Chad Daddy
(Banned)
- 160
- Canada
- AngryGERMANkid1
I always hated that character. *Glares at picture* lol.
The Burger King was the best. Ronald Mcdonald is a creepy....ew.
I always hated that character. *Glares at picture* lol.
Now that i am aware of this buy credits feature i am more concerned than i was before have certainly been put off buying it without seeing what the score is from others first, Despite its flaws i was getting excited and ready to pre-order it but i refuse to support companies who dont want to improve amd i think the core gameplay should have been the priority, My experience with GT5 and now this thread makes what i said very much about GT6 for me untill i see its not the case
How can you not like that car though? I mean, it even has a livery!I always hated that character. *Glares at picture* lol.
Agreed. Burger King FTW! Ronald Mcdonald, I'll tear him apart due to being a clown.The Burger King was the best. Ronald Mcdonald is a creepy....ew.
Oh I like the car. But the character, not so much, haha.How can you not like that car though? I mean, it even has a livery!
How can you not like that car though? I mean, it even has a livery!
Thats the jokeUnderground 2 did.
You say you're taking it on board but then you ask this question..I'm taking on board
which shows you clearly are not taking on baord what issues people are having, Instead of Pd making the game with a certain idea in mind, For gt7 if not gt6 they may make the game in mind with selling virtual credits for real cash, Hence not forcing people to pay for virtual money but making the game so players are compelled to buy virtual money by making the game a very slow progress by giving out low credits, Before the 1st update for GT5 you could dupe any car and people on here use to cry about it "its not fair" "they should earn it blah blah" which i found laughble and wasnt shy in saying so, I coouldnt care less what people do if it doesnt effect my game play in anyway, This selling credits could shape the mould for the next GT not in a good way so it does effect my play, Although i just may be done with this franchise depending on GT6 and any potential rivals on Ps4So tell me, how will it effect your game that someone else is able to purchase credits?
Its not something you can disagree on, Its my concern, You may not share my concern but its not an opinionbut I don't agree with it.
The whole business case of Guild Wars 2 as a subscription-free MMORPG is predicated upon microtransactions, and my wife and I have been playing for a year without having to buy anything extra. Forza Motorsport 4 and Forza Horizon have the "Tokens" system, and I never even took advantage of the ones I was given for getting the Limited Collector's Editions. Just by playing normally, the Forza games swamped me with more credits than I could spend.Every game that had microtransactions that I know of are designed to enforce people to use real money.
That "you don't need to use it if you don't want to" is just naive.
It has the potential to be a slippery slope, for sure, but so far there have been lots of games with microtransactions that do nothing to force your hand.
I hope we can someday we can buy a new developer![]()
Instead of Pd making the game with a certain idea in mind, For gt7 if not gt6 they may make the game in mind with selling virtual credits for real cash, Hence not forcing people to pay for virtual money but making the game so players are compelled to buy virtual money by making the game a very slow progress by giving out low credits, Before the 1st update for GT5 you could dupe any car and people on here use to cry about it "its not fair" "they should earn it blah blah" which i found laughble and wasnt shy in saying so, I coouldnt care less what people do if it doesnt effect my game play in anyway, This selling credits could shape the mould for the next GT not in a good way so it does effect my play, Although i just may be done with this franchise depending on GT6 and any potential rivals on Ps4
Its not something you can disagree on, Its my concern, You may not share my concern but its not an opinion
Can't be. His hat is an adjustable rear wing, you know NFS underground doesn't do aero.
Its "my" concern, Thats not an opinion, Its not a bad move, Its a bad sign for us if its a success (my opinion), Its a dispicable model to basically take money for nothing (my opinion), I mean they are giving me the option to pay to get more cars after i've just spent hard cash on the game instead of offering me the option to unlock whatever i want for no charge, If you buy dlc you are paying for someones work, For extra credits you are getting robbedIs it a possible scenario? Well, yes.
Is there any evidence of it happening? No.
You're saying that selling credits for money is a bad move - it is an opinion. One with which I disagree.
Its "my" concern, Thats not an opinion, Its not a bad move, Its a bad sign for us if its a success (my opinion), Its a dispicable model to basically take money for nothing (my opinion), I mean they are giving me the option to pay to get more cars after i've just spent hard cash on the game instead of offering me the option to unlock whatever i want for no charge, If you buy dlc you are paying for someones work, For extra credits you are getting robbed
Vision GT: "I'm Lovin' it"I like cheeseburgers. Maybe McDonalds will have a Vision GT dlc car?
So if theres an arguement to be made for people with no time to grind so buying credits is a good option then theres an arguement to be made on why i cant play the whole game i just spent £40 without having to grind if i dont have time and without having to further splash out any more money, After i just spent 40 quid so i should be able to play it how i want
What gives, no Bacon?Vision GT: "I'm Lovin' it"
![]()
Comes in a $0.99 livery pack. Also includes Turkey and Canadian. Sounds like a bang for your buck to me.What gives, no Bacon?![]()