- 87
- United Kingdom
The game needs a nice chunky demo to let people decide for themselves. I like it, I took a risk buying it blind, I would not call it a sim but I do think it is a really fun racing game.
The game needs a nice chunky demo to let people decide for themselves. I like it, I took a risk buying it blind, I would not call it a sim but I do think it is a really fun racing game.
You know what's the best about all of these?
Its the fact that the main conflict is not about SMS / PCars franchise to another company like Kunos and PD / franchise like ACC and GT.
Its about SMS / PCars franchise of today to SMS / PCars franchise of the past, and that really amuses me.
You serious? If there's one thing that is bad in this game are graphics. The game look awful.The game does look good.
Yeah. I made the same point in the General Discussion. Their 3-year-old sequel has more current players than a game released in the last few days. Definitely wouldn't have been the case from 1-2.Concurrent player numbers when I checked on Steam speak for themselves
View attachment 953314 View attachment 953315
Steam skews more to hardcore, we see that with the hardware usage stats for DiRT Rally 2.0 where wheel usage is much higher than on console.Yeah. I made the same point in the General Discussion. Their 3-year-old sequel has more current players than a game released in the last few days. Definitely wouldn't have been the case from 1-2.
Yeah. We can only compare to what it was since we don't have console numbers to properly compare. Though using the same metric, PCARS2 has more.No console numbers of course but FWIW on amazon.uk its #14 on xbox and #19 on PS4.
@Titzon Toast I had a lot of fun with this game in my first two hour session with it and was surprised myself because I found the handling to be pretty darn authentic having used three different cars with three different feels
I think you're getting the reaction only because your words were a little bit strong and even though you probably didn't intend to do it, it kind of gave the impression that you were telling other people off.
I would be interested in hearing more specific things from you as to what you like because for me, at least early on, it is the handling.
My struggle is with the hyper aggressive AI but I'm only playing on the medium level and maybe they are better on a higher level.
I was just very annoyed with a lot of the abuse that was directed at SMS over the changes they'd made, especially from folk who hadn't even played the game yet.
I was fairly inebriated to say the least when I posted that.
I love the handling, the ffb really communicates what the car is doing in the wet and dry. I'm very impressed so far.
The graphics and frame rate need some serious work though, they're far from perfect.
I do have all the best SIM racing games and enjoy them also.
This one puzzles me because I've heard many people agree with you but I don't find the graphics to be that bad. It might be because I've never really cared too much for graphics. I might be the only person who's not put off by them.
I am so focused on the race; I’ve yet to notice the disturbing mobile/PS1/PS2 level graphics people have been writing about. On a positive not this game can really elevate itself with a thoughtful optimization patch.
For VR and custom events you could try PC2 as the graphics, performance and FFB in PC2 is really a lot better.Being on a PC and STEAM, All I can say about the game so far is it works well with my Thrustmaster TMX wheel and my Oculus Rift S so far. ... ...
This game because of having VR, will spend now more time with PC3 than my older older GRID games. I will mostly
do custom events so I can do all the cars and tracks, which is what I do in other racing games.
For VR and custom events you could try PC2 as the graphics, performance and FFB in PC2 is really a lot better.
After doing in VR a 2 lap career race in rain with the Lancer and thinking about this nonsense to go from last to first in 2 laps while rammed from the AI (difficulty on legendary) I tried a 6 lap race in PC2. Performance in PC3 is so bad 45 fps reprojection with some 75 fps after all AI was overtaken and out of sight.
So I did a 6 lap race in PC2 to do a 1:1 comparison. I used also the Lancer and weather progression from rain to cloudy. PC2 looks way better, the car feels way better even the AI is better. Performance is way better 90 fps with some dips down to 80 fps.
PC3 looks awful with this white lines around the cars, the constant ramming by AI and the blurry picture sum it up. I really hope SMS will not abandon this game and work on it like the Driveclub crew.
What is so disappointing is when I view a couple of my saved replays in PC3 with VR I did and one view is like looking from high in the stands and below I see the beautiful view of the pit area of the Dubai track, But we cant use it
The constant bullying by the AI is the one thing that frustrates me. I thought it might be related to the level Im playing on because I'm not playing on a high level. I'm only playing on the medium level.the constant ramming by AI
I haven't heard if changing the settings would make the AI less "bastard-ish". Yes, I made that word up but I think they deserve it
This is a FAIR review.
Most of us in here wanted a sim and that’s what we expected. I’m curious how the teenage boys feel about this game, because I think this is geared perfectly towards them.
haven't had AI target me unless I really rammed them off a couple of times.
This is a FAIR review.
Most of us in here wanted a sim and that’s what we expected.
Playing the victim role mightn't be a good idea after the stealthy, confusing, and often dismissive tone of some towards many who weren't those precisely what the video is about. You know you cannot make a video about those very few mother****ing ones issuing death threats on to devs because most of us are not like that.