Shirrako got banned on YouTube for a RDR2 gameplay video

Status
Not open for further replies.
tenor.gif
Since you're the person who by a wide margin is thinking of the children more than anyone else, what is the point supposed to be?

Perhaps a refresher for those who don't want to go through 8 pages of shouting how disgusting or butthurt they think others are.
 
Last edited:
You’re pathetic :lol: But can’t say I’m surprised, this is a fairly typical behaviour for butthurt SJWs... I wouldn’t be surprised if you started mass reporting Shirrako on GTP now, and ask for a ban for him :lol:
Y'know, this response is particularly humorous when one considers the degree of "butthurt"edness you've demonstrated over the action taken against someone else.

Oh, and the [sarcasm]absolute gold[/sarcasm] you've come up with in support of your argument that that action was wrong? I actually snorted at one point. Snorted. That's actually fairly atypical for me, since I usually get those really airy, squealy laughs* that start in my chest and bypass my vocal cords, the ones that make it hard to breathe and get me red in the face. I don't snort unless something really takes me by surprise and causes me to inhale sharply.

*Rather like Muttley, the canine sidekick of Dick Dastardly in the Hanna-Barbera cartoon Wacky Races:

 
Since you're the person who by a wide margin is thinking of the children more than anyone else, what is the point supposed to be?
Just stop with that nonsense. This is not "about the children" and it's simply not about "a violent videogame scene".
It's about targeting a certain demographic and riling up people using a game as a tool.
It's about spreading hatespeech and laughing about anti-feminist, sexist rhetoric.
It's about pouring oil on the flames of right wing filter bubbles, where many people take this stuff serious.

Oh and it has nothing to do with being "butthurt". It's a serious social issue and downplaying this is dangerous, backwards and enables much worse behaviour.
 
... and ultimately it's about Youtube being a private platform and having the right to chose what content they do and don't serve...
Actually the point of freedom of speech is that you can't be imprisoned for saying them. It doesn't guarantee you the use of a private company's platform to say them, and Youtube closing someone's account because they don't like the content they posted is not a free speech issue.

And thus:

200.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Posts

Back