CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,306
- United States
Last edited:
SN8 testing tonight. Wet dress rehearsal or static fire is unknown at the moment. 24/7 live stream:
Definitely not the flight, that will be in daylight hours. Likely Friday. We don't know what they're doing tonight. My guess is WDR.Static fire tonight, right?
The video narrator literally just said they don't actually know if this will be static or the actual flight lol. No wonder I can't find any solid info on it.
The Chinese are in the midst of yet another impressive lunar mission.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-55148998
In other news, China's "Chang'e 5" lander has reached the Moon. It's planned to return to Earth with rock samples, with only the USA and Russia (well, the USSR) having done so before:
"Thought to" in the sense of "have clearly and openly stated"?They are thought to have ambitions of landing men on the moon.
As far as I'm aware, SpaceX has no specific ambitions to land on the Moon (though some of the people involved have made more ephemeral statements about lunar landings - crewed and uncrewed), so yes.Will they beat Musk?
And yet still the earliest crewed lunar landing planned.The NASA effort is years behind schedule and way over budget.
How behind and over budget is it?
In fact, the entire SLS program is over budget and behind schedule by more than 33 percent, compared to the baseline figures NASA gave Congress for 2019. And that will probably grow to 43 percent, the report says, as more schedule delays occur.
Nooooooooooo, really?The Space Launch System, or SLS, is the epicenter of NASA’s Artemis program
Meanwhile, at NASA:
The SLS is a vital component of the Artemis missions, which launch from next year with the uncrewed Artemis-1, crewed lunar orbit Artemis-2, and then the crewed lunar landing Artemis-3 in 2024 - the first crewed lunar landing since 1972.
I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is. $100 says NASA will not land a man on the moon (with the SLS) before October, 2026.Nooooooooooo, really?
So it's about a third over budget and a third behind schedule then. Seems pretty standard, and while I suppose two does class as multiple years (nine rather than seven), I don't think I'd be going for the hyperbolic "years behind schedule and way over budget" on the basis of those numbers.
Ooooooo... kay.I'm willing to put my money where my mouth is. $100 says NASA will not land a man on the moon (with the SLS) before October, 2026.
I think NASA could team with Musk to get there sooner. I think the military/economic competition with China could demand we compete as hard as we can for the Moon.Ooooooo... kay.
Not sure where that came from or why, or how it contributes to the discussion.
Already working on it.I think NASA could team with Musk to get there sooner. I think the military/economic competition with China could demand we compete as hard as we can for the Moon.
NASA has a confirmed, scheduled, crewed lunar landing program, with three planned missions. SpaceX has no confirmed, scheduled, crewed lunar landing program, with zero planned missions.I think NASA could team with Musk to get there sooner.
Flight testing has barely started. Nice that you dismiss it so quickly. One step at a time, though I'd expect you of all people to know that. Not really liking your attitude in this thread.SpaceX may set to test its "Starship", with purported lunar and Mars landing capabilities, with a short hop up to half the height of a commercial airliner shortly, but that's some way short of a full lunar program
That being what I said, yes.Flight testing has barely started.
Where?Nice that you dismiss it so quickly.
That being the point of what I said, yes.One step at a time, though I'd expect you of all people to know that.
I mean, you derailed it for a page taking personal offence at a nickname for Musk - which you thought was an insult aimed at SpaceX, and then decided was done entirely for the purpose of winding you up specifically, for some reason - and are now seemingly taking offence at a point you appear to agree with, but sure thing, it's my attitude that's the problem.Not really liking your attitude in this thread.
I believe this is a strategically necessary partnership between the USG and Musk. We are in strategic competition with China for the Moon's resources and militarily strategic location. China has avoided signing on to any treaty including the Artemis Accords regarding rules for sharing its resources and science for the benefit of humanity.
Not surprising that China would go their own way. Just how they are. Meanwhile they're dumping rockets on villagers...I believe this is a strategically necessary partnership between the USG and Musk. We are in strategic competition with China for the Moon's resources and militarily strategic location. China has avoided signing on to any treaty including the Artemis Accords regarding rules for sharing its resources and science for the benefit of humanity.
https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/13...s-accords-8-countries-moon-outer-space-treaty
I found it interesting that it collapsed at exactly the same moment that they had a drone watching the cables. They've said they are looking into replacing it, so hopefully that happens.Footage from the Arecibo Telescope Collapse.
I found it interesting that it collapsed at exactly the same moment that they had a drone watching the cables. They've said they are looking into replacing it, so hopefully that happens.
Footage from the Arecibo Telescope Collapse.
such a sad day for science.
Really is unfortunate that it wasn't able to hold together long enough for them to find a proper solution to recovering that receiver platform.
Yeah, they were exploring options to salvage it during a controlled demolition, but after the full extent of the damage was revealed last month they decided there was nothing to do but wait for the inevitable.As I understand it the decay was found to be so advanced in the cables and supports that it wasn't safe to put workers on the site. Failing tensile cables are a complete no-go. A real shame all round.
But slim funds for the landing systems made available to NASA by Congress, as well as uncertainty over the incoming Biden administration’s views on space exploration, have threatened to delay NASA’s decision to advance the lunar lander contracts.
The more companies doing this the better. Granted BO hasn't even put a rocket into orbit yet, so I'll believe it when I see it.Jeff Bezos announces his company Blue Origin will be first to land a woman on the Moon by 2024. He is competing with Musk and the NASA contractors as a third team to build the lander, rocket and motor systems.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/UKNews1/idUKKBN28F0Q7?utm_source=reddit.com