I would have said more powerful and fascinating than distasteful. A good reminder to people who thankfully never had to live through the horrors of the war that these events actually occurred right where they're standing. Should we just forget then?Is it just me? I find these photos to be terribly distasteful.
Ok, you do have a point. I will now attack the pisspoor photoshoping they did.I would have said more powerful and fascinating than distasteful. A good reminder to people who thankfully never had to live through the horrors of the war that these events actually occurred right where they're standing. Should we just forget then?
Ok, you do have a point. I will now attack the pisspoor photoshoping they did.
Every time I stop laughing, I look back at my screen and see this
Such things are often done far better by actual photographers, the ones who are in it for the art. With significantly better results. Not the type of people Huffington Post hires.
I would say attacking the quality of what was an honest attempt at drawing out the reality of a horrible event is much more distasteful than actually making said photos. But I guess that's just me.
Yup, the Guardian did a much better job - http://www.theguardian.com/artandde...y-landings-scenes-in-1944-and-now-interactive
(click the images for the transition)
The history of video games by controllers.
I'm wondering if this is an old test, a fake, or if kids these days actually watch that show.
We do watch that show.I'm wondering if this is an old test, a fake, or if kids these days actually watch that show.