- 26,628
- OREGON
- a6m5zero
@a6m5 ironically I actually have one of those scope/optics mounts. I haven't messed around with it in months though...lol...
@a6m5 ironically I actually have one of those scope/optics mounts. I haven't messed around with it in months though...lol...
Which gun do you have it on? I'm starting to consider getting a mount which replaces the rear sight on my USP.
Currently USP is sort of my third idle pistol? This kind of puts me on the fence, but still not totally against the idea. Thanks for bringing up a good point! 👍I actually tried it on a PX4 Storm. I'm going to try it again on my XDM 9 since I shoot it more often. I've also considered getting that very same mount you mentioned be decided otherwise. The issue O have with that mount is the idea of getting rid of your rear sight. If the optic goes bad I still want to be able to use my sights.
I’ve had plans for a gun in development for some time, maybe you guys can lend a say on the matter.
Stupidly simple firecracker rifle, as that’s about all I can get away with without a licence here. Breach loading barrel with a basic bbq lighter ignition system and a lead shot wrapped to the front of the fire cracker as a projectile.
Obviously I’m talking ancient tech here but it’s something I want to build myself from scratch and with basic workshop tools. I have no intention of it being anything more than a rifle to plink targets with.
I’ve drawn up some designs, yet to be completed, and wondered if there’s anything I should know before taking on this diy task.
You can harvest the black powder in the firecrackers to make it more powerful - a single firecracker alone will not give the lead balls sufficient energy to do anything - However, said powder is very fine and actually pretty potent in terms of pressure, you have to be really careful with it and work up your load. Also make sure there is enough material in the barrel wall.
And always make sure the projectile sits tightly on the charge or firecracker, there must not be any air space between the charge and the ball. If there is, the gun will turn into a pipe bomb.
All that being said, you might be better off (legally and in effectiveness) with a well designed slingshot. Don't let their archaic tech fool you, with good bands those can be very powerful. In fact, without access to good powder this might be your best bet.
Thanks for the advice. I’ve been slingshotting now for a while and I’m getting pretty accurate. I really only wanted to craft a gun as a project to prove to myself I could do it. I could alternatively go with a slingshot rifle which is equally as potent without dealing with black powder.
So true about the legality & safety concerns. Be careful @W3HSJust make sure you don't break any local laws!
I've decided to keep it, but you aren't in a hurry are you? I can definitely find out, but not sure how soon.@a6m5 I've been looking forward to hearing about your experience with the laser ever since you told us about acquiring one. Before you decide to return it, can you please test out the laser at night? I understand that there are other variables attributing to how visible the laser is at distance. But now I wonder what distance does the laser still remain visible to you at night?
With the fun I had at the range today I totally understand your itch. I totally scratched mine today.The itch to buy a Glock 45 and a G48 or G43x is getting hard for me to not scratch.
With the fun I had at the range today I totally understand your itch. I totally scratched mine today.
GLOCK may not be the best target pistol nor the best looking pistol, but in my humble opinion, in 9mm, it is the best combat pistol there is, and that right out of the box.
When I shot mine today I was amazed how little recoil and muzzle flip it had even with hot 124 grain loads, compared with other pistols I tried. With a high purchase on the grip most of the recoil is just straight-back, I could totally blast away AND hit stuff, after the recoil impulse the sights immediately aligned just naturally. Could not do that with any of the other guns I have tried so far.
That almost makes me want to try out a treated barrel with a brake, taming the little recoil it has.![]()
I'd be a little careful with a 1911 in 9x19, the 1911 was made with the dimensions and recoil of a .45 in mind. I've heard that they can be quite finicky at times, especially when it comes to extractors and timing. I'd go with an all-steel pistol that was designed from the ground up as a 9x19, like a high power or the 75.While I have done little shooting with a Glock, I have come around to it being pretty much the best combat pistol, especially when chambered in 9mm.
I also have an itch when it comes to a 1911 of some sort, but I have not been able to decide on one. I would also lean towards having it chambered in 9mm. I just do not really feel like adding another caliber.
Have you tried a CZ 75?
Michael88 I use to think a Glock G20 was the only Glock I'd ever need... Until I shot a Glock G17. Now that I've had a chance to shoot a G45, the G45 MOS is the next Glock I'll purchase when that time comes.
I'd third, or fourth Glock being the best combat pistol, at least out of what very few handguns I've shot. I can't prove it, but gun is highly accurate. I can prove how unbelievably reliable it is. I've been cleaning my G19 only when I can't stand how filthy it is anymore. It just shoots & shoots & shoots perfectly, every time.
Still training with minuscule progress at a time. I ditched 20 & 25 yards & started focusing on 15 yards. I can now consistently keep it in the 6" target at 15, but it's still all over the place within those 6". When I'm finally able to shoot something resembling groups, I think I'll move up to 25 yards.![]()
My sanctuary...
Hope everybody is out having a good time this weekend.[/SPOILER]
Michael88 I can't say that I'd enjoy shooting in those weather conditions...lol... As long as I can keep my core warm and dry, oddly enough it sounds like it would be a good time. Were you shooting under a covered structure?
Just for fun - and I want to duplicate true NATO-spec 124 FMJ, all the commercial 9x19 falls a little short of that. NATO Spec is 124 @ 360 meters a second // 1180 fps.What are you developing those faster rounds for?