- 1,386
- Virginia
- FordGT40Guy
- FordGTGuy
Loading is around 1-3 seconds on my Gen 4 x4 Samsung 990 Evo Pro.I agree, it's not a true next gen title despite what Todd Howard says. It needs to be on an SSD because it's loading a lot of data and there's a lot of loading required. But ultimately, it is on an old game engine that's showing it's age now.
That said, I am not letting any of those things spoil it for me, the loading is a minor irrittation for me, it takes about 3 or 4 seconds to load a new area on the SSD I have it installed on and I'm having a blast with the game. So while people perhaps aren't wrong about it not running as well as it could/should be expected to, the game isn't terrible as a result.
Of course, not everyone will like it, but I think there's a lot of bandwagon jumping going on with this game. It's become trendy to knock it. Todd Howard hasn't done himself any favours say it is a next gen title and people might just need to upgrade thier PC's though. But I'm still having a blast with it.
Not to take away from your point but man... imagine hearing someone complain about 4 second load times in the og Xbox era.
Kids won't know how long you would wait just for Windows to boot.
Just so you can play Warcraft at 640x480, Not World of Warcraft but the original Warcraft RTS games.
Last edited: