The 'XR' trademark is common down under. Our Falcon has the XR6, XR6 Turbo, XR8 (recently dropped). Then what Europe would call an ST Focus, we call it an XR5 Turbo and the ST Fiesta is known as the XR4.The Ford (oh no he didn't) Sierra was build with a 302 V8 engine, in South Africa, and was called the XR8.
Firstly, I'm just going off what was said on Mega Factories cause I posted this whilst I was watching the epsiode where they talked about the Bugatti Veyron and the narrator stated that the tyres were over engineered.That's not over-engineered at all. All engineering is done with a safety margin. If everything is engineered to just the limit, then as soon as the limit is crossed ever so slightly, the product will fail. You wouldn't want to just touch 253.1mph and have the tires suddenly explode, would you?
In this case, a 10% testing safety margin, albeit on top of designed existing factor of safety, is hardly anything at all.
The 'XR' trademark is common down under. Our Falcon has the XR6, XR6 Turbo, XR8 (recently dropped). Then what Europe would call an ST Focus, we call it an XR5 Turbo and the ST Fiesta is known as the XR4.
Which is what Australia is still in, is it not?But that was in the 80's and early 90's.
Which is what Australia is still in, is it not?
None of these cars have Ford V8s anymore. Only the CC8S & CCR had Ford V8s. The CCX & onwards use a Koenigsegg-developed V8 now to run a higher octane fuel for the power & to make the car legal for US buyers.
Firstly, I'm just going off what was said on Mega Factories cause I posted this whilst I was watching the epsiode where they talked about the Bugatti Veyron and the narrator stated that the tyres were over engineered.
Thirdly, 25 and a bit mph is a consiederable margin.
Fair enough for your case but if these are the same tyres used on the Veyron SS; as well all know can achieve 267mph, it would still be deemed safe enough at those speeds and you could consider it to be over engineered, but delibreately.
Sure as hell looks like a Modular to me
Note the location of the Cam cover bolts and shape of the Cam cover. I love those CF cam covers they are nice looking.
Perhaps that's a coincidence? I'm more inclined to believe Koenigsegg than mere speculation.
I assume you mean 4.6%. A jeep, Hummer or Unimog could not drive up a 46% grade. Godd info though.
You being the only one responding to my posts with your conjecture sounding response makes me think you're Shledon from Big Bang Theory. But with all that aside could you just acknowledge that the tyre of a Veyron was tested at 279mph over the 253mph top speed like everybody else and move on?Cool story. That show then is at best, misleading, and at worst, wrong.
Absolute numbers don't mean much without context. "25 and a bit mph" may be significant if it was only designed to go 25mph, but at the other extreme, 25mph is a negligible difference for a Atlas V rocket reaching 35,800 mph. In this case, 25mph remains a fairly small fraction of the overall top speed that the Veyron is designed to achieve.
Assuming those tires do fail beyond 279mph (hence why they were only tested up to that speed), I certainly hope they don't use the same tires for the Veyron SS. Only a 5% margin of safety? That's incredibly risky and irresponsible.
Perhaps that's a coincidence? I'm more inclined to believe Koenigsegg than mere speculation.
They probably just took the design & changed the intervals of it for reasons I already listed. But, the fact is their engines are built in house instead of from Ford.Sure as hell looks like a Modular to me
Note the location of the Cam cover bolts and shape of the Cam cover. I love those CF cam covers they are nice looking.
You being the only one responding to my posts with your conjecture sounding response makes me think you're Shledon from Big Bang Theory. But with all that aside could you just acknowledge that the tyre of a Veyron was tested at 279mph over the 253mph top speed like everybody else and move on?
Seriously Crash stop, just stop. This is just going to keep going around in circles and no prgress will be made and I'm going to let you decide where we stand.Busting out the insults now, are we? I've never disputed that the tire was tested at 279mph, I disputed your wrong assertion that that makes it over engineered.
But with all that aside, could you just acknowledge that you were wrong and move on?
RDF97As of late 1998, you could buy a car and equip it with a flame thrower in South Africa.
Is there a rule saying you can't do that in the US?
As of late 1998, you could buy a car and equip it with a flame thrower in South Africa.
The first Ford Mustang that was ever sold to the public was sold to a 22 year old school teacher.
http://autos.yahoo.com/blogs/motoramic/first-ford-mustang-owner-still-keys-49-years-123831938.html
The 1.8t engine in the audi tt had forged internals.
Most cars also do 0-60 in 6-7 seconds now-a-days....Most engines have forged internals these days me thinks.