The next-gen MX-5 Miata thread

Thing with the 124 is that unlike Miata, it doesn't look like it belongs parked on the side of boulevard, in front of Starbucks.. It looks more like it wouldn't look out of place at race track paddocks, it has more masculine feel to it.. A proper hairy-chested Italian car, if you will. TBH, it has some elements that make me think last gen of Viper.

There's nothing hairy-chested about the Fiat in person. If anything, it looks more like the boulevard car, and judging by the amount of women I saw flocking to it versus the Miata at the autoshow last month, I'd imagine that's where I'll see it.

It does have some Viper-ish elements, I'll agree about that.

New Abarth is disappointing. If they haven't dropped significant weight, a dozen more horsepower won't amount to much of a performance change at all.
 
18.png
That's ghastly.
 
There's nothing hairy-chested about the Fiat in person. If anything, it looks more like the boulevard car, and judging by the amount of women I saw flocking to it versus the Miata at the autoshow last month, I'd imagine that's where I'll see it.

It does have some Viper-ish elements, I'll agree about that.

New Abarth is disappointing. If they haven't dropped significant weight, a dozen more horsepower won't amount to much of a performance change at all.

IMHO the 124 has more flair, more striking appearance..
 
I'm not sure how much weight they can remove from the car. Mazda spent a lot of time shaving ounces and it really shows if you look underneath. More power it is!
 
There's nothing hairy-chested about the Fiat in person. If anything, it looks more like the boulevard car, and judging by the amount of women I saw flocking to it versus the Miata at the autoshow last month, I'd imagine that's where I'll see it.

It does have some Viper-ish elements, I'll agree about that.

New Abarth is disappointing. If they haven't dropped significant weight, a dozen more horsepower won't amount to much of a performance change at all.

And we still havent heard anything about the US Version which is said to get more than 170hp.
 
-> ...
I hope it reassembles the FD3S roof line like in this render
siu8xrgmvaxjgbhiiqoc.jpg

Probably wouldn't happen, But it won't hurt to cross my fingers
^ Sadly, I love the hatch-like function...but it will probably won't happen. It will be more like this:

upload_2016-3-15_2-4-55.png


upload_2016-3-15_2-5-6.png


upload_2016-3-15_2-5-17.png


upload_2016-3-15_2-5-33.png

^ It would definitely follow the excellent formula of the NC Roadster Coupe. As what Mazda always follow, "if ain't broke, don't fix it."

-> I've always like the PHRT. Unfortunately, I need lower seat rails for my scalp not to touch the hard plastic ceiling. (already driven a NC PHRT) :indiff:
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-3-15_2-3-31.png
    upload_2016-3-15_2-3-31.png
    115.6 KB · Views: 18
I think it would look better if it was all just one colour.
I just plain don't understand the appeal of the carbon fiber look. Don't get me wrong, I think it's a fantastic material--I have two carbon bikes--but flaunting bare (well, visible weave anyway) carbon fiber is just silly to me. Exponentially worse is the carbon or carbon-look garnish panels that go over existing components so that you're actually adding weight.
 
Drove an ND today. It was fantastic. However, I still feel the NC is more fantastic. Both are miles better (IMO) than the FR-S/BR-Z. There is this absolute immediacy to every control on both the NC and ND that I've experienced in almost no other cars. The ZN6 twins (and also the S2000) feel somehow slightly more elastic in comparison.
 
Drove an ND today. It was fantastic. However, I still feel the NC is more fantastic. Both are miles better (IMO) than the FR-S/BR-Z. There is this absolute immediacy to every control on both the NC and ND that I've experienced in almost no other cars. The ZN6 twins (and also the S2000) feel somehow slightly more elastic in comparison.
I'd disagree on both counts. For me the ND is a step up from the NC - it feels the same as the specs suggest: more compact, lighter, nimbler, faster.

But the BRZ/86 is a step up from the Mazda, grip and engine characteristics aside. More steering feel, better body control, less body roll at speed, no cowl shake, better (lower, straighter) driving position.

The Toyota/Subaru don't have as much outright grip thanks to the Primacy tyres, don't feel as fast unless you really wind it out and don't ride quite as well as the Mazda, but they feel like more serious sports cars.

