- 31,544
- Buckwheat City
- Dennisch
It's okay for him to bash and attack people in an attempt to discredit them, it is his job right?
You funny.
It's okay for him to bash and attack people in an attempt to discredit them, it is his job right?
You funny.
Admittedly they might be good. I usually assume otherwise just because that's what most people who believe say is the story. But then, nothing important changes. Where is the proof?What logic would cause you to deduce, that there are not Machiavellian forces at work, but that those with the power wouldn't be evil.
You don't know that I don't have a pet unicorn.You don't know that he's not right.
Well actually you do, you made the claim.I don't need to back up my claim that the all-seeing eye is evidence of the illuminati. Because it isn't, but it could be.
https://www.mi5.gov.uk/MI5 doesn't exist either, nor does the FBI. Why? Because you can't provide prove that they exist. You can't even prove to us that you exist.
I honestly can't wait. Fish, barrels and guns all spring to mind given the current quality of debate.More to follow.......
What proof do you have either way. That's the key here.What logic would cause you to deduce, that there are not Machiavellian forces at work, but that those with the power wouldn't be evil.
History would indicate otherwise.
Who's job?It's okay for him to bash and attack people in an attempt to discredit them, it is his job right?
I was being kind.That is severely stretching it.
Exactly my point.What proof do you have either way. That's the key here.
Shush...it's a secret. But we do know of, non-secret organisations who are doing that right now.I have no doubt at all that many in power have conducted themselves in many different ways, for many different reasons and done some truly good and truly terrible things. None of that however points to a secret global organisation controlling the entire world.
Was the utter necessary? So, you're asking me, to prove that there is a 'secret cabal' or possibly 'not so secret cabal' that, at some point in time, was trying to rule the world. History was never my strongpoint.Nor does history support any claim that one has being doing so, and the utter lack of evidence from anyone kind of supports that position.
Who's job?
Exactly my point.
Shush...it's a secret. But we do know of, non-secret organisations who are doing that right now.
Was the utter necessary? So you're asking me to prove that there is 'secret cabal' or possibly 'not so secret cabal' at some point in time was trying to rule the world. History was never my strongpoint.
I figured it out.
You all still trying to figure out how to prove the FBI exist?
A website with contact information that can be supported by other independent sources is better than anything given for chemtrail people.So you think a website is evidence. Could I create a website for the illuminati and then point to that being proof. No. That is not proof.
So you think a website is evidence. Could I create a website for the illuminati and then point to that being proof. No. That is not proof.
So you think a website is evidence. Could I create a website for the illuminati and then point to that being proof. No. That is not proof.
How about you all prove the Illuminati DOESN'T exist??
Sorry, but to demand proof of a secret conspiracy theory is blatant ignorance of the definition of both words conspiracy and theory. Conspiracy theories are just that, theories. A theory with proof is no longer a theory or conspiracy.
/thread
Can't be done, so there is no point in trying. It's not how proof works anyway. Claimant bears the burden of proof.How about you all prove the Illuminati DOESN'T exist??
Sorry, but to demand proof of a secret conspiracy theory is blatant ignorance of the definition of both words conspiracy and theory. Conspiracy theories are just that, theories. A theory with proof is no longer a theory or conspiracy.
/thread
I dunno, at least one person found it funny. And I daresay more than one other person would say it's true.Off topic, not necessary, of no use to anyone.
More like a hobby.it is his job right?
https://www.northpole.com/
Very tricky to prove something doesn't exist. In fact, only slightly more difficult than proving a secret society runs the world. Eh Famine?
Anyone going to try to prove that Santa doesn't exist?
A theory is a theory until proof is shown. Illuminati is a theoretical organisation. Why? Because no proof exists to turn it from theory into fact. If you cannot prove the existence of something, stop trying to spin it around into "How about you all prove the Illuminati DOESN'T exist??". Apart from smacking of "I've lost the argument and I am desperate, if you come to a forum discussion topic or anything approaching a debating thread, you should at last have enough proof. I have just shown picture proof of the FBI's existence. Now show me your Illuminati proof.How about you all prove the Illuminati DOESN'T exist??
Sorry, but to demand proof of a secret conspiracy theory is blatant ignorance of the definition of both words conspiracy and theory. Conspiracy theories are just that, theories. A theory with proof is no longer a theory or conspiracy.
/thread
If it was on the door, I don't think people would believe it either.Really. I could show you any building in London, if it didn't have illuminati incorporated over the front door, you wouldn't believe it.
Can't be done, so there is no point in trying. It's not how proof works anyway. Claimant bears the burden of proof.
A theory requires a lot of proof to be a theory. Other than that, there is some ironic truth here.
The theory of gravity?Theory requires no proofs, otherwise it's not a theory.
Theory requires no proofs, otherwise it's not a theory.
Theory requires no proofs, otherwise it's not a theory.
Theory requires no proofs, otherwise it's not a theory.
And no-one here has proved to me that the F B I exists. Or that Santa doesn't.
Cheap get out. If a theory has no evidence it remains a theory. No evidence or proof = just a theory.
I personally believe that the universe had no set beginning, but I have no proof so it remains a theory.
How has a debate about the existence of the Illuminati turned into a thread about trying to prove the FBI is real (even though it clearly is, the pictures posted above are evidence of that, as if they were needed)?
That's a hypothesis.