[POLL] United States Presidential Elections 2016

The party nominees are named. Now who do you support?


  • Total voters
    278
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
camacho.jpg


I'd post the video from the House of Representin', but it has profanities.
 
Jesse Ventura on Trump and Hillary

The video is the same, with different start points.

Jesse Ventura on Trump



Jesse Ventura on Bernie and Clinton



edit: I just wanted to add Jesse's prediction.

 
Last edited:
Gotta agree on his philosophy of the middle east, when the Europeans started drawing borders over the middle east, they really didn't look at the demographics and alot of the problems today still stem from that.
 
This election drama is why Multiparty (more than 2 or 3) system rocks.
Technically we do, there are 4 people running. The other 2 statistically don't have a chance. Or rarely in the news. All I know about them is, Jill, spray painted something during a protest and Gary likes weed and doesn't know a city that is rarely talked about it main media...
 
Last edited:
It's truly baffling how badly the Democrats have botched this campaign. The Republicans put up Donald Trump, the guy's been a snake oil salesman and walking punchline for decades. Trump framed the election around working class poverty wrought by the loss of manufacturing and elite career politicians serving the financial industry over ordinary people, and the Democrats respond with a candidate who is the concentrated essence of a career politician out of touch with ordinary people. She's mired in scandal after scandal because they insist on keeping everything a secret all the time and runs everything through her own personal foundation. They either don't care or don't get that average people don't consider Saudi Arabia a close and valued ally of the west or a regime worth pandering to, and they honestly think that fabricating "Trump is a secret double agent for communist Russia" conspiracies is a winning strategy.

Also, it's funny to me that Gary Johnson and Jill Stein are presented as these total cranks, but we're supposed to sit here and be content with Trump wanting to bomb the 🤬 out of "them" and stoking the fires of ethnic nationalism, or Clinton's legacy of supporting permanent war and American meddling in Iraq, Libya, and Syria, and her millions of foundation contributions from repressive Gulf monarchies. Somehow I feel like those things are more objectionable than someone not knowing what Aleppo is or having some kooky ideas about wi-fi or spray painting a bulldozer.





These two tweets (#4 and #13) encapsulate the problem to me. They attack Trump for saying he'd work with a terrorist and dictator like Gaddafi and then smear him for (his son) criticizing "crucial allies" like Saudi Arabia. How can you possibly reconcile that?
 
Last edited:
It's truly baffling how badly the Democrats have botched this campaign. The ReEsppublicans put up Donald Trump

Nothing baffling. The Republicans didn't "put up" Trump. He thrashed the strongest GOP field in 100 years. Because this election is about nothing but the voters themselves. The great bulk of Trump supporters couldn't care less what he does as president, as long as they get good jobs, secure borders, and sound money in the bank. Realize this election isn't about anything but the voters themselves. It's a prairie fire, a grassroots, populist rebellion against the failures of the elite establishment to protect the most vital national interests.
 
More from the Guccifer leaks. A Democratic senator recently had an email exchange with a top Democrat donor, who then relayed the news to former Secretary of State Colin Powell over the state of Hillary's health. I'll post the exchange here between the donor and Powell below:

Screen-Shot-2016-09-14-at-9.48.38-AM-1024x239.png


This was in reference to this picture, which Hillary needed help climbing the stairs to a donor's house for a fundraiser. Hillary claimed at the time that she tripped over her own two feet.

hillary-tripping-630x399.jpg


Not surprisingly, the new narrative that Hillary is working herself to death while pushing the gender inequality line is now circulating through the MSM.

CNN's Christiane Amanpour
Can’t a girl have a sick day or two? Don’t get me started, because when it comes to overqualified women having to try 100 times harder than under-qualified men to get a break, well, we know that story.


Source: Brietbart
 
I don't usually subscribe to conspiracy theories, but what Huma Abedin just sent the day after Benghazi is absolutely disgusting:

Screen-Shot-2016-09-14-at-10.48.23-AM.png

Source: Weasel Zippers

Regardless of the context of the email, what we do know is that her boss, Hillary Clinton, is facing a possibly disabling disease that should put her out of office, and when this disease wins, who is willing to control the Presidency? Tim Kane? He should as he would be the Vice President, but a more likely candidate is someone who has more direct access to Hillary herself. That someone is Huma Abedin.
 
GTPLANET prepare youself for the what in the
h**k did I just watch.


Did you seriously just censor yourself with the work heck...I mean you could say hell if you wanted.
I don't usually subscribe to conspiracy theories, but what Huma Abedin just sent the day after Benghazi is absolutely disgusting:

Screen-Shot-2016-09-14-at-10.48.23-AM.png

Source: Weasel Zippers

Regardless of the context of the email, what we do know is that her boss, Hillary Clinton, is facing a possibly disabling disease that should put her out of office, and when this disease wins, who is willing to control the Presidency? Tim Kane? He should as he would be the Vice President, but a more likely candidate is someone who has more direct access to Hillary herself. That someone is Huma Abedin.
I mean we knew about this, so yeah it's disgusting then and now. However, my biggest issue with this is how the hell would the former Weiner get presidency? Also can we just take a moment and realize how deserving she is of her former husband. I mean she is just as corrupt as he was, problem is only if the evidence is too good to get out of then that's different.
 
I mean we knew about this, so yeah it's disgusting then and now. However, my biggest issue with this is how the hell would the former Weiner get presidency? Also can we just take a moment and realize how deserving she is of her former husband. I mean she is just as corrupt as he was, problem is only if the evidence is too good to get out of then that's different.
I would say the same way Mrs. Wilson was able to act on Woodrow Wilson's behalf during the later years of his presidency when he had a stroke, limiting access to the President to just two people, the puppet master, and the doctor, and acting as the proxy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back