The Le Mans General Discussion Thread

@Holdenhsvgtsr You're right that the initial cause for lift was air under the car. That's a no-brainer. My point is that there's no negative force from the fin pushing the car back down. If that was made confusing by me, then my fault. I am asserting that the fin assists the car into the air which was just proven by your post. Recall my argument:

I'd argue it makes the car easier to flip when it's bouncing through the grass.

Assume the contact from the idiot Ferrari driver is like the car bouncing through the grass. Lift is given by the rear of the car leaving the ground. The fin pushing air under the wing assists in lifting the right half of the Toyota off the ground. You can see in video of McNish's crash that the car is getting plenty of lift, but it's not enough to overcome its weight. No doubts that the fin is creating some of that.

By acting as a sail, I meant catching and re-directing air. You know best that a rigid sail is a crappy sail, but it's better than no sail.

Obviously, the weight of the car is mass*gravity. With his numbers, that's 3626Nm like what he got.

Drag checks in as 1/2(p)(v^2)(C)(A). Also correct.

A knowledge of fluid mechanics knows that anytime a fluid(in this case air) makes a turn, the pressure increases an amount that can be calculated. When the air hits the fin and turns under the wing, it undergoes an increase in pressure which isn't being factored in. Not to mention, the space it's traveling in becomes confined more as Air is still flying over the fin as the car travels. Is that enough to flip the car by itself? I highly doubt it unless he's going really really really fast.

So essentially, we're both right. I re-ran all of his calculations with unit conversions because those are crucial. His physics are correct. His lift calculation is correct.

You guys want to talk about safety: Why don't these factory teams with all the best engineers figure out a way to create a system that allows air to easily escape that's trapped under the car (and that doesn't mean the lackluster vents near the wheels. Hell, NASCAR does better than that) Channeling the air through and out of the top of the car when it is sideways or backwards is the way to go. Now, I do realize that at high speed, it's next to impossible to stop a flip like that with the huge amount of air put under the car very rapidly. The impulse is pretty high, but that's a project that can actually do some good for safety.
 
Again if you believe that then I'm worried :lol:

When the car is the correct way up its creating downforce not lift. If it was creating lift when up right then they wouldn't even allow it to race in excess of 300kph.

Also the rear of the car didn't lift to cause it to flip it was the front that lifted with the left rear suspension failed causing the rear of the car to drop and the front to lift, once the front lifted the air got under it and flipped it over and it the came back down as guess what it wasn't creatibg lift to gain flight.

Also if your using the argument that the fin rear wing lifted would be voided by the part that the car was facing 90 degrees to the direction it was traveling therefore no forword motion over the rear wing meaning it wasn't creating downforce or as you claim lift.....

With the ACO making it compulsory there will be a valid reason for it and they aren't doing it for the sake of it and it certainly won't be to assist the cars flipping causing harm to drivers.

I'm guessing this is one of the times the ignore list was invented for.
 
When the car is the correct way up its creating downforce not lift. If it was creating lift when up right then they wouldn't even allow it to race in excess of 300kph.

I'm not an engineer, but I would believe that the cars are designed to generate downforce in forward motion, thus following newtons laws that a vehicle travelling backwards would behave opposite to what is intended?
 
They just showed off the new Nissan LMP car in a Super Bowl commercial.
 
Can someone explain to me the difference between the "The Le Mans General Discussion" and the "2015 WEC / ELMS Discussion Thread"
 
This thread is usually used for the 24 Hours of Le Mans race, the WEC thread is used for the other WEC races.
 
I thought a specific 24 Hours of Le Mans thread will be made a week before the race and this was for the WEC and other Le Mans series discussions.
 
Can someone explain to me the difference between the "The Le Mans General Discussion" and the "2015 WEC / ELMS Discussion Thread"
The Le Mans General Discussion thread was created to condense all Le Mans related discussion into one thread. As sportscar racing and this forum have changed since then, we're moving to separate threads again it seems (which I've argued for for years).
 

Yes, the Nissan is front-engined, makes use of a 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6…but it’s also front-wheel drive.

(We’ll pause a few seconds to let that one sink in.)

An FWD LMP1-H design. Friends, that’s just bat**** crazy. Some of the numbers being mentioned as possible combined horsepower and KERS power took the concept to the outer edges of reason. Marshall explained the early targets were in the 2000hp range with the use of an 8mJ “double” Flybrid system fitted to the car, but practical limitations lowered the bar to approximately 1500hp.

FWD? I'm very curious about the performance of this thing. The more that I learn about it the more seems to me that this is more garage 56 stuff than the regular LMP approach.
 
FWD? I'm very curious about the performance of this thing. The more that I learn about it the more seems to me that this is more garage 56 stuff than the regular LMP approach.
It's all wheel drive with the hybrid system, or something like that I guess. Still way too much power to the front wheels.
 
I like the way it looks with that livery. Also, can we merge this thread with the WEC/ELMS thread or something? It's confusing having two.
 
Wow Nissan sure know how to make commercials. GTR is an awesome looking car to be honest. I love the Red they went with. Let's hope it's more than a one trick pony.

I love the exhaust set up on this machine.

Nissan_GT_R_LM_NISMO_LMP1_by_Marshall_Pruett_9-4595-900-506-80-c.jpg

Nissan_GT_R_LM_NISMO_LMP1_by_Marshall_Pruett_54-4616-900-506-80-c.jpg
 
Last edited:
Toyota should send Nissan a thank you for using Tundra safety vehicles instead of the all new Titan in the SB commercial.
 

Latest Posts

Back