Well driving wise it would be better, considering the weight loss and the fact it's already a good car to drive.Im sure Russia could use atleast one of those, the Russian market can always settle for plastic bumpers and general boringness in a car.
At this stage, with a car like this, it should have a delete options. A/C, radio, wind down Windows, thin seats, no sound deadening. No steering wheel buttons. Steel wheels. Black bumpers. Carbon bonnet and boot lid options. The car has been around that long to warrant those items and for the car to be tailored.
Lightness isn't the issue, it's the price.A lot of those things would have to be specifically developed and engineered. This would add cost to the overall program for a very, very, very small amount of people who would be interested in those things.
The car is already absurdly light. Be thankful.
Probably the case, the MX5 is like 200kg lighter then the 86 Which is a significant amount but it should be noted that the engine is Half a Litre smaller as well.Lightness costs money. As does the SkyActiv motor. I would not be surprised if the premium optioning of the car is simply a way of hiding the high price of the ultra-light chassis and the unique direct injection motor.
The 86 (I'm guessing) probably costs a lot less to build and engineer, with carry-over parts and assemblies borrowed from the Subaru and Toyota/Lexus stables.
.. At the moment.The MX-5 is in its own class.
Is it going to be $10k more then?If that Fiat is $10k more, I dunno.![]()
I imagine it will have some styling changes.I hope it's more then just a rebadge that would be pointless.
Is it going to be $10k more then?
Just assumption then.I dunno.![]()
To be honest, I just hope the Fiat looks better.Does Fiat want "their" newest roadster to undercut the benchmark MX-5? If I'm going to buy my first afffordable RWD Italian sports car, I'd hope it was a class above "the hairdresser's" default drop top
Put a Caterham 160 on a high volume assembly line. Would that drive the price down to 86 prices?
Since the 160 uses the good old Suzuki three-pot... I'd wager you could get it down to Nissan Versa pricing if it were ever to be mass-produced.
-
Or possibly even lower. Given enough volume, a 160 ought to cost well under $10,000.
Light makes for fun, but it can also enhance gas mileage, of course, and in the 2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata, the latter, at least, comes down to hard data: 27 mpg city, 34 mpg highway, and 30 mpg combined when fitted with the standard six-speed manual transmission.
The optional six-speed automatic boosts mileage a touch to 27/36/30 mpg city/highway/combined.
That's what the world needs. A new Suzuki Cappuccino. That would be the answer to everything.Suzuki three-pot...
I don't think there is a plan to revive the Cappucino, but last year, the Daihatsu Copen was revived and it looks pretty sick. Still has the usual 63 horsepower.That's what the world needs. A new Suzuki Cappuccino. That would be the answer to everything.![]()
That's a shame, I quite like Copens but hopefully they'll change their minds. The world needs another Capp.I don't think there is a plan to revive the Cappucino, but last year, the Daihatsu Copen was revived and it looks pretty sick. Still has the usual 63 horsepower.
And once they come in, I bet people would work on swaps with them as soon as possible.That's a shame, I quite like Copens but hopefully they'll change their minds. The world needs another Capp.