The GTPlanet 1/4 MILE Record thread!!

  • Thread starter mafia_boy
  • 1,251 comments
  • 155,332 views
You can still give in.s@ne and Macca agro, I don't know their excuses. :P

*added bit*
Why isn't there a k-car section?

is it pointless, or has someone already asked this question?

It is pointless. I want the fastest....the K-cars are no where near that category.
 
Last edited:
That's too bad. I wanted to see who would get the fastest time with a Mazda Autozam:(

You can do that but it would mor than likley be in the spot race section.No ones stoping your from doing it. It wiill be a record but it just wouldnt be on the list.Hey just did a pb of 8.135 almost there.
 
Last edited:
Nice time, mazdaman ;)

I gave a few more attempts last night, which went into the morning...
groupy-1.jpg


I'm most happy with the Viper time, believe it or not :D
 
Dammit that's two people past me in the RX-7...

Oh well you're all on PAL and therefore cheaters.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :lol:
 
Dammit that's two people past me in the RX-7...

Oh well you're all on PAL and therefore cheaters.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :lol:

Hehe, as far as I know the advantage has allways been on the NTSC version of GT4
How about PM'ing me your Spirit R setup for test, so that we could determin if PAL really is better?

I have read somewhere ,that I-Runner had boght NTSC and PAL version of GT4.
And that the cars were faster on NTSC compared to PAL with the exact same setup. :nervous:
I think he mentioned this being the case with Escudo.



MadMax
 
Something i found wierd was when i ran the car and did the pb i slowed down at the end to 283km.
IMG00066.jpg
Im posting to records as you can see.
 
Last edited:
I have read somewhere ,that I-Runner had boght NTSC and PAL version of GT4.
And that the cars were faster on NTSC compared to PAL with the exact same setup. :nervous:
I think he mentioned this being the case with Escudo.

MadMax
The Escudo wasn't faster in NTSC, but the setup wouldn't work for both versions. It's also the same with the Spec C, and the Toyota GT-One for max speed ;) Shame I'm stuck with PAL...

Mazdaman, maybe the car topped out just as you crossed the line? My best in the V-Spec with NOS is 7.698 ;)

I've also ran 11.634 in the SRT-4 and 7.885 in the Esprit 350.
 
The Escudo wasn't faster in NTSC, but the setup wouldn't work for both versions. It's also the same with the Spec C, and the Toyota GT-One for max speed ;) Shame I'm stuck with PAL...

Mazdaman, maybe the car topped out just as you crossed the line? My best in the V-Spec with NOS is 7.698 ;)

I've also ran 11.634 in the SRT-4 and 7.885 in the Esprit 350.

It did'nt i let off pm me.
 
I thought I had a bit of room left in the Spirit R...

RX7.jpg


*whistles innocently*

I also managed 7.409 in the Minolta, and 7.525 in the Audi R8 👍
 
I just uploaded this:


spooncivicmazda110sstre.jpg


update2010.jpg


Times are:
RERUN Spoon Civic Type R [EK) '00 - 11.453 (Update)
Mazda 110S (L10A) '67 - 10.144 (Pre 1975 Non USA entry)
RERUN Auto Union V16 Type C Streamline '37 - 9.095 (Update)

Shelby Mustang G.T. 350R '65 - 9.682
Pontiac GTO 5.7 Coupe '04 - 9.331
TVR Tamora '02 - 9.086
Chevrolet Corvette Z06 (C2) Race Car '63 - 8.758
Ginetta G4 '64 - 9.898 (Another pre 1975 Non USA entry)
Pontiac Sunfire GXP Concept '02 - 11.670
Nissan Primera 20V '01 - 11.787

Again a 1000m sprint pic got lost in, sorry about that.



Nice change in the outlook Mafs 👍



MadMax
 
Last edited:
That photo doesn't tell me whether they were done at Las Vegas or Test Course. So I won't accept it at the moment.....re-do the photo to show those times were done at Las Vegas and I'll consider them more. :)
 
Good times there evokid , I'm sorry to say this, but I find those Lancer times of yours look very fishy
or you'd had to have found some miracle setup for them.
And by that photo I see you'd done 9 setups/runs in 1 day :nervous:

Newer the less, very close to my Esprit 350 and Integra DC5 records 👍
And you have some work left done in the Spirit R :mischievous:

And.. take these cars to Las Vegas Drag Strip so that mafia_boy accepts them.



MadMax
 
i did them times whats up with that, what i am to good, come 2 where i lie let me show u up

i will put up times every day, if u do not think that they are real i could send u the set up, and u can put your touch to it, ladies_dream_boy@hotmail.com
 

Attachments

  • 02022010003[1].jpg
    02022010003[1].jpg
    84.3 KB · Views: 29
  • 02022010005[1].jpg
    02022010005[1].jpg
    86 KB · Views: 26
Last edited by a moderator:
Those times are pretty good. And I do believe you've really done them.
You have a good basic setup for 4WD's in general. 👍

But where did the '94 Evo IV - 8.064 time disappear from the list?
And that Evo '92 - 8.559 is still making me suspicious,
but well I have published a setup for the same car here.
Could you give me a hint, point to right direction ,
where (transmission?) the setup has room for improvement?



MadMax
 
I will accept those times because you re-did the photo which I requested and it says plain as day Las Vegas. 👍 There are a lot of decent times there.

HOWEVER, please make sure you send 'session record' photos like the rest of the crew (including myself) do. I let these go in normally if the tuner has put in previous records as an unwritten rule to myself because they have shown their session record times and/or put up YouTube videos.

As for Max, he's a bit confused as to how you've gotten such a quick time with the Evo 1, as am I. I'm not going to doubt it because it has been proven to me before when I've questioned it. Max, your setup is for the Evo 2 which is slightly different in setup to what an Evo 1 should be.

*added bit* All times are now updated.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back