald Trump for President, The Hill reports. Trump received a two-thirds majority from the group's National Board. Here is the endorsement letter:

police-endorse-donald-trump-768x994.jpg

Source: YoungCons

As a follow up to the endorsement, Trump shook the hands of his police escort as he was leaving Michigan today.
 
DK

Not sure what the point of the Harry Reid video was, just for him to spout where his party lines are set up. I mean if the U.S. is Trumps next charity then what is it if Hillary wins, a pay to play scheme for international wealth? Cause if that's the case yet again, neither should be the viable option...

I mean at this point many of these news posts that bring "dirt" aren't doing anything new or surprising. It's all a bit obvious at this point. I feel the only importance now is the debates and who will win and how come November. Unless Donald shoots someone on a New York street or Hillary has a seizure on stage, then I may be somewhat surprised by that news.
 
I'm with her is code for I need medical assistance. Now if you excuses me a gallon or two so should wash these communist away.

hillary_obama__48537.1414194831.600.600.jpg
 
Communists? No. Socialists? Not really. Liberal democrats? Yes for Obama. Establishment hack? Hell yes for Clinton.
Doesn't matter socialist, communist, liberal all the same all getting triggered, what we needed was a revolution. George Soros another crook along with the Rothschilds and Royal family probably already determined the election. Bernie Sanders is another tool for the Clinton's.

Obama is an Establishment Hack, Clinton is a Corporate Prostitute.
Bill should share his interns, that's a good free trade agreement.
 
Doesn't matter socialist, communist, liberal all the same
Actually, it does matter, because they're completely different things.

Tell me, would you prefer a centralised system of banking with at least one publicly-owned bank so that every person earning the minimum wage could take out an affordable home loan? Or would you prefer a completely decentralised system of privately-owned banks that were free to charge whatever interest rate they liked?

Think carefully on your answer.

George Soros another crook along with the Rothschilds and Royal family probably already determined the election.
I'm not sure whether it was your naming Soros, the Rothschilds or the Royal family that did it, but at some point in that sentence, you crossed over into crazyville.
 
Actually, it does matter, because they're completely different things.

Tell me, would you prefer a centralised system of banking with at least one publicly-owned bank so that every person earning the minimum wage could take out an affordable home loan? Or would you prefer a completely decentralised system of privately-owned banks that were free to charge whatever interest rate they liked?

Think carefully on your answer.
If you're anywhere close to minimum wage you can't afford a home purchase so A isn't an option for me.
 
Jesus Christ, the obsession conservatives/Repubs still have with this is just baffling to me.
That reminds me, Newt Gingrich (probably Bill Clinton's nemesis at the time of the Lewinsky scandal) dumped his first wife while she was fighting cancer for his mistress, and then cheated on his second wife with his eventual third wife.

And of course, there's Trump's own record of adultery, such as cheating on his first wife Ivana with Marla Maples, and then cheating on her with Melania. :rolleyes:
 
DK
That reminds me, Newt Gingrich (probably Bill Clinton's nemesis at the time of the Lewinsky scandal) dumped his first wife while she was fighting cancer for his mistress, and then cheated on his second wife with his eventual third wife.

And of course, there's Trump's own record of adultery, such as cheating on his first wife Ivana with Marla Maples, and then cheating on her with Melania. :rolleyes:
I guess that justifies Clinton's record of unfaithfulness completely then. Glad we cleared that up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back