You didnt look stupid at all. Thanks, cheers
Except that this is nothing new. He comes in and tries to dictate things to people, and defends it with lies, goal-posts moving, and insults. So when he comes in again, and again, and again, doing the exact same things as before, he is going to get the same responses that he got the previous time. Just because he wants to ignore people because he can't seem to back up his false claims, or ridiculous posts, doesn't mean much, really.
Good? I doubt it, but you do have reasons, which are right there in the quote above this one.
So instead of listening to people who only want you to be a better, more constructive member of the forum, you block them and continue to ignore the vast amounts of very understandable criticism against you? Protip: if you actually want to be considered a decent member of GTP, don't ignore people when they call you out on ********. Which, given the way you typically act here, they have every right to do.
When someone posts false claims, lies, or dictates how people should be doing something, they are going to be called out on it. If their solution to that is to ignore someone because they don't see the wrong in what they're doing, that's their own fault, not mine. Just because he removed himself from the discussion he started, doesn't mean the discussion is over, with or without him it will get discussed.
Please, show me what I've speculated.
I listen to the people I want, you are not forced to listen (read) everybody here.
And that's the problem. Those people you block - all they want is for you to be a good and productive member of the forum. Same for anyone who criticizes you for lying and moving the goalposts, both of which you do quite often.
Where was he attacked? He came in, posted a statement of fact and tried labeling it as an opinion(like usual), and got called out on it. His response to that was to ignore the situation he brought up on his own. Having an opinion doesn't mean its free from criticism, nor does it mean that it can't be wrong.
And that's why I ignored them. They try to quote me non stop and try to force me to change my opinion and agree with them. lol
Nope, they dont want me or anyone to be a better member or something like that, all they want is try win arguments at all costs, like if this was an argument competition (I guess that makes them feel happy or something) and they are soooo tiring that I ended up ignoring them.
I have a hunch that you only see it that way because you want to. Protip #2: if someone criticizes you for something here on GTP, it usually warrants going back and seeing if it's actually, objectively true, especially if they do it repeatedly. Seeing a discussion as an argument doesn't help, either.
No. I think impartiality doesnt exist, its all opinions, you cannot calculate the perfect impartiality
He's making a statement fact and trying to disguise it as an opinion. All that is is a preference to his own self, no one else. So it's ridiculous to come in to tell people what they should or shouldn't like, or what they should or shouldn't complain about.
Actually, it was. It can't really be demonstrated any clearer to you than it already has, unless you want to fill this thread with examples of him doing the same thing regarding other topics. And strangely, it's continued mostly because you're white knighting for him.
This started out way before this. All this is is a continuation to his off posting style. He, like usual, is dictating what people should like based on his own preference.
