In Formula 1 - and especially in Ferrari - you perform or you get out. What Raikkonen did once upon a time is inconsequential to what he is doing now.I think it's a bit too early to erase all they've done in the past just because of 6 months of disappointments.
It should be like that, but it isn't in my opinion. There are other factors, not only the on-track performance. There are political and marketing reasons, especially in Ferrari.In Formula 1 - and especially in Ferrari - you perform or you get out. What Raikkonen did once upon a time is inconsequential to what he is doing now.
It has been rumored that Raikkonen's car has 15kg more than Alonso's.Massa had a brain injury, so his poor performances may be excused. As far as I'm aware, Raikkonen hasn't had a brain injury of any kind.
Massa had a brain injury, so his poor performances may be excused. As far as I'm aware, Raikkonen hasn't had a brain injury of any kind.
Then that's Raikkonen's problem.It has been rumored that Raikkonen's car has 15kg more than Alonso's.
You've always had a problem with Kimi because he's a popular driver, haven't you?It sounds like an excuse cooked up by Raikkonen's militant fanbase to explain away his poor performances as being somebody else's problem because Raikkonen really is super-talented, but he just hasn't had the chance to demonstrate it.
It's the way that popularity is expressed that bothers me. I used to post over on the Autosport forums, and if anyone dared to criticise Raikkonen - even if you tried to back those arguments up with a sustained, logical argument, as I did - his fans would treat them as fair game. Entire conversations would be disrupted, to the point where the moderators would have to shut the thread down and clean up the mess. It got to the point where they actually started banning people for criticising Raikkonen; not because they were fans, but because it was easier to do than to clean out the trouble-makers. I have never met a more aggressive or childish group of fanboys, to the point where you can use "Raikkonen" as the collective noun for fanboys. They're more than willing to dish it out to any other driver, but when it comes time to consider Raikkonen's flaws, they can't take it. I don't expect to convert anyone, just to hear me out - and if you take issue with something I say, counter it with a valid argument of your own.You've always had a problem with Kimi because he's a popular driver, haven't you?
The problem is that flashes aren't enough. I'd expect every driver in Formula 1 to be at or near their very best all the time. Not for 2% of the time.Kimi has shown flashes of his old self this season.
First off, your reply to me was top notch. I see where you are coming from.The problem is that flashes aren't enough. I'd expect every driver in Formula 1 to be at or near their very best all the time. Not for 2% of the time.
Which is why he should be let go.in many races it looks like he doesn't even try.