- 1,913
- valencia
- Donnced
The 650 GT3 is my 'go to' car in ACC, I utterly love the thing.
I'm doing the career with the 650S and do some hotlaps o short races with the 720S ,two great cars for sure,love how different each car is that SIM.
Going back to Pcars...I loved the 2 first Pcars, even with their flaws and bugs..but pshift3 don't convince me..and after Pcars 2 I can't believe anymore in their "marketing talks" ...I just remember every time how Ian came here on GTPLANET "promoting" Pcars 2... with the best FFB on the market, the "nailed" controller behaviour , etc,etc
Sure will follow the progress of information and after launch follow reviews and sensations of the users.
But I think I will stick with Pcars 2,where at least we enjoy proper online racing leagues and events simulating a full racing weekend.
@MagpieRacer like I said to Scaff, I just don't believe any word anymore from their "marketing talks" ...just go to the old Pcars 2 threads and look to the "marketing talks" and what was the real thing.
No tyre wear,and always on optimal performance.. affects phisycs, cause it's part of it, no fuel consumption, makes difference in weight,car balance and behaviour ,so affects phisycs.
Dummed down damage, affects phisycs.
Upgrading a car, yes...you can ask me what make it arcady..ok.
You can sell me that the upgrades are in a "realistic" way.
But did they take all cars, upgrade it to see how the behaviour is with each different configuration possible ? Sure not, and that affects phisycs...it's already really difficult with the technical cad and trying the car on track to properly simulate that specific car..
If you add so much variations on it...makes it practically impossible to get it "realistic" simulated, so it's it's "more arcady" in my point of view.
Last edited: