the "just plain ugly" car thread

Well...uh...I was actually referring to the BMW-built Minis as a whole.
There's an easy way to distinguish BMW made MINIs and the original one. The BMW one is written with caps lock, the original, isn't.
And why the HELL would you pay nearly 40.000€ for this ugly car?​
40,000€? You mean 140,000€?



Oh wait, you're in Germany... Never mind.
 
Last edited:
Okay I see the 3er GT many isn't that bad in the real world but well Skoda does it better

now I want to ask all BMW fans (I don't know why I choose always BMW , normaly I like their cars more than other german company)
what is this?
design-stage-fw-01.jpg.resource.1389706499092.jpg

exterior-fw-02.jpg.resource.1407509764004.jpg

A FWD BMW as a Van that cost nearly 30k€ and you get something very unfamiliar (bad joke I know)
and you know what, it reminds me on a car already existing :
kia-carens-06-4175768262659028136.jpg

kia-carens-2013-01-1024x645.jpg
 
well I think thats too much for a car like this simply not a fan of Minis (the new ones) and this just look ugly ... especially the back of it ...

To be fair though, it's one thing to be "not a fan", but that's a totally different thing to saying something is "unbelievably expensive", and "not good for anything"... whilst opinions are always subjective... it's possible to be a little more objective than those statements.

I kind of like BMW's but when it comes to the two added letters "GT" on the 3er series or 5er I am speechless how bad they've designed these two I mean look at it:
View attachment 285268

you are out there on the road see one of them in front of you and you think : ,,Hey this was one of the new BMW seems like a 3er series or 4er? Hem maybe an X1 or this new X4 wait or maybe something between?"

And why the HELL would you pay nearly 40.000€ for this ugly car?​

Not that it will do your opinion the GT's any favours, but that is a photoshop, it's neither a 3GT and 5GT. Besides that, what does it matter if the person following you knows what your car is or not? Also, I'm guessing your last question was a rhetorical one - unless you really aren't able to accept some peoples tastes are different to yours.

Okay I see the 3er GT many isn't that bad in the real world but well Skoda does it better

now I want to ask all BMW fans (I don't know why I choose always BMW , normaly I like their cars more than other german company)
what is this?

A FWD BMW as a Van that cost nearly 30k€ and you get something very unfamiliar (bad joke I know)


It's a 2 series Active Tourer. To be joined soon by the 2 series Sport Active Tourer, which will be a 7 seater. It's like a VW Golf SV, only premium :lol:
 
To be fair though, it's one thing to be "not a fan", but that's a totally different thing to saying something is "unbelievably expensive", and "not good for anything"... whilst opinions are always subjective... it's possible to be a little more objective than those statements.



Not that it will do your opinion the GT's any favours, but that is a photoshop, it's neither a 3GT and 5GT. Besides that, what does it matter if the person following you knows what your car is or not? Also, I'm guessing your last question was a rhetorical one - unless you really aren't able to accept some peoples tastes are different to yours.



It's a 2 series Active Tourer. To be joined soon by the 2 series Sport Active Tourer, which will be a 7 seater. It's like a VW Golf SV, only premium :lol:
Yes I see no point neither in the 3GT or in the 2 series SAT ... It's my opinion about these cars I'm not a hater I simply don't understand what they are trying to do with that "new" design line ... I mean the new 2 series SAT looks nearly the same as the Kia that's not a BMW should do and I see no point where BMW wants to go (because they simply aren't a VAN manufacture company ) ... And with the example with the car on the road I just wanted to underline my opinion about making cars looking the same ... there are too many models that are simply superfluous ...
 
Yes I see no point neither in the 3GT or in the 2 series SAT ... It's my opinion about these cars I'm not a hater I simply don't understand what they are trying to do with that "new" design line ... I mean the new 2 series SAT looks nearly the same as the Kia that's not a BMW should do and I see no point where BMW wants to go (because they simply aren't a VAN manufacture company ) ... And with the example with the car on the road I just wanted to underline my opinion about making cars looking the same ... there are too many models that are simply superfluous ...
BMW are simply making a car for the people too sensible for MINIs (I.e- people with taste) and making a rival for the Mercedes B-class.

As for cars looking the same, 2 words: Aston Martin.
 
Yes. I find the H2 stupid, but not really ugly. I kinda like Smarts for some reason. And the Juke is one of the worst looking cars you can buy.
Worst on sale only because Hummer is dead and the ForShoe has been replaced :lol:
 
I have to kinda agree with the Crossfire... The Prowler & the PT Cruiser? Absolutely not.
The PT Cruiser is plain UGLY ... it's a mistake they made that car ... on the other side I kind of like the crossfire it's a cheap SLK
 
I'm not sure if the Tata Nano has been mentioned and I'm not going through 71 pages to find out. Anyways, I think the Nano is hideous. It looks like that a cartoon bug in my opinion.

2009_tata_nano.jpg
 
Back