PRAIANO'S TUNES : SETTINGS FOR GT7

  • Thread starter praiano63
  • 13,069 comments
  • 14,442,837 views
Tokyo Rain

after 1.20 for me is now impossible to win with Nissan Gt-R 17 by Praiano
before was easy with pit only for fuel
now front tires degrade and all is more difficult
I don’t know if this is more near to reality but now Tokyo rain is not a way to make money.
bah
Now after 1.20 , you can drive with the same performance with a 75 / 80% wear or more. Changing tires add only 5 sc during the pit , if wear represent a lost of time , no reason to avoid .
maestro, will you do some setup for the ford gt40 and / or Senna's iconic mclaren?
Hello , McLaren 8.000.000 i'll buy for sure. The old GT40 is not a priority . Others like

Shelby Cobra Daytona Coupe '64 ,

McLaren McLaren F1 '94

Porsche 917K '70

McLaren McLaren MP4/4 '88
... Are , having good feedback.
 
Anyone have any suggestions in cars for the new rally races at Barcelona? They’re tough. Especially, because I don’t know that course and keep hitting barriers.

Pro tip, turn on the setting that shows you in red where to brake. It helps you see where to go on that complicated course. Before that, I felt like I was getting lost on an auto cross course I’d never walked.
 
Last edited:
@praiano63 or anyone who knows. Does raising height actually improve tge actual performance/handling as alluded to recently on the forum by some, or does it tend to make car handle a bit worse but gives you a lot of pp points to use elsewhere more effectively?
 
B80
Sorry i don't understand "tge".
But it's a fact that higher ride height , on road cars before 1.20 , reduce sudden chassis move and wheel spin out corner.
Downforce proportionally to the amount , reduce this behavior. I didn't test deeply but it's possible that 1.20 reduce this behaviors tighting those chassis reactions.
For the question about RH increase reduce grip and lowering PP is still the same. Just need to find the sweet spot for a given track , needing more or less grip .
 
Sorry i don't understand "tge".
But it's a fact that higher ride height , on road cars before 1.20 , reduce sudden chassis move and wheel spin out corner.
Downforce proportionally to the amount , reduce this behavior. I didn't test deeply but it's possible that 1.20 reduce this behaviors tighting those chassis reactions.
For the question about RH increase reduce grip and lowering PP is still the same. Just need to find the sweet spot for a given track , needing more or less grip .

Cheers boss. Sorry was mistype on phone: tge = the.

Hopefully you enjoying the game more again with this update..
 
Anyone have any suggestions in cars for the new rally races at Barcelona? They’re tough. Especially, because I don’t know that course and keep hitting barriers.

Pro tip, turn on the setting that shows you in red where to brake. It helps you see where to go on that complicated course. Before that, I felt like I was getting lost on an auto cross course I’d never walked.
The 600pp one is fairly easy to beat, my two Jay Zee Yaris GR made it easy. I’m experimenting with different cars for the other one. It’s hard. I haven’t done better than 3rd place so far.
 
Last edited:
B80
@praiano63 or anyone who knows. Does raising height actually improve tge actual performance/handling as alluded to recently on the forum by some, or does it tend to make car handle a bit worse but gives you a lot of pp points to use elsewhere more effectively?
As an old Motocross racer, raising the ride height on a car will give you more travel, and more travel means less traction robbing pitching and air time. So, it will smooth out the ride and give you more grip! I bought one of those Peugeot cars like your opponent and raised the ride height, increased the traction, and won easily. No more long flights off the jumps, the increase in travel looks after a lot.
 
As agreed, here is the super formula settings sheet, based on the one you made on GT sport and which is perfect for gr1 events on St Croix and also works on Suzuka 👍
Dunno why this car can’t get any faster. It has the horsepower to do so.
 
Trying to set the Cayman GT4 on tokyo rain , but the car work faster without parts like , gearbox , suspension , ... any part that add PP on it , slow the car a lot on this track at 600PP. It's still performant with NO tune at Tokyo, i'm going to set the car on Nordschleife instead , and check if the 700PP is reachable at Le Mans... later.
 
Trying to set the Cayman GT4 on tokyo rain , but the car work faster without parts like , gearbox , suspension , ... any part that add PP on it , slow the car a lot on this track at 600PP. It's still performant with NO tune at Tokyo, i'm going to set the car on Nordschleife instead , and check if the 700PP is reachable at Le Mans... later.

