Sir Jimmy Savile Dead

  • Thread starter dhandeh
  • 80 comments
  • 6,069 views

Sorry to hear about your sister.

While I have the utmost sympathy for Savile's alleged victims, it has already been pointed out that Savile is dead, and therefore cannot defend himself. Nor can he face trial for anything, but at the same time, dead people don't really care what happens to their reputation once they're gone.

Something should have been done while he was alive. Why this was not so needs to be found out and remedied as to prevent it happening again in the future.
 
GTP_Gearhead
I'm very passionate about sexual abuse.
When I was 18 my younger sister was raped. I returned home moments after it happend, our 20 year old neighbor she said.
I walked down the street, kicked in his door, beat the **** out of him, then called the police with his phone and waited.
I was arrested for assault, he did 6 years.

What in the HELL is wrong with our justice system? Put this man (Sevile) and the man who abused your sister away for life! Anyone who endangers the well being of a child and leaves them paralyzed with fear throughout their lives, does not deserve a place on this earth.

Indeed, rot in Hell, you sick pedophile.
 
What in the HELL is wrong with our justice system? Put this man (Sevile) and the man who abused your sister away for life! Anyone who endangers the well being of a child and leaves them paralyzed with fear throughout their lives, does not deserve a place on this earth.

Indeed, rot in Hell, you sick pedophile.

Savile is put away for life ..... 6 feet under for life. :lol:
 
Have you hear this coming out of police in England, sorry chaps:

- The number of Savile's alleged victims have climbed to an astonishing 450 victims, and the number of crimes committed by Savile between 1955 and 2009 numbered 214, including 34 rapes. Though most of Savile's crimes were committed when he was 40, that number is expected to rise.

- Locations of the crimes included 14 hospitals, a cancer hospice, schools, and a facility for troubled girls. Police say Savile traded on his fame and sought the most vulnerable victims.

- Though the youngest victim was 8, most victims were 13-16.

- "He could do anything he wanted," said Detective Supt. David Gray, who led the police investigation. "He could turn up at a school and say, 'Is anyone interested in meeting me?'"

- Several victims went to police in 2003, 2007, and 2008, but police believed Savile's explanations that they were false allegations and the price he paid for being a celebrity.

But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

Source
 
Well he's not around to defend himself.

As I and others have said, the bigger question here is why these claims weren't pursued while he was alive. Allegations of help from Thatcher herself are very disturbing. I find it absurd that the man was knighted and received an OBE and refer to him as Sir James out of annoyance; if people knew he was a kiddie fiddler, why was he still awarded these accolades?

You shouldn't protect a child molester.
 
When I see his face splashed across the tabloids, his repulsive smile just seems like he's giving us all the finger from beyond the grave, as if to say, "🤬 you all, I got away with it!" :yuck:
 
Yeah, the portrait gets uglier and uglier as the days go by... truly sickening. All the better he's gone, as it will save the victims the anguish of reopening all those wounds in a court trial. They can now out their stories on their own terms, at least. A small victory in an otherwise tragic circumstance, perhaps, but it's something.


Allegations of help from Thatcher herself are very disturbing.

That is disturbing. Would you mind posting the link to where you heard that? That's news to me and I'd like to read up on that more, if you don't mind.
 
That is disturbing. Would you mind posting the link to where you heard that? That's news to me and I'd like to read up on that more, if you don't mind.

I stress that it's an allegation, and I may have overstated it a tad. However, it has been made public that Savile was a personal guest of Thatcher's at Chequers, the Prime Minister's country retreat, on numerous occasions and recent papers have been published documenting the relationship the two have, as demonstrated in a Guardian article here and a Sun article here.

Now, of course it's putting 2+2 together and making a potential 5, but Savile, who it turns out was a known predator, visiting the Prime Minister at her official country residence is a bit iffy to me. Of course, they only discussed tax deductions for his charity, but there are several unreleased papers on the matter at the moment. I again ask myself how he was allowed to receive accolades such as a knighthood and an OBE if, as has been claimed, him being a predator was an open secret. He must have had some political protection somewhere.

But of course, the matter will remain unresolved with Savile being dead and Thatcher having dementia.
 
Well he's not around to defend himself.

As I and others have said, the bigger question here is why these claims weren't pursued while he was alive. Allegations of help from Thatcher herself are very disturbing. I find it absurd that the man was knighted and received an OBE and refer to him as Sir James out of annoyance; if people knew he was a kiddie fiddler, why was he still awarded these accolades?

You shouldn't protect a child molester.

Hard to believe not being in their shoes but I'm guessing that it isn't easy for a kid to tell parents and if the parents did know, it's not easy to push your kid in front of the world and say, "This freak 🤬 and 🤬 and 🤬 my kid. Easy sit back say what we would do in their shoes, but it's got to be horrific to go through this, both as a child and a parent. Sometimes you just want it all to go away.
 
I was referring to, and have been referring to throughout my posts, the fact that these incidents and Sir James' penchant for shagging "who(m)ever he can get his hands on" in his house and/or caravan was a known fact by adults; journalists, celebrities and other people in the public eye, when he was still alive. The newspapers who kissed his arse and called him a national treasure during his lifetime were double quick to call him a "vile paedo" with 'evidence' and contemporaneous adult testimony once he was dead and these claims started to surface.

Victims' privacy of course, but nobody decided to out and report him while he was alive. Not his superiors at the BBC, not News Of The Screws journalists. No-one. Kept it hush hush all this time. Even received both a KBE and an OBE. It again draws me back to the alleged politcal protection and whether they could even report it. Given the farce regarding North Walian care homes, Lord McAlpine and the Waterhouse Inquiry, I wouldn't be surprised if it did turn out to be true.

All in all, he's gotten away with it by meddling kids. Wonderful.
 
Last edited:
Apologies for the necro-post, but this thread needs closure to the question of Savile's misdeeds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile_sexual_abuse_scandal

The report of the investigations undertaken jointly by the police and the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), Giving Victims a Voice, was published on 11 January 2013. It reported allegations covering a period of fifty years, including 214 alleged acts by Savile which, though uncorroborated, have been formally recorded as crimes, some involving children as young as eight. The report states "within the recorded crimes there are 126 indecent acts and 34 rape/penetration offences."[6] Alleged offences took place at 13 hospitals as well as on BBC premises, according to the report.[6][7]In October 2013 it was announced that inquiries had been extended to other hospitals.[8] On 26 June 2014, the Secretary of State for Health, Jeremy Hunt, reported on the findings of the investigations led by Kate Lampard. He said that Savile had sexually assaulted victims aged between five and 75 in NHS hospitals, and apologised to the victims.[9] Further investigations, in hospitals and elsewhere, led to additional allegations of sexual abuse by Savile.
 
Last edited:
I'm not too familiar with the case, but I thought there were living victims (too?)
Yeah, the living victims and the sotto voce investigations revealed those crimes, but carefully said only that there were "additional allegations of sexual abuse". Supposedly, the reason Savile sought employment at the hospital was to gain access to corpses for himself and his clients.
 
Back