Sage Ages
(Banned)
- 12,817
- Antarctica
Did they really do that...? Really?! 🤬 backstreet jobs ruining Lancers...
It's supposed to be an awd 900hp 10,000rpm Eclipse. Only made about 380..... for only a few minutes.
Did they really do that...? Really?! 🤬 backstreet jobs ruining Lancers...
I saw a Prelude that had a clean bodykit, but it looked a bit like an R33. It had those chrome tailights though.![]()
RandomCarGuy17Let me guess, the car due to the engine produces 500hp with 540ft.lbs of torque, goes from 0-60 in 2.6 secends since it's apparently lightweight, and has a top speed of 235mph. All while being able to do 40mpg thanks to ecoboost.![]()
As stupid as that looks, it makes sense (FWD, front wheel downforce), so function over form = great in my book.
Last night at the drag strip. Yes the lights flashed on and off.
CallmeDanI know the whole "function over form" term... BUT THIS CAR JUST LOOKS FREAKING STUPID!
Not sure if this has been posted before, which it probably has, but it still looks idiotic.
carracerptpAs stupid as that looks, it makes sense (FWD, front wheel downforce), so function over form = great in my book.
legacyMACHINEThere is a point where it gets... Questionable...
To say the least
SlashfanLast night at the drag strip. Yes the lights flashed on and off.
There is a point where it gets... Questionable...
To say the least
I know but any time attack/track/racing cars can never have properly 'questionable' modifications because they serve a true purpose of making the car go quickly. And also it just looks too cool to question IMO:tup:I know the whole "function over form" term... BUT THIS CAR JUST LOOKS FREAKING STUPID!
I know the whole "function over form" term... BUT THIS CAR JUST LOOKS FREAKING STUPID!
Not sure if this has been posted before, which it probably has, but it still looks idiotic.
![]()
![]()
![]()
It's questionable, though. Like a turbo for a 458, it'll split opinion.
I like that its functional, but it still looks (in my opinion) strange.
And hard to see past.
Eh, this thread will split opinion a lot, I could argue for England, but I'm too busy laughing at this
And I can't stop! A Stanced GT3...
No. No. No. No. No. Why?
*facepalm* Now that is going too far. You don't stance supercars!
Strange isn't questionable, though. Old Can Am race car aerodynamics look strange as can be just like the Tyrrell P34's 6 wheels, but if they're serving a purpose & increasing performance, I fail to see how its questionable when it's working.It's questionable, though. Like a turbo for a 458, it'll split opinion.
I like that its functional, but it still looks (in my opinion) strange.
And hard to see past.
The RUF BTR and RWB Porsches do have a very wide stance, namely the rear wheels, but atleast Nakai-san doesn't make the car hellaflush or disgusting.
In the case of those cars, it is questionable. Even the rear spoiler wasn't originally placed there by Lamborghini.Also, I have seen many countachs with front spoilers.