The story is worthy of a movie but what would make it better is if there is a Ferrari perspective with their own set of non-fiction characters. The trailer has that side absent. It's all a one-sided affair and since it is known that Ford wins the Le Mans race, it just makes the film an 'America wins' trope.
Then again considering the history of Ferrari's salty affairs, they would very likely embargo their non-fictional character appearances in the film.
It's all about ticket sales. At least it's not another "blow everything up" superhero or Transformers movie.Another U.S. propaganda film, it seems.
It's all about ticket sales. At least it's not another "blow everything up" superhero or Transformers movie.
But I didn’t expect an underdog story here, but somehow they managed to make the biggest car manufacturer in the world seem like the little GT that could. Another U.S. propaganda film, it seems. Still, glad to see this story get told on the big screen, despite the obvious bias.
Ford may have had more money, but up until that point they never seriously invested any of it into motorsports. This was them saying "We're gonna beat you on your own turf" and actually doing it. The story is a true underdog story in that sense. Ferrari is motorsport.Not to mention how they’re making Ford seem like the underdogs. They have a considerably larger amount of resources and funds at their disposal. Ford literally threw money at the problem to win Ferrari, whereas the Italians fought more with less and defeated Ford in every other front of endurance racing. The GT40 was successful at Le Mans, but Ferrari did much better overall.
But I didn’t expect an underdog story here, but somehow they managed to make the biggest car manufacturer in the world seem like the little GT that could. Another U.S. propaganda film, it seems. Still, glad to see this story get told on the big screen, despite the obvious bias.
That's a bit of a stretch. I don't think anything can come close to being as bad as Driven.What trailer did you watch? The crashes are so over the top that they're almost on a par with Driven's.
Le Mans Directed by Michael Bay.At least it's not another "blow everything up" superhero or Transformers movie.
Actually, I was getting really excited and hyped for the movie, that is, until I saw those crazy crashes. My excitement dropped a bit.What trailer did you watch? The crashes are so over the top that they're almost on a par with Driven's.
I meant that the CG isn't really noticeable.What trailer did you watch? The crashes are so over the top that they're almost on a par with Driven's.
That wouldn't have been the first time cars have gone airborne at the Dunlop curve. Take the unfortunate 1955 Le Mans disaster for example.View attachment 825495
How did that get there?
The film looks to be a good film, but going by the trailer, they've went way overboard on making the crashes look spectacular.
AlsoThat wouldn't have been the first time cars have gone airborne at the Dunlop curve. Take the unfortunate 1955 Le Mans disaster for example.
That wouldn't have been the first time cars have gone airborne at the Dunlop curve. Take the unfortunate 1955 Le Mans disaster for example.
The 1955 Le Mans crash happened opposite the pits, as some cars tangled, not after the Dunlop curve.That wouldn't have been the first time cars have gone airborne at the Dunlop curve. Take the unfortunate 1955 Le Mans disaster for example.
Also
Guess we'll have to see the movie.A Ferrari 250 is nothing like a Mercedes CLR.
What did the 250 hit to get it to do that?
Yeah, I'll definitely skip the next Furious movies. The last one is just stupid, not stupid fun anymore.Movies with historical racing themes rarely come around so I’ll take it. Don’t need another ‘Furious’ sequel.
What did the 250 hit to get it to do that?
By the time Ford's initial attempt to spend millions of dollars invest in Le Mans specifically (by just buying Ferrari) had failed, Ford had already been working with Lotus at Indianapolis (which was one of the big reasons the Ferrari sale fell through), had been directly supporting NASCAR and NHRA efforts for at least a half a decade, and were partners Shelby's racing efforts with the Cobra.Ford may have had more money, but up until that point they never seriously invested any of it into motorsports.
Henry Ford literally founded Ford (well, the Henry Ford Company, which fell over and sort-of became Ford Motor Company the following year) on the winnings of a motor race...Sure but even still Ferrari has been doing motor sport since the 30s. Ford was still the relative new guy in sports car racing