Two things hobble the ND for me: Mazda's insistence that it should roll to give the illusion you're working the car hard, and the steering. The former isn't a problem when you're just knocking around because the illusion works: it feels like you're getting a lot from the car. But ultimately it feels a bit artificial - my NA rolls, but it's a softer car in the first place, has more give in the tyres, narrower rubber, and moves around a lot more. The ND just feels like they've forgotten to fit dampers that match the spring rate.

I can see what you mean about immediacy in the ND, but I think that's also partly an illusion, because the steering's initial rate of response is quite high - it always feels darty and agile. But past that initial point the response seems to slow, probably because the suspension hasn't yet settled, so it feels a bit odd. And there's not really much feel either - certainly compared to my NA, but also compared to the BRZ/86. Again, compared to the NA that also makes the roll frustrating, because it's harder to tell when the car stops rolling and actually starts loading up. I actually found it was a bit better in the wet. You think you'd need more feel in the wet, but because grip is lower the car doesn't roll as much and it starts moving around in a more predictable fashion.

Don't get me wrong: I do quite like the ND. It looks way better than the Toyota/Subaru (and the NC, IMO) and has a nicer cabin. It's a feel-good car. But Mazda's insistence on making it handle like an older MX-5 doesn't really work, because it's not an old car. Would love to try one that's been properly set up on new springs/dampers or coilovers.
 
There's nothing hairy-chested about the Fiat in person. If anything, it looks more like the boulevard car, and judging by the amount of women I saw flocking to it versus the Miata at the autoshow last month, I'd imagine that's where I'll see it.

It does have some Viper-ish elements, I'll agree about that.

New Abarth is disappointing. If they haven't dropped significant weight, a dozen more horsepower won't amount to much of a performance change at all.
I was a bit disappointed by the Abarth after reading that they said it would be very agressive and it has all new body panels over the 124. It doesnt look that much different to the 124 and the front is not merely aggressive enough, I posted a photo about 10 pages back of a render and it looks far better
 
I'd disagree on both counts. For me the ND is a step up from the NC - it feels the same as the specs suggest: more compact, lighter, nimbler, faster.

But the BRZ/86 is a step up from the Mazda, grip and engine characteristics aside. More steering feel, better body control, less body roll at speed, no cowl shake, better (lower, straighter) driving position.

The Toyota/Subaru don't have as much outright grip thanks to the Primacy tyres, don't feel as fast unless you really wind it out and don't ride quite as well as the Mazda, but they feel like more serious sports cars.

Two things hobble the ND for me: Mazda's insistence that it should roll to give the illusion you're working the car hard, and the steering. The former isn't a problem when you're just knocking around because the illusion works: it feels like you're getting a lot from the car. But ultimately it feels a bit artificial - my NA rolls, but it's a softer car in the first place, has more give in the tyres, narrower rubber, and moves around a lot more. The ND just feels like they've forgotten to fit dampers that match the spring rate.

I can see what you mean about immediacy in the ND, but I think that's also partly an illusion, because the steering's initial rate of response is quite high - it always feels darty and agile. But past that initial point the response seems to slow, probably because the suspension hasn't yet settled, so it feels a bit odd. And there's not really much feel either - certainly compared to my NA, but also compared to the BRZ/86. Again, compared to the NA that also makes the roll frustrating, because it's harder to tell when the car stops rolling and actually starts loading up. I actually found it was a bit better in the wet. You think you'd need more feel in the wet, but because grip is lower the car doesn't roll as much and it starts moving around in a more predictable fashion.

Don't get me wrong: I do quite like the ND. It looks way better than the Toyota/Subaru (and the NC, IMO) and has a nicer cabin. It's a feel-good car. But Mazda's insistence on making it handle like an older MX-5 doesn't really work, because it's not an old car. Would love to try one that's been properly set up on new springs/dampers or coilovers.

I should clarify a bit. When I speak about the immediacy of the controls, I'm not so much speaking about the kinematics of the chassis, but more how every control (such as the clutch, brakes, shifter, and so on) feel to use. The engine also feels more eager. I did notice that the car has some cartoonish body roll even at moderate speeds. I agree that the steering isn't all that great, but it's not so great in the ZN6 twins either. NC is better than both in this regard. The Mazdas have a far more serious suspension design, (double wishbone in the Mazda vs McPherson strut in the Toybaru) so while they may feel a little too soft stock, when you throw on some better dampers and springs they must feel incredible.

To me, the Mazdas (both NC and ND) are simply more desirable. They feel special even though they are ubiquitous. I don't know how they managed that. It's an unmatched combination of design and engineering. When I sat in the NC, I wanted to drive 1000 miles right then.

Stock for stock, I can see your point about the ND looking better than the NC (although I actually slightly disagree in that the NC3 looks better than the ND to me) but the NC1 cars look really, really awesome with just a few simple mods to get rid of the gigglypuff stock look. Which can be done in a variety of different ways which I'll demonstrate here:

14725040215_7e1dc3647c_b_zpspqacpot5.jpg


detailday-27_zpsvigvmqor.jpg


krMM1MV_zps3kne8lii.jpg


center_exhaust_II_zpsuymtmget.jpg


bjRAqCl_zpsbkwatyd4.jpg


Something doesn't quite grab me about the ND like a slightly done-up NC does. And I've seen plenty of modified ND cars as well. Haven't yet seen one that made me think "I need that"
 
Last edited:
I should clarify a bit. When I speak about the immediacy of the controls, I'm not so much speaking about the kinematics of the chassis, but more how every control (such as the clutch, brakes, shifter, and so on) feel to use. The engine also feels more eager.
That makes sense.
I agree that the steering isn't all that great, but it's not so great in the ZN6 twins either. NC is better than both in this regard.
I'd disagree on that. The NC improved a lot through its time on sale, but the steering was never anything particularly special - I'd certainly pick the Toyota/Subaru over it. I do think the ND has gone slightly backwards steering-wise, though conversely it also feels more responsive thanks to that off-centre pointiness.

My main issue with the NC though is that it's not a very progressive car when it loses grip, compared to any of the other cars discussed - other generations of MX-5, or the Subaru/Toyota. Fairly sizeable tyres as standard, a relatively firm setup and a short wheelbase means it's always felt a little snappy to me. Fine on a circuit with a bit more space to play with, but disconcerting on the road.
The Mazdas have a far more serious suspension design, (double wishbone in the Mazda vs McPherson strut in the Toybaru) so while they may feel a little too soft stock, when you throw on some better dampers and springs they must feel incredible.
I often think the benefits of double wishbones are a little overstated. They're great in theory, but as the ND proves they don't really make any difference whatsoever unless the car is well set-up. Same deal with old Civics - until you start playing about with them they're not a patch on most European hatches with struts up front and a torsion bar at the rear - a supposedly unsophisticated setup that everyone bemoaned when Honda itself went that direction.

When you start swapping aftermarket bits in, then sure, but with the Mazda you'd have to start adding in extra structural stiffness too, which isn't so necessary with the 86/BRZ by virtue of them having a roof. I like driving open-topped cars, but most of them are on the back foot to start with as far as torsional stiffness goes.
To me, the Mazdas (both NC and ND) are simply more desirable. They feel special even though they are ubiquitous. I don't know how they managed that. It's an unmatched combination of design and engineering. When I sat in the NC, I wanted to drive 1000 miles right then.
The ND feels like that for me but the NC doesn't. Apart from anything, when I had an NC on test for a week and coincidentally did about a thousand miles in that time, I ended up with backache. The slightly offset driving position and lack of under-thigh support on the seats was a literal pain. Suspect the ND is better in that regard as it has a bit more space in the footwell and the seats have adjustable thigh support.
 
but the NC1 cars look really, really awesome with just a few simple mods to get rid of the gigglypuff stock look.
I do agree with that. It's a good "blank sheet of paper" as far as modifications go - a fairly simple design that works well with simple changes.

The ND is I think just a great looking car. I like that the proportions have changed slightly over previous MX-5s, with a shorter rear and longer hood. Looks much more expensive than it is too, I reckon - particularly in Soul Red, which looks great on all current Mazdas.
 
@homeforsummer - the softness, that's a criticism I've heard before and dismissed (because I don't mind a bit of body roll), but you're the first person who's actually given reasoning for the argument that I actually agree with.
 
Yeah, generally I don't mind a bit of softness and roll, but much as I'd usually criticise modern cars for being too firm, the tradeoff is usually great body control and ideally a nice, linear motion from turn in to mid-corner balance. I think the ND rolls more than you'd expect, which is more of a problem than it rolling per se.

One of my colleagues has just driven BBR's take on the car in the mag that comes out this week. Apparently it's a lot better, and aside from power upgrades all they've done is given it some springs more appropriate to the dampers, a set of smaller-offset wheels and a new geometry setup.
 
Back