[RACE] International Touring Car Championship - #5 - Close this vthreadOpen 

  • Thread starter ITCC_Andrew
  • 2,843 comments
  • 91,354 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Low 52s in the clio, so bmw is faster on hards than we are on meds. Mini was about half a sec quicker at motegi so about .2/3 sec quicker here seems to verify the performance difference.
 
Not just that... I have fancy equipment called a "brain," which was trained as an automotive service technician. I know what to look for.

So now you are saying that you are validating cars by simply watching them on track and looking for suspicious things instead of using PP figures?
 
So now you are saying that you are validating cars by simply watching them on track and looking for suspicious things instead of using PP figures?

PP does differ by 1pp either way of ballast. So technically it should xxHp @ xxPP with parts installed and xxPP difference due to ballast position.
 
Low 52s in the clio, so bmw is faster on hards than we are on meds. Mini was about half a sec quicker at motegi so about .2/3 sec quicker here seems to verify the performance difference.
Yet, when I drive Clio, it's faster...? :indiff: that's a seriously bad setup you've got, I believe. I know you're a good driver... Would you like some help?

So now you are saying that you are validating cars by simply watching them on track and looking for suspicious things instead of using PP figures?
Nope. I look for outliers, but even PP can be faked. The only true way is to check the data..
 
Yet, when I drive Clio, it's faster...? :indiff: that's a seriously bad setup you've got, I believe. I know you're a good driver... Would you like some help?


Nope. I look for outliers, but even PP can be faked. The only true way is to check the data..

Maurice, stop making things up.
 
Just wanted to say that 53.5 is the time to beat on RH tires while talking to your mom on the phone and driving with one hand
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back