JohnBM01Did you see "Watch Dogs" just now? Crazy! Maybe one of the finest concepts in gaming today the way the game is executed.
Excuse me. I've drunk some captain Morgan's.
What is watch dogs?
Excuse me. I've drunk some captain Morgan's.
What is watch dogs?
A game that just stole the show at E3.
It looked... sweet.
RACECARLook 9 posts up.
Edit: Dammit II-zOoLoGy-II , dun messed up my post count
GT_johanUbisoft had the best conference at this moment
I'm not too sure, Rockstar usually don't attend E3. I heard Agent might be shown though, so we'll see.Do you guys thinks GTA5 will be shown at Sony conference?
Stormtrooper217"If it's rated M and has tons of violence, it's a great game."
It's true!
A game that just stole the show at E3.
It looked... sweet.
...a surprise GT6 announcement would be nice though
TygerI'm hoping for The Last Guardian and The Last Of Us updates from Sony, a surprise GT6 announcement would be nice though
A game that just stole the show at E3.
It looked... sweet.
What a way to ruin the mood. Shame.Wow, Watch Dogs looks awesome, but (and I'm sorry) it being Ubisoft makes me seriously doubt that it will end up being a properly great game. I loved Assassin's Creed, Rainbow Six Vegas, Splinter Cell: Conviction and Driver San Francisco, but none of them are truly great because they all have some sort of flaw that ruins the whole thing. AC1 was too repetitive. AC2 had a ludicrous plot involving aliens, ALIENS! R6V was just generally shonky, SC:C was more about killing people quietly and/or stylishly than it was about avoiding them in the first place and had always-on DRM, D:SF was great fun but the story so far is just a dream sequence. This game will probably be great fun to actually play but the story will be lame, or it'll have a great story but it'll fail to capitalise on that 'interference' mechanic or something. Still, all of the aforementioned games were fun to play (when they worked, in some cases), I'm just saying there's usually at least really one big and obvious flaw in Ubisoft games that hold them back from being truly spectacular, which is always a shame.
[Opinions] Factswow, watch dogs looks awesome, but (and i'm sorry) it being ubisoft makes me seriously doubt that it will end up being a properly great game. I loved assassin's creed, rainbow six vegas, splinter cell: Conviction and driver san francisco, but none of them are truly great because they all have some sort of flaw that ruins the whole thing. Ac1 was too repetitive. Ac2 had a ludicrous plot involving aliens, aliens! R6v was just generally shonky, sc:c was more about killing people quietly and/or stylishly than it was about avoiding them in the first place and had always-on drm, d:sf was great fun but the story so far is just a dream sequence. This game will probably be great fun to actually play but the story will be lame, or it'll have a great story but it'll fail to capitalise on that 'interference' mechanic or something. Still, all of the aforementioned games were fun to play (when they worked, in some cases), i'm just saying there's usually at least really one big and obvious flaw in ubisoft games that hold them back from being truly spectacular, which is always a shame.
Guardian is dead.
TygerThis made me look it up, Wiki says of the chief designer "Further complications, including Ueda's departure as a full-time employee of Sony though remaining as a consultant on the project, have left the release date in question." which doesn't imply to me that it's necessarily dead, but it does seem an odd situation. Who decides the designer and director of a project is suddenly just a "consultant"?
EDIT: I should have simply read further down the page. Still seems a strange situation but development has not stalled, it's just slow. Reminiscent of a certain driving game franchise in some ways.
Anyhow Sony is up.
Only on SPIKE.