Trying to set the Cayman GT4 on tokyo rain , but the car work faster without parts like , gearbox , suspension , ... any part that add PP on it , slow the car a lot on this track at 600PP. It's still performant with NO tune at Tokyo, i'm going to set the car on Nordschleife instead , and check if the 700PP is reachable at Le Mans... later.
I noticed that too ...it's like the car is already to go but I did reduce the weight and bore it up, crank, camshaft, polish ports and engine balance tuning also stock up and rigidity
 
This is my attempt but I'm sure the maestro will have something better
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20220827_222040563.jpg
    PXL_20220827_222040563.jpg
    194.8 KB · Views: 70
De Tomaso Mangusta '69 - 550 PP - Neumáticos duros deportivos - All around
¡Este coche no se podía conducir! Se supone que es el "asesino de cobras de Shelby", por eso la mangusta.
No es un error en absoluto. El problema era la distribución del peso. ¿Un loco 32% delantero 68% trasero? Sí, es posible (o no estoy seguro). Así que aumenté 200 kg de lastre para dar un 43 % en la parte delantera y un 57 % en la parte trasera, que es una distribución común en los autos MR.
Ahora es una verdadera bestia en cualquier lugar. Todavía es un punto a tener cuidado, en una curva cerrada al acelerar, puede salir mal.


EDITAR: Algunos especialistas dicen 44% frente al 56%. Entonces, es posible que PD use datos incorrectos sobre el automóvil. 32% frente al 68% es una locura total.
"Guide des sportives" sobre Mangusta

NO cuerpo ancho
Llantas 17" / Ancho de llanta Ancho / Desplazamiento ancho
Parte delantera A
Alerón trasero: Personalizado.
.


Funciona de maravilla gracias
 
Is it possible a tune for Nissan GTR Gr4?
Maestro must be very busy for setting up more complicated car tune.
For the time being, please be patient by using the setting below.
 
Maestro must be very busy for setting up more complicated car tune.
For the time being, please be patient by using the setting below.
Is it for a specific event ? Track ? Tires ? PP ?
 
Porsche Cayman GT4 '16 - 700PP - Racing Hard Tires - Nordschleife / Le Mans


Wide car
Rims size up to you
Width wide


Front A - Side A - Rear A - Wing custom

This car is 6:35 on Nordschleife in my hands , on Le Mans 3 laps FM 4 pushing and 4 laps FM 5 . My only try was with dry weather. Must be excelent on wet conditions , the car is perfectly stable anyway.
Not so good at 600PP , 700PP is his best range for sure.

View attachment 1187546View attachment 1187547View attachment 1187548View attachment 1187549View attachment 1187550View attachment 1187551



>((((°>°°°°°°

Enjoy your drive.
That's an incredible tune - revived races that I had lost interest in like Schwarzwald at St Croix... time to explore some other forgotten races!
 
Pontiac GTO The Judge 1969. Problems with the very high torque. At 600PP sport tires or 700PP racing hard , the extreme torque is impossible to manage , producing very weird reactions under acceleration. I've tested a lot of LSD settings , even Traction control can't give any solution.
It's possible to drive the car with an open differential , (stock) 0/0/0 , but the car feel even more weird , like an infinite marschmallow drive.
The only option is to detune it at 500PP where the car drive perfectly and very performant. Faster as my MR2 on Suzuka.
Coming soon.
 
Pontiac GTO The Judge 1969. again. So it's a wonderfull car after some tweaks , it's a very good 500PP but you have to go down the power for this. So i did the same settings for original power . It's drive like a dream on the Nordschleife and end at 550PP . Soon
 
Ok , this is your opinion . Last week the GTR was a dominant car for the last time attack with BOP settings ..... Let's see what @Fluffy_Pork is asking for.
Maestro @praiano63 , thank you very much for your kind check of my request. I previously had insisted on setting MP4/4 below 900PP as I first thought it was enough power. But please disregard my awkward request on limiting PP and please make setting as you feel the car runs comfortable and at the same time performant, especially in Suzuka Circuit. I always appreciate your work. Regards from Tokyo. Fluffy.
 
Maestro @praiano63 , thank you very much for your kind check of my request. I previously had insisted on setting MP4/4 below 900PP as I first thought it was enough power. But please disregard my awkward request on limiting PP and please make setting as you feel the car runs comfortable and at the same time performant, especially in Suzuka Circuit. I always appreciate your work. Regards from Tokyo. Fluffy.
You were talking about the GTR GR4 i think , not enough credit yet for the MP4.
 
Last edited:
Oh! I truly apologize for making you confused. I am very sorry. Fluffy
No cofused at all ;) just because you post this under your request . But it's ok , so i'll do a 630 to 650PP tune soon for the GTR GR4
 
Back