Yes there is: There's a differentiation, one that doesn't make sense.
If you could tell who was homosexual on sight do you think that would all still be true?
In recent years, sure. But not always.
Except how homosexual relations were in fact illegal until just a few decades ago. Or how about how in many states there are absolutely no laws against discrimination towards someone within the workplace in regards to his or her sexual orientation? What about the cases where kids have been suspended from school for wearing something not supposedly appropriate for his or her gender, or when kids have been suspended for exhibiting any sort of homosexual behavior whatsoever?
Like surprise butt sex?
I can't imagine how else it affects you.
No one being allowed to criticize it. What ever happened to freedom of speech?
What government tried to stop you from saying something? Not that it applies, but how were you prevented from saying something here? Your post is still there.
Hmm, I sense judgment in that tone, but someone else is rude for asking you to clarify your remarks?
Michael Sam is a perfect example of homosexuality going overboard, he literally smeared cake on his lovers face and well you know the rest. Homosexuals are forcing their agenda upon people; school assemblies advocating homosexuality are the perfect example for promoting this agenda, why were we forced to attend these as teenagers. People get vilified for challenging it. Liberals are very narrow minded people always proclaiming their openness yet bash others on their stance. Homosexuality just like heterosexuality is a bedroom situation, which the government shouldn't be involved in promoting. I don't how anyone can argue with this. Rand Paul 2016 wooo wooooHmm, I sense judgment in that tone, but someone else is rude for asking you to clarify your remarks?
Also, unless it affects you? You have every choice regarding who you choose to associate with, so I don't think there will be a case when what two consenting adults do in their own private lives is going to start harmfully affecting you. Unless we're talking an uprising here, and you think homosexuals are going to start the third world war or something
You know the rest? You mean two men kissed? Yes, you must of contracted cancer from such a horrible sight. What's that? Nothing about them kissing affected you other than making you uncomfortable because of your beliefs? I get uncomfortable when when any couple, regardless of sexual orientation, feel the need to make out like 15-year-old's at a restaurant or other public venue, despite the fact that I've only seen straight couples do so. You know what I do? Look away.
Ooh goody, the word "agenda" again. I love seeing "forced" and "agenda" used together. So has a gay couple ever rang your doorbell and asked to come into your house to tell you how you should accept homosexuality? I know religious groups have asked me to do so. Hell, the girl scouts are pushier when they're trying to sell cookies. It's a debate, and there are sides to said debate. Just because a group of people believe differently than another group of people doesn't mean the former is pushing an "agenda." For the record, most schools are actively against any sort of mention of homosexuality within their walls. Yours wasn't? Well, then maybe it's because your school doesn't want some of their students fearing for their lives, or committing suicide because of social pressure and bullying, or simply wish the students would all treat each other equally and respectfully.
You're not being vilified for disagreeing. You're being presented with an opposing argument, made with facts, and with respectful intentions. You can cry about it and say I have to respect your side, or you can continue such a discussion with respectful, countering arguments. On the same topic: how come it's always okay for someone against homosexuality or gay marriage to outright say another human being does not deserve to be treated respectfully and to call another human being an abomination, but it's not okay for someone opposing that stance to say it's disrespectful for someone to treat a human being that way?
Government shouldn't be promoting it, huh? Then government should stay out of marriage as a whole, right? Or should government condemn homosexuality solely because it's what you believe, despite that not being the majority belief within the United States? It also stops being a governmental issue when the government stops deciding homosexual couples are not lawfully allowed to get equal benefits as straight couples, like whether or not they get to collect estate if a partner dies, or whether or not their children get taken away if one of them dies.
Your not a member of staff so please do not act as one.
