Think I might try get a little extra out of mine, not sure how much more it has in it
All my rwd suspensions are same, max ride height. Hard rear, soft front, all dampers and roll on 1. 4.0+ camber front, 0 rear. - 1.00 toe front and - 0.25 rearI might have stumbled upon a technique that gt6 physics likes much the way we figured out what worked best with gt5 suspension physics. Discovered while tinkering around with my rx7. I told Mikey about it. We need to test it on other rwd cars. I wonder if anyone else possibly has a clue what I'm talking about here...
All my rwd suspensions are same, max ride height. Hard rear, soft front, all dampers and roll on 1. 4.0+ camber front, 0 rear. - 1.00 toe front and - 0.25 rear
I might have stumbled upon a technique that gt6 physics likes much the way we figured out what worked best with gt5 suspension physics. It's just a theory at the moment. Something no one else has mentioned. Discovered while tinkering around with my rx7. My theory needs more testing out with other rwd cars to know whether it holds water or not and needs testing on more than one car, typically rwd type drivetrains. We need to test it on other rwd cars. I wonder if anyone else possibly has a clue what I'm talking about here...
Shoot, sorry wraith, I just saw your messaget now. I'll test In a few minutes and answer your pm in a while. Sorry.
Meanwhile....somewhere in the 05 GT
View attachment 483485
Just got a 8.086........................................ sigh. Guess I'll go back out there.
It was a nice job until someone ran a 8.084.Nice job 👍
Man all these fast 05 GT's and I'm over here still with 8.086. Guess I'll have to mess with the suspension or something like you said. Good job on the new time.Ford GT '05
Wing doesn't help I just happened to have it on when time was made. But other things helped.
This car needs some specific suspension settings, camber and toe setup to get the most out of its drivetrain.
Thanks to Mikey 👍 yesterday who who in collaborative effort helped me validate my theory with various settings with successive results.
I'll have to get back onto mine, not sure I'll match your time because tbh, I know it's fast and that's all I care about. I prefer to use these leader boards as guidelines rather than going for the best time. 8.084 is a very nice time thoughFord GT '05
Wing doesn't help I just happened to have it on when time was made. But other things helped.
This car needs some specific suspension settings, camber and toe setup to get the most out of its drivetrain.
Thanks to Mikey 👍 yesterday who who in collaborative effort helped me validate my theory with various settings with successive results.
Man all these fast 05 GT's and I'm over still with 8.086. Guess I'll have to mess with the suspension or something like you said. Good job on the new time.
Nice, my 8.112 can still be improved with a little suspension tweaks. . The 06 is my baby and I will put as much time as needed to stay #1 or #2.:tup:Thanks. Working on the 06 now and don't worry... your time is safe for now . I found that the 06 doesn't have any special rear springs configuration which it prefers which the 05 does, but toe, well that's a different story. The 06 has an imbalance on weight distribution and is too front heavy. It's why it's slower than the 05 model. My original tune with tweaks is already running 8:123
I'll have to get back onto mine, not sure I'll match your time because tbh, I know it's fast and that's all I care about. I prefer to use these leader boards as guidelines rather than going for the best time. 8.084 is a very nice time though