Quadrillion???
I get it at slightly under 9 billion times the volume... The sun at about 1.5 trillion cubic kilometers, and the black hole at about 1.3*10^22.
Volume is 4/3*pi*r^3 (r cubed) - if the diameter is 90000x bigger then the radius is 45000x bigger, and 45000 cubed is about 1 quadrillion.
I don't get why we can't see black holes if something like the movie Interstellar was supposed to portray a reasonably accurate representation of one. Surely we could see the Event Horizon of something so unbelievably massive?
Pretty sure we can with the gravitational lensing, but that's not technically directly observing the black hole, only seeing its effects on its surroundings.
That's what I mean, we still don't have any pictures of a black hole bending the surrounding light into a glowing halo. If they are huge we should see a big black hole with a glowing outline.
That's what I mean, we still don't have any pictures of a black hole bending the surrounding light into a glowing halo. If they are huge we should see a big black hole with a glowing outline.
130 billion km... so your volume calculation is out by 9 orders of magnitude!!It says the diameter is 130mil km
130 billion km... so your volume calculation is out by 9 orders of magnitude!!
We can see from comparing Earth with Jupiter that it's not the density that makes gravity, but the mass. So even though it's nearly a quadrillion solar volumes (I get a little over 800 trillion times,) its mass is "only" 21 billion suns.
So who amongst us here knows how matter is spread inside the event horizon? Is most of the volume actually vacuum but with so much mass at the center that it can sling that event horizon that far out?
A spectacular new image of the Milky Way has been released to mark the completion of the APEX Telescope Large Area Survey of the Galaxy (ATLASGAL). The APEX telescope in Chile has mapped the full area of the Galactic Plane visible from the southern hemisphere for the first time at submillimetre wavelengths — between infrared light and radio waves — and in finer detail than recent space-based surveys. The pioneering 12-metre APEX telescope allows astronomers to study the cold Universe: gas and dust only a few tens of degrees above absolute zero.
I read that earlier in the week, good theory however I wouldn't like to be the first one to be in there. Similar to the Felix guy who jumped from the edge of space, you just don't know till it's been done.This guy says we will be able to get people to Mars in one month with "photonic propulsion".
NASA Scientist: I can get humans to Mars in a month
http://usat.ly/20ZEXdu
I don't think I would like to go to Mars, it doesn't look like a good time. But, I'll sure and heck watch people try.I read that earlier in the week, good theory however I wouldn't like to be the first one to be in there. Similar to the Felix guy who jumped from the edge of space, you just don't know till it's been done.
Mercury. So close yet so far away. But plenty of energy, perhaps even sufficient to operate this stuff.If this "phototonic propulsion" is all it's cracked put to be, maybe we can just skip Mars?