- 27,219
- United Kingdom
Which to be blunt show a very messed up concept of what 'rights' actually entail.
Very much so. I'm actually at a loss as to describe how someone given the exact same rights as me somehow diminishes my exact same rights.
Which to be blunt show a very messed up concept of what 'rights' actually entail.
homeforsummerVery much so. I'm actually at a loss as to describe how someone given the exact same rights as me somehow diminishes my exact same rights.
Nicely put, although an argument for why getting a tattoo isn't a sin would win you BONUS POINTS!
This preacher makes a good case in this sermon on gay rights equality.
Though, if he really used the word "imbecile" then I have to give him some credit; that's a great word.
You could argue that the lifestyle (by which I mean engaging in sexual actions and relationships with people of your gender, not gay bars and musicals) is a choice, but not the desires.
Just as much of a choice as engaging in heterosexual actions and relationships.
This preacher makes a good case in this sermon on gay rights equality.
You could argue that the lifestyle (by which I mean engaging in sexual actions and relationships with people of your gender, not gay bars and musicals) is a choice, but not the desires.
You could if it were an actual lifestyle.
Are you seriously saying that acting on mutual sexual attraction is a lifestyle choice?
Maybe lifestyle wasn't the best choice of word. What I meant is that you can't choose who you're attracted to, but you can still choose who you go to bed with (in most cases).
So you do serious expect homosexuals to never have sex (unless of course its hetrosexual), how exactly does that benefit them or society in general (given that enforced celibacy for priests works out so well)?
I never said anything about stopping them. I was simply making the point that sexual actions we engage in, regardless of orientation, are a choice, but desires aren't.
The head of the Catholic Church in Britain wrote an opinion piece on why same-sex marriage should never be introduced into Britain. Here is the aforementioned article, complete with a list of logical fallacies he used.
That I don't disagree with, however I don't see how its relevant to this discussion at all?
There's this really cocky kid at my school who calls everyone an idiot who doesn't agree with him. Yesterday, he called me an imbecile for thinking that homosexuality occurs naturally and not believing that homosexuality is a choice and that it is chosen for attention.
How is it a choice?
It was simply me responding to this. I tend to make a distinction between homosexuality and homosexual acts, as they aren't exclusive to one another.
And what if you feel the urge to go to a musical?![]()
The head of the Catholic Church in Britain wrote an opinion piece on why same-sex marriage should never be introduced into Britain. Here is the aforementioned article, complete with a list of logical fallacies he